Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 677, 2025
The 3rd International Conference on Disaster Mitigation and Management (3rd ICDMM 2025)
Article Number 06009
Number of page(s) 7
Section Physical Infrastructure Management and Recovery
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202567706009
Published online 12 December 2025
  1. A. W. Lacey, W. Chen, H. Hao, and K. Bi, Lateral behaviour of modular steel building with simplified models of new inter-module connections. Eng. Struct. 236 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112103 [Google Scholar]
  2. V. Mohsenian, R. Filizadeh, I. Hajirasouliha, and R. Garcia, Seismic performance assessment of eccentrically braced steel frames with energy-absorbing links under sequential earthquakes. J. of Buil. Eng. 33 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101576 [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Bosco, Influence of uncertainties on the seismic performance assessment of chevron braced frames. Eng. Struct. 294 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116594 [Google Scholar]
  4. J. Li, W. Wang, and P. Li, Development, testing and performance evaluation of steel beam-through framed connections with curved knee braces for improving seismic performance. J. Constr. Steel. Res. 79 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.106552 [Google Scholar]
  5. R. A. Fitrah and Masrilayanti, Seismic performance of special steel moment resisting frame building with consideration of setback irregularities. in AIP Conference Proceedings, American Institute of Physics Inc., Jun. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0114899 [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Hammad and M. A. Moustafa, Numerical analysis of special concentric braced frames using experimentally-validated fatigue and fracture model under short and long duration earthquakes. Bull. of Eart. Eng. 19(1), 287–316 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00997-8 [Google Scholar]
  7. AISC, Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings supersedes the seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. (2016) [Online]. Available: www.aisc.org. [Google Scholar]
  8. M. N. Wijaya, L. Susanti, and F. P. Pinontoan, Comparison of strain histories on reinforced concrete eccentric braced frame (EBF) with vertical and horizontal link. Rek. Sip., 19(2), 169–177 (2025). https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.rekayasasipil.2025.019.02.5 [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Elgammal, S. El-Khoriby, and A. Seleemah, Seismic retrofitting of existing reinforced concrete buildings using aluminium shear links and eccentric steel chevron braces. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 49(10), 1–35 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-024-08908-8 [Google Scholar]
  10. K. T. Htay, J. Tanjung, Masrilayanti, M. Olivia, F. Mohamed Nazri, and M. Bur, A proposed fragility curve based on PO-ID hybrid analysis for seismic assessment performance of the reinforced concrete continuous bridges in earthquake prone area. Buildings, 14(12), (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14123875 [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Fasan, R. Del Bello, G. Smiroldo, and C. Bedon, Fragility assessment and q-behaviour factor of concentrically braced steel frames under seismic sequences based on cloud analysis. Structures, 72 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2025.108211 [Google Scholar]
  12. P. C. Hsiao and C. Y. Li, Seismic performance assessments of naturally buckling braced frame building structures. J. of Buil. Eng. 63 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105523 [Google Scholar]
  13. M. S. Khan, A. Basit, M. Rizwan, and N. Ahmad, Seismic fragility functions for RC as-built and eccentric steel brace frames. Structures, 50, 1338–1352 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.02.104 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.