EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 678 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 678 (2025) 02006 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 678, 2025
The 2nd International EcoHarmony Summit (IES 2025): Green Transitions and Innovations for a Sustainable Tomorrow
Article Number 02006
Number of page(s) 9
Section Environmental Conservation and Circular Economy
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202567802006
Published online 16 December 2025
  1. J. L. Provis and S. A. Bernai, Geopolymers and related alkali-activated materials, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 44, 299–327, (2014). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-matsci-070813-113515. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. R. E. Lyon, P. N. Balaguru, A. Foden, U. Sorathia, J. Davidovits, and M. Davidovics, Fire-resistant aluminosilicate composites, Fire Mater. 21(2), 67–73, (1997). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1018(199703)21:2<67::AID-FAM596>3.0.CO;2-N. [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Davidovits, Properties of Geopolymer Cements, First Int. Conf. Alkaline Cem. Concr. 131–149, (1994). [Google Scholar]
  4. K. Neupane, High-Strength Geopolymer Concrete- Properties, Advantages and Challenges. Adv. Mater. 7(2), 15–25, (2018). https://doi.org/10.11648/j.am.20180702.11. [Google Scholar]
  5. W. K. Part, M. Ramli, and C. B. Cheah, An overview on the influence of various factors on the properties of geopolymer concrete derived from industrial by-products. Constr. Build. Mater. 77, 370–395, (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.065. [Google Scholar]
  6. H. Ulugöl et al., Mechanical and microstructural characterization of geopolymers from assorted construction and demolition waste-based masonry and glass. J. Clean. Prod. 280, 124358, (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/jjclepro.2020.124358. [Google Scholar]
  7. Y. D. Adufu, S. O. Sore, P. Nshimiyimana, A. Messan, And G. Escadeillas, Effect of calcium-rich additions on the mechanical and microstructural properties of metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete cured in ambient sub-Saharan climate. Constr. Build. Mater. 453, 139009, (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.139009. [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Ohno and V. C. Li, A feasibility study of strain hardening fiber reinforced fly ash-based geopolymer composites. Constr. Build. Mater. 57, 163–168, (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.02.005. [Google Scholar]
  9. H. Ulugöl, M. F. Günal, I.Ö. Yaman, G. Yildinm, and M. Çahmaran, Effects of self-healing on the microstructure, transport, and electrical properties of 100% construction-and demolition-waste-based geopolymer composites. Cem. Concr. Compos. 121, 104081, (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104081. [Google Scholar]
  10. N. C. Demiral et al., Mechanical anisotropy evaluation and bonding properties of 3D-printable construction and demolition waste-based geopolymer mortars. Cem. Concr. Compos. 134, 104814, (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104814. [Google Scholar]
  11. K. Neupane, Evaluation of environmental sustainability of one-part geopolymer binder concrete. Clean. Mater. 6(2), 100138, (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clema.2022.100138. [Google Scholar]
  12. B. Sari, §. Y. Geyik, and O. Keskinkan, Çimento Üretim Sektöründe ISO 14001 Çevre Yönetim Sisteminin Enerji Kazanimi ve iklim Degiçikligi Üzerine Etkilerinin incelenmesi. Çukurova Univ. J. Fac. Eng. Archit. 35(4), 847–858, (2020). https://doi.org/10.21605/cukurovaummfd.867373 [Google Scholar]
  13. D. A. Salas, A. D. Ramirez, N. Ulloa, H. Baykara, and A. J. Boero, Life cycle assessment of geopolymer concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 190, 170–177, (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.123. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. T. Luukkonen, Z. Abdollahnejad, J. Yliniemi, P. Kinnunen, and M. Illikainen, Comparison of alkali and silica sources in one-part alkali-activated blast furnace slag mortar. J. Clean. Prod. 187, 171–179, (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/jjclepro.2018.03.202. [Google Scholar]
  15. H. Y. Zhang, J. C. Liu, and B. Wu, Mechanical properties and reaction mechanism of one-part geopolymer mortars. Constr. Build. Mater. 273, 121973, (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121973. [Google Scholar]
  16. Y. Chen et al., Synthesis, solubility and thermodynamic properties of N-A-S-H gels with various target Si/Al ratios. Cem. Concr. Res. 180, 107484, (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2024.107484. [Google Scholar]
  17. V. F. F. Barbosa, K. J. D. Mackenzie, and C. Thaumaturgo, Synthesis and characterisation of materials based on inorganic polymers of alumina and silica: sodium polysialate polymers. Int. J. Inorg. Mater. 2(4), 309–317, (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1466-6049(00)00041-6. [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Zerzouri, R. Hamzaoui, L. Ziyani, and S. Alehyen, Influence of slag based pre-geopolymer powders obtained by mechanosynthesis on structure, microstructure and mechanical performance of geopolymer pastes. Constr. Build. Mater. 361, 129637, (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129637. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.