EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 675 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 675 (2025) 03008 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 675, 2025
International Scientific Conference on Geosciences and Environmental Management (GeoME’5.5 2025)
Article Number 03008
Number of page(s) 9
Section Artificial Intelligence and Smart Modeling for Resilient Civil Infrastructure and Environmental Systems
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202567503008
Published online 11 December 2025
  1. S. A. Khoso, Z. Gao, M. Tian, Y. Hu, & W. Sun, The synergistic depression phenomenon of an organic and inorganic reagent on FeS2 in Cu[sbnd]S flotation scheme. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 299 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2019.112198. [Google Scholar]
  2. Barry. Wills & James. Finch, Wills’ Mineral Processing Technology: An Introduction to the Practical Aspects of Ore Treatment and Mineral Recovery, Eighth Edition (Elsevier Science and Technology Books, Inc., 2016). [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Jahedsaravani, M. Massinaei, & M. Zarie, Measurement of bubble size and froth velocity using convolutional neural networks. Minerals Engineering, 204 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2023.108400. [Google Scholar]
  4. C. Aldrich, C. Marais, B. J. Shean, & J. J. Cilliers, Online monitoring and control of froth flotation systems with machine vision: A review. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 96 (2010) 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.minpro.2010.04.005. [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Jahedsaravani, M. Massinaei, & M. H. Marhaban, An image segmentation algorithm for measurement of flotation froth bubble size distributions. Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation, 111 (2017) 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2017.07.023. [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Jahedsaravani, M. H. Marhaban, M. Massinaei, M. I. Saripan, & N. Mehrshad, Development of a new algorithm for segmentation of flotation froth images (2014). [Google Scholar]
  7. M. L. Tian, J. M. Yang, & M. Q. Tian, Improved extracting algorithm of internal markers for froth image watershed segmentation of coal flotation. International Journal of Simulation: Systems, Science and Technology, 17 (2016). https://doi.org/10.5013/IJSSST.a.17.26.16. [Google Scholar]
  8. H. Zhang, Z. Tang, Y. Xie, X. Gao, & Q. Chen, A watershed segmentation algorithm based on an optimal marker for bubble size measurement. Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation, 138 (2019) 182–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.02.005. [Google Scholar]
  9. A. W. Banford & Z. Aktas, The effect of reagent addition strategy on the performance of coal flotation. Minerals Engineering, 17 (2004) 745–760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2004.01.005. [Google Scholar]
  10. G. Forbes & G. De Jager, Bubble size distributions for froth classification (2005). [Google Scholar]
  11. W. Wang, F. Bergholm, & B. Yang, Froth delineation based on image classification. Minerals Engineering, 16 (2003) 1183–1192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2003.07.014. [Google Scholar]
  12. B. Lin, B. Recke, J. K. H. Knudsen, & S. B. Jørgensen, Bubble size estimation for flotation processes. Minerals Engineering, 21 (2008) 539–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2007.11.004. [Google Scholar]
  13. P. N. Holtham & K. K. Nguyen, On-line analysis of froth surface in coal and mineral flotation using JKFrothCam (2002). [Google Scholar]
  14. T. Boyadzhiev & K. Ivanova, Unification of Semantic and Instance Segmentation with Boundary X. Cybernetics and Information Technologies, 25 (2025) 54–67. https://doi.org/10.2478/cait-2025-0022. [Google Scholar]
  15. E. Prokopov, D. Usacheva, M. Rumiantceva, & V. Efimova, Weak Segmentation and Unsupervised Evaluation: Application to Froth Flotation Images. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications (Science and Technology Publications, Lda, 2025), pp. 500–507. https://doi.org/10.5220/0013181100003912. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.