EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 676 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 676 (2025) 02005 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 676, 2025
Second Edition International Congress Geomatics in the Service of Land Use Planning (GéoSAT’25)
Article Number 02005
Number of page(s) 10
Section Digital Transformation and Advanced Geomatics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202567602005
Published online 12 December 2025
  1. F. Tarsha Kurdi, M. Rehor, T. Landes, P. Grussenmeyer, H.-P. Baehr, Extension of an automatic building extraction technique to airborne laser scanner data containing damaged buildings. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. 36-1/W51, (2012), source: OAI [Google Scholar]
  2. S. Ghaffarian, N. Kerle, Towards post-disaster debris identification for precise damage and recovery assessments from UAV and satellite images. in International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives. International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. pp. 297-302 (2019), DOI:10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W13-297-2019 [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Rehor, H. Bähr, F. Tarsha Kurdi, T. Landes, P. Grussenmeyer, Contribution of two plane detection algorithms to recognition of intact and damaged buildings in lidar data. The Photogrammetric Record. vol. 23, pp. 441-456 (2008), DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-9730.2008.00501.x [Google Scholar]
  4. Ö. Canözü, H. Acar, Rapid automatic detection of collapsed buildings with single period LiDAR data after an earthquake. Earth Sci Inform. Vol, 18 (2025), DOI: 10.1007/s12145-024-01659-y [Google Scholar]
  5. F. Nex, D. Duarte, F.-G. Tonolo, N. Kerle, Structural building damage detection with deep learning: Assessment of a state-of-the-art CNN in operational conditions. Remote Sens (Basel). vol. 11, no. 23(2019), DOI: 10.3390/rs11232765 [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Al Shafian, D. Hu, Integrating Machine Learning and Remote Sensing in Disaster Management: A Decadal Review of Post-Disaster Building Damage Assessment. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). 2024, 14, 2344, DOI: 10.3390/buildings14082344 [Google Scholar]
  7. L. Jeftic, J. Knezevic, N. Jeftic, Remote Sensing of Natural and Man-made Disasters. Annals of MIRCE Science. MSA2024-9-5. (2024) [Google Scholar]
  8. C. Shen, Z. Lin, S. Zhou, X. Luo, Y. Zhang, Designing an Efficient Emergency Response Airborne Mapping System with Multiple Sensors. Int J Opt, vol. (2021), DOI: 10.1155/2021/3228291 [Google Scholar]
  9. H. Xia, J. Wu, J. Yao, H. Zhu, A. Gong, J. Yang, L. Hu, F. Mo, A Deep Learning Application for Building Damage Assessment Using Ultra-High-Resolution Remote Sensing Imagery in Turkey Earthquake. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science. vol. 14. no. 6, pp 947-962 (2023), DOI: 10.1007/s13753-023-00526-6 [Google Scholar]
  10. S. McTegg, F. Tarsha Kurdi, S. Simmons, Z. Gharineiat, Comparative Approach of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Restrictions in Controlled Airspaces. Remote Sens (Basel). vol. 14, p. 822 (2022), DOI: 10.3390/rs14040822 [Google Scholar]
  11. D. Duarte, F. Nex, N. Kerle, G. Vosselman, Towards a more efficient detection of earthquake induced façade damages using oblique UAV imagery. International Archives of the Photogrammetry. Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences . ISPRS Archives. International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. pp. 93, 100 (2017), DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W6-93-2017 [Google Scholar]
  12. H. Xia, J. Wu, J. Yao, H. Zhu, A. Gong, J. Yang, L. Hu, F. Mo, A Deep Learning Application for Building Damage Assessment Using Ultra-High-Resolution Remote Sensing Imagery in Turkey Earthquake. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science. vol. 14. no. 6, pp 947-962 (2023), DOI: 10.1007/s13753-023-00526-6 [Google Scholar]
  13. A.-K. Singh, Case study of Satellite Remote Sensing Applications in Natural Disaster Management. Conference: AvH (International) colloquium on CLIMATE, WATER AND ENVIRONMENT, (2019), DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17792.79365 [Google Scholar]
  14. S. Jia, S. Chu, Q. Hou, J. Liu. Application of Remote Sensing Image Change Detection Algorithm in Extracting Damaged Buildings in Earthquake Disaster. IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 149308-149319, 2024, DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3465027 [Google Scholar]
  15. C. Kathiresan. V.B.M. Sayana. Disaster management using Remote Sensing on Unsupervised Data. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering. vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 3412-3415(2019), DOI: 10.35940/ijitee.B6290.129219 [Google Scholar]
  16. Z. Chen, Application of UAV remote sensing in natural disaster monitoring and early warning: an example of flood and mudslide and earthquake disasters, vol. 85 (2024): 5th International Conference on Computer Science and Intelligent Communication (CSIC 2023), DOI: 10.54097/zak5hp77 [Google Scholar]
  17. L. Ke, Exploring the Application of Remote Sensing Technology in Natural Disaster Monitoring. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, vol 108, 2024, DOI: 10.54097/9vy8jq36 [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Hatami, Applications of Deep Learning and Remote Sensing in Disaster Management Cycle. Master's Thesis in Civil Engineering for Risk Mitigation, POLITesi (2024), DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.1814L22241 [Google Scholar]
  19. F. Nex, D. Duarte, A. Steenbeek, N. Kerle, Towards real-time building damage mapping with low-cost UAV solutions. MDPI AG. (2019). DOI: 10.3390/rs11030287 [Google Scholar]
  20. Z. Gharineiat, F. Tarsha-Kurdi, G. Campbell, Review of Automatic Processing of Topography and Surface Feature Identification LiDAR Data Using Machine Learning Techniques. Remote Sens (Basel). vol. 14, p. 4685(2022). DOI: 10.3390/rs14194685 [Google Scholar]
  21. M. Ma, Application of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sensing System in Low Temperature Rain, Snow and Ice Disaster Monitoring. Applied and Computational Engineering. 126. 102-108 (2025), DOI: 10.54254/2755-2721/2025.20025 [Google Scholar]
  22. Z.-Q. Chen, M. Glasscoe, R. Eguchi, C. Huyck, B. Kar, ROLES OF REMOTE SENSING TECHNOLOGIES FOR DISASTER RESILIENCE. in Objective Resilience: Technology. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), pp. 121-160 (2022), DOI: 10.1061/9780784415900.ch5 [Google Scholar]
  23. F. Tarsha-Kurdi, T. Landes, P. Grussenmeyer, Extended RANSAC algorithm for automatic detection of building roof planes from LiDAR DATA. The Photogrammetric Journal of Finland. vol. 21, pp. 97-109(2008), Source: OAI [Google Scholar]
  24. M.-H. Zulkifli, K.-N. Tahar, The Influence of UAV Altitudes and Flight Techniques in 3D Reconstruction Mapping. Drones. vol.7, no.4(2023), DOI: 10.1007/s11629-024-9436-8 [Google Scholar]
  25. E. Aroni, C. Ioannidis, AUTOMATED BUILDING DETECTION IN DENSE POINT CLOUD AND UPDATE OF OPEN SOURCE DATA BASES. ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. vol. XLII-4/W10, pp. 11-18(2018), DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W10-11-2018 [Google Scholar]
  26. M. Zeybek , I. Şanlioglu, Point cloud filtering on UAV based point cloud. Measurement (Lond). vol. 133, pp. 99-111(2019), DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2018.10.013 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.