Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 673, 2025
International Conference on Environmental Community for Sustainable Future (ICECOFFE 2025)
Article Number 02001
Number of page(s) 7
Section Sustainable Community
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202567302001
Published online 10 December 2025
  1. Aleksandra, E., & Petrov-Nerling, G. Systemic ESG risks: industrial analysis. Procedia Computer Science (2023). [Google Scholar]
  2. Aswani, J., Raghunandan, A., Rajgopal, S., & Edmans, A. Are Carbon Emissions Associated with Stock Returns?”, Review of Finance, 28 (1) (2024). [Google Scholar]
  3. Blokhin, A. A., & Gridin, R. V. (2021). “Institutional Factors in Economic Forecasts”. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 32(5) (2021). [Google Scholar]
  4. Jasni, N. S., & Zulkifli, A. The Moderating Role of Sector Risk in the Relationship between ESG and Financial Performance: Evidence from Top Companies in Malaysia”. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 8(2) (2024). [Google Scholar]
  5. Jiang, M., Gao, X., Guan, Q., Hao, X., & An, F. The Structural Roles of Sectors and their Contributions to Global Carbon Emissions: A Complex Network Perspective”. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  6. Keliuotytė-Staniulėnienė, G., & Mačėnaitė, J. The Impact of a Company’s ESG Profile on Equity Value and Risk, Contemporary Studies in Economic and Financial Analysis, 116 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  7. Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, (1967). [Google Scholar]
  8. Lhutfi, I., Ludigdo, U., Rusydi, M. K., & Baridwan, Z. Investment and Sustainability: CSR, SDGs and the ESG Score in Indonesia. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1). (2024). [Google Scholar]
  9. Mazziotta, M., & Pareto, A. Normalization Methods for Spatio-temporal Analysis of Environmental Performance: Revisiting the Min–Max Method. Environmetrics, 33(5) (2022). [Google Scholar]
  10. Patil, S. R., Jadhav, S. N., & Nimbagal, S. A Study on Ethical Implications of using Technology in ESG Investing and Ensuring Unbiased Decision Making. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 6(8) (2024). [Google Scholar]
  11. Peari, S. The Combination of Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance Factors has an Important Place in Business Today”. Alternative Law Journal, 48(4) (2023). [Google Scholar]
  12. Wasiuta, A. Assessing Renewable Energy Development Potential in Polish Voivodeships: A Comparative Regional Analysis”. Sustainability, 16(24) (2024). [Google Scholar]
  13. Xie, H., Qin, Z., & Li, J. ESG performance and corporate carbon emission intensity: based on panel data analysis of A-share listed companies”. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  14. Ye, J., & Xu, W. Carbon reduction effect of ESG: empirical evidence from listed manufacturing companies in China. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 11 (2023). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.