EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 672 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 672 (2025) 07040 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 672, 2025
The 17th ROOMVENT Conference (ROOMVENT 2024)
Article Number 07040
Number of page(s) 8
Section Poster Articles: Ventilation & Energy Efficiency, Modelling & Measuring
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202567207040
Published online 05 December 2025
  1. N. Khan, K. S. Khattak, S. Ullah, and Z. Khan, A low-cost IoT based system for environmental monitoring, 173-178 (2019). doi: 10.1109/FIT47737.2019.00041. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sriyanka and S. R. Patil, Smart Environmental Monitoring through Internet of Things (IoT) using RaspberryPi 3, 595-600 (2018). doi: 10.1109/CTCEEC.2017.8455056. [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Ferdoush and X. Li, Wireless sensor network system design using Raspberry Pi and Arduino for environmental monitoring applications, in Procedia Computer Science 34, 103-110 (2014), doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2014.07.059. [Google Scholar]
  4. I. Calvo, A. Espin, J. M. Gil-García, P. F. Bustamante, O. Barambones, and E. Apiñaniz, Scalable IoT Architecture for Monitoring IEQ Conditions in Public and Private Buildings, Energies 15 (6), 2270 (2022), doi: 10.3390/en15062270. [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Uzair, S. Yacoub Al-Kafrawi, K. Manaf Al-Janadi, and I. Abdulrahman Al-Bulushi, A Low-Cost IoT Based Buildings Management System (BMS) Using Arduino Mega 2560 And Raspberry Pi 4 For Smart Monitoring and Automation, Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. Syst. 13 (3), 219–236 (2022), doi: 10.32985/ijeces.13.3.7. [Google Scholar]
  6. A. J. Lewis, M. Campbell, and P. Stavroulakis, Performance evaluation of a cheap, open source, digital environmental monitor based on the Raspberry Pi, Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed. 87, 228-235 (2016), doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2016.03.023. [Google Scholar]
  7. G. Parmar, S. Lakhani, and M. K. Chattopadhyay, An IoT based low cost air pollution monitoring system, in International Conference on Recent Innovations in Signal Processing and Embedded Systems, RISE 2017, 524-528 (2018), vol. 2018-Janua. doi: 10.1109/RISE.2017.8378212. [Google Scholar]
  8. S. G. Nikhade, Wireless sensor network system using Raspberry Pi and zigbee for environmental monitoring applications, 376-381 (2015). doi: 10.1109/ICSTM.2015.7225445. [Google Scholar]
  9. A. D. Deshmukh and U. B. Shinde, A low cost environment monitoring system using raspberry pi and Arduino with Zigbee, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Inventive Computation Technologies, ICICT 2016, 1-6 (2016), vol. 2016. doi: 10.1109/INVENTIVE.2016.7830096. [Google Scholar]
  10. D. Perez-Diaz-de-Cerio, Á. Hernández-Solana, A. Valdovinos, J. Olmos, and J. L. Valenzuela, Low-cost test measurement setup for real IoT BLE sensor device characterization, Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed. 135, 814–827 (2019), doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2018.11.082. [Google Scholar]
  11. T. Addabbo, A. Fort, M. Mugnaini, S. Parrino, A. Pozzebon, and V. Vignoli, Using the I2C bus to set up Long Range Wired Sensor and Actuator Networks in Smart Buildings, 1-8 (2019). doi: 10.1109/CCCS.2019.8888085. [Google Scholar]
  12. Y. Kang, L. Aye, T. D. Ngo, and J. Zhou, Performance evaluation of low-cost air quality sensors: A review, Science of the Total Environment 818, 151769 (2022). doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151769. [Google Scholar]
  13. J. M. Barcelo-Ordinas, J. Garcia-Vidal, M. Doudou, S. Rodrigo-Munoz, and A. Cerezo-Llavero, Calibrating low-cost air quality sensors using multiple arrays of sensors, in IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, WCNC, 1-6 (2018), vol. 2018-April. doi: 10.1109/WCNC.2018.8377051. [Google Scholar]
  14. S. G. Fulton, J. C. Stegen, M. H. Kaufman, J. Dowd, and A. Thompson, “Laboratory evaluation of open source and commercial electrical conductivity sensor precision and accuracy: How do they compare?,” PLoS One 18(5), e0285092 (2023), doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285092. [Google Scholar]
  15. L. Liang, Calibrating low-cost sensors for ambient air monitoring: Techniques, trends, and challenges, Environmental Research 197, 111163 (2021). doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111163. [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Nambiar, A. Nikolaev, M. Greene, L. Cavuoto, and A. Bisantz, Low-Cost Sensor System Design for In-Home Physical Activity Tracking, IEEE J. Transl. Eng. Heal. Med. 4, 1-6 (2016), doi: 10.1109/JTEHM.2016.2620971. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.