Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 675, 2025
International Scientific Conference on Geosciences and Environmental Management (GeoME’5.5 2025)
Article Number 01012
Number of page(s) 10
Section Smart and Sustainable Materials, Energy and Environmental Systems
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202567501012
Published online 11 December 2025
  1. A. P. Friedlingstein, M. O’Sullivan, M.W. Jones, R.M. Andrew, D.C.E. Bakker, J. Hauck, P. Landschützer, C. Le Quéré, I.T. Luijkx, G.P. Peters, W. Peters, J. Pongratz, C. Schwingshackl, S. Sitch, J.G. Canadell, P. Ciais, R.B. Jackson, S.R. Alin, P. Anthoni, …B. Zheng, Global carbon budget 2023. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 15, 5301–5369 (2023). https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5301-2023 [Google Scholar]
  2. J. Mularski, K. Stasiak, M. Ostrycharczyk, M. Czerep, M. Wnukowski, K. Krochmalny, M. Baranowski, P. Ziółkowski, M. Kowal, A. Arora, Vishwajeet, H. Pawlak-Kruczek, L. Niedzwiecki, D. Mikielewicz, The effect of hydrothermal carbonization on entrained flow steam gasification of sewage sludge. Experimental validation of various gasification models. Energy 318, 134885 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.134885 [Google Scholar]
  3. Franco. A, Green Hydrogen and the Energy Transition: Hopes, Challenges, and Realistic Opportunities. Hydrogen 6, 28 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrogen6020028 [Google Scholar]
  4. F. Kokalj, B. Arbiter, N. Samec, Sewage sludge gasification as an alternative energy storage model. Energy Convers. Manag. 149, 738–747 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.02.076 [Google Scholar]
  5. J.M. De Andrés, E. Roche, A. Narros, M.E. Rodríguez, Characterisation of tar from sewage sludge gasification. Influence of gasifying conditions: Temperature, throughput, steam and use of primary catalysts. Fuel 180, 116–126 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.04.012 [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Boldyryev, D. Maljković, E. Kirasić, G. Krajačić, Assessment of product composition and energy output of sewage sludge gasification by simulation model. Energy 321, 135476 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.135476 [Google Scholar]
  7. N. Ghavami, K. Özdenkçi, C. De Blasio, Process simulation of co-HTC of sewage sludge and food waste digestates and supercritical water gasification of aqueous effluent integrated with biogas plants. Energy 291, 130221 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.130221 [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Ben Ali, A. Benzaouak, M. Tangarfa, Y. Abrouki, S. Belekbir, M. El Hazzat, A. El Hamidi, L. Abdelouahed, Multi-response optimization of the adsorption properties of activated carbon produced from H₂SO₄ activated sludge: Effects of washing with HCl. Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng. 11, 101219 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2025.101219 [Google Scholar]
  9. P. Wiercik, M. Kuśnierz, M. Kabsch-Korbutowicz, A. Plucińska, P. Chrobot, Evaluation of changes in activated sludge and sewage sludge quality by FTIR analysis and laser diffraction, Desalin. Water Treat. 273, 114-125 (2022). https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2022.28855 [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Ben Ali, M. Flayou, Y. Boutarba, M. El Youssfi, Y. Bakhtaoui, M. El Hazzat, A. Sifou, M. Dahhou, M. Kacimi, A. Benzaouak, A. El Hamidi, Conversion of urban sludge into KOH-activated biochar for methylene blue adsorption. Moroc. J. Chem. 12, 1852–1869 (2024). https://doi.org/10.48317/IMIST.PRSM/MORJCHEM-V12I4.50578 [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Schmid, S. Hafner, G. Scheffknecht, Experimental parameter study on synthesis gas production by steam-oxygen fluidized bed gasification of sewage sludge. Appl. Sci. 11, 579 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/app11020579 [Google Scholar]
  12. G. Maitlo, I. Ali, K. H. Mangi, S. Ali, H. A. Maitlo, I. N. Unar, A. M. Pirzada, Thermochemical conversion of biomass for syngas production: Current status and future trends. Sustainability 14, 2596 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052596 [Google Scholar]
  13. T. Berdugo Vilches, J. Marinkovic, M. Seemann, H. Thunman, Comparing active bed materials in a dual fluidized bed biomass gasifier: olivine, bauxite, quartz-sand, and ilmenite. Energy Fuels 30, 4848-4857 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b00327 [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Kuba, H. Hofbauer, Experimental parametric study on product gas and tar composition in dual fluid bed gasification of woody biomass. Biomass Bioenergy 115, 35-44 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.04.007 [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Yahyazadeh, A. K. Dalai, W. Ma, L. Zhang, Fischer–Tropsch synthesis for light olefins from syngas: a review of catalyst development. Reactions 2, 227-257 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/reactions2030015 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.