Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 675, 2025
International Scientific Conference on Geosciences and Environmental Management (GeoME’5.5 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01002 | |
| Number of page(s) | 11 | |
| Section | Smart and Sustainable Materials, Energy and Environmental Systems | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202567501002 | |
| Published online | 11 December 2025 | |
- Rafi MM, Varum H (2017) Seismic performance of adobe construction. Sustain Resilient Infrastruct 2:8–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2017.1278996 [Google Scholar]
- Meglio E, Formisano A (2025) Hemp-based systems as seismic strenghtening interventions of existing masonry buildings. J Build Eng 112:113786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025.113786 [Google Scholar]
- Barbhuiya S, Bhusan Das B, Adak D, Rajput AS (2025) Next-generation building envelopes: Smart materials, energy efficiency and environmental impact. Next Mater 9:101226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nxmate.2025.101226 [Google Scholar]
- Mora-Ruiz V, Mejía-Parada C, Nuñez B, et al (2024) Experimental analysis of the cyclic behavior of rammed earth walls reinforced with arundo donax natural fiber. Heliyon 10:e37084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37084 [Google Scholar]
- EL MOADEN N (2025) Vernacular architecture and seismic resilience: Which techniques for which territories? In: Vernacular architecture: Support for Territorial Development. pp 232–241 [Google Scholar]
- Suttie E, Hill C, Sandin G, et al (2017) Environmental assessment of bio-based building materials. In: Performance of Bio-based Building Materials. Elsevier, pp 547–591 [Google Scholar]
- Penazzato L, Illampas R, Oliveira D V. (2024) The Challenge of Integrating Seismic and Energy Retrofitting of Buildings: An Opportunity for Sustainable Materials? Sustainability 16:3465. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083465 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Soares N, Tavares V (2025) Bibliometric Analysis of the Intersection of Circular Economy, Prefabrication, and Modularity in the Building Industry. Buildings 15:1923. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15111923 [Google Scholar]
- Bastami M, Abbasnejadfard M, Motamed H, et al (2022) Development of hybrid earthquake vulnerability functions for typical residential buildings in Iran. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 77:103087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103087 [Google Scholar]
- Lee G, Park JH, Pham KVA, et al (2021) Experimental Investigation of Traditional Clay Brick and Lime Mortar Intended for Restoration of Cultural Heritage Sites. Appl Sci 11:6228. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11136228 [Google Scholar]
- Wang H, Yuan K, Zhang S, Guo J (2023) Experimental Study on the Seismic Behavior of a Modified Adobe-Brick-Masonry Composite Wall with a Wooden- Construction Center Column. Sustainability 15:8360. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108360 [Google Scholar]
- Yadav S, Damerji H, Keco R, et al (2021) Effects of horizontal seismic band on seismic response in masonry structure: Application of DIC technique. Prog Disaster Sci 10:100149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2021.100149 [Google Scholar]
- Adhikari RK, D’Ayala D (2020) 2015 Nepal earthquake: seismic performance and post-earthquake reconstruction of stone in mud mortar masonry buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 18:3863–3896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00834-y [Google Scholar]
- Koh CH (Alex), Kraniotis D (2020) A review of material properties and performance of straw bale as building material. Constr Build Mater 259:120385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120385 [Google Scholar]
- Adetooto J, Windapo A, Pomponi F, et al (2024) Strategies to promote the acceptance of sandbag building technology for sustainable and affordable housing delivery: the South African case. J Eng Des Technol 22:1505–1522. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-06-2022-0290 [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.