EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 678 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 678 (2025) 04001 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 678, 2025
The 2nd International EcoHarmony Summit (IES 2025): Green Transitions and Innovations for a Sustainable Tomorrow
Article Number 04001
Number of page(s) 12
Section Green Management and Business Innovation - 1
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202567804001
Published online 16 December 2025
  1. De Pascale, A., Di Vita, G., Giannetto, C., Ioppolo, G., Lanfranchi, M., Limosani, M., & Szopik-Depczyfiska, K. The circular economy implementation at the European Union level. Past, present and future. Journal of Cleaner Production, 423, 138658. (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/jjclepro.2023.138658 [Google Scholar]
  2. Mondal, S., Singh, S., & Gupta, H. Green entrepreneurship and digitalization enabling the circular economy through sustainable waste management - An exploratory study of emerging economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 422, 138433. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138433 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Schöggl, J.-P., Stumpf, L., & Baumgartner, R. J. The narrative of sustainability and circular economy - A longitudinal review of two decades of research. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 163, 105073. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105073 [Google Scholar]
  4. Rodriguez-Espindola, O., Cuevas-Romo, A., Chowdhury, S., Diaz-Acevedo, N., Albores, P., Despoudi, S., Malesios, C., & Dey, P. The role of circular economy principles and sustainable-oriented innovation to enhance social, economic and environmental performance: Evidence from Mexican SMEs. International Journal of Production Economics, 248. 108495. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/jijpe.2022.108495 [Google Scholar]
  5. Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup Republik Indonesia, Pedoman Pelaksanaan Reduce, Reuse, dan Recycle melalui Bank Sampah, (2012) [Google Scholar]
  6. T. Saputra, S. Zuhdi, R. Affrian, K. Amri, R.A. Putri, Civil Society Participation in Natural Resource Management in Conservation Areas: an Empirical Study of Tesso Nilo National Park, Riau Province, Indonesia. Public Adm. Issues. 5, 48–68 (2023) https://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2023-0-5-48-68 [Google Scholar]
  7. Xu, Z., Li, Y., Wang, C., & Shan, J. Social capital and environmentally friendly behaviors. Environmental Science & Policy, 151, 103612. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.103612 [Google Scholar]
  8. Ö. Bodin, M.M. Garcia, G. Robins, Reconciling Conflict and Cooperation in Environmental Governance : A Social Network Perspective. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 95, (2020). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-011020-064352 [Google Scholar]
  9. K. Lehtonen, P. Uusikylä, How Do Networks Reflect Collaborative Governance ? The Case of a Sport Policy Program. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 18, 7229 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147229 [Google Scholar]
  10. W. Wu, F. He, T. Zhuang, Y. Yi, Stakeholder Analysis and Social Network Analysis in the Decision-Making of Industrial Land Redevelopment in China : The Case of Shanghai. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 17, 9206 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249206 [Google Scholar]
  11. Y. Zhou, H. Wang, Z. Wang, X. Dai, The Improvement Path for Regionally Coordinated Green Development : Evidence from Social Network Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 19, 11703 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811703 [Google Scholar]
  12. A.Y. Alhassan, Rethinking participation in urban planning : analytical and practical contributions of social network analysis. Front. Urban Rural Plan. 3, 1 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44243-024-00052-z [Google Scholar]
  13. H.H. Wicaksana, C. Parmanto, M. Fauzi, The Context of the Collaborative Governance Systems in Organic Waste Management is a Public Service in the Urban Area of Lebak Regency, J. Manaj. Pelayanan Publik. 9, 2 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  14. M.J. Zapata Campos, S. Carenzo, P. Zapata, Inclusive recycling movements : a green deep democracy from below. Environ. Urban. 33, 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247820967621 [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Ndam, A. F. Touikoue, J. Chenal, J. C. B. Munyaka, A. Kemajou, Urban Governance of Household Waste and Sustainable Development in Sub-Saharan Africa : A Study from Yaound é (Cameroon). Waste. 1, (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/waste1030036 [Google Scholar]
  16. P.J. Carrington, J. Scott and S. Wasserman, Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis (Cambridge University Press, 2005). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811395 [Google Scholar]
  17. Bokhove, C., Brouwer, J., & Downey, C. Longitudinal social network methods for the educational and psychological sciences. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, (2025). https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2025.2478927. [Google Scholar]
  18. T. Saputra, Nurpeni, Eka, S. Zuhdi, Mapping Power Dynamics in Local Climate Action: Policy Networks in the Climate Village Program of Pekanbaru City, Riau. Challenges Sustain. 12, 4 (2024). https://doi.org/10.56578/cis120401 [Google Scholar]
  19. Geeraert, A. The dark side of governance networks: how private actors use discursive strategies in global sport governance. Public Management Review, 27, (2025). https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2025.2456034 [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Zuhdi, B. Rusli, R. A. Buchari, Y.S. Sugandi, Dynamic Policy Network of Urban Slum Settlement Collaboration: A Case Study of Pekanbaru, Riau Province, Indonesia; Overview: Dynamic Policy Network of Urban Slum Settlement Collaboration. Int. Rev. Spat. Plan. Sustain. Dev. 11, (2023). https://doi.org/10.14246/irspsd. 11.4 167 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kusumawardhani, F., & Pradhana, A. Sustainable Tourism: Re-Mapping Stakeholders in the Darma Reservoir Tourism Attraction. E3S Web of Conferences, 593, 07001. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202459307001 [Google Scholar]
  22. Morrison, T. H., Bodin, Ö., Cumming, G. S., Lubell, M., Seppelt, R., Seppelt, T., & Weible, C. M. Building blocks of polycentric governance. Policy Studies Journal, 51, (2023). https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12492 [Google Scholar]
  23. Wang, H., & Ran, B. Network governance and collaborative governance: a thematic analysis on their similarities, differences, and entanglements. Public Management Review, 25, (2023) https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.2011389. [Google Scholar]
  24. Y. Arai, Maswadi, S. Oktoriana, A. Suharyani, Didik, M. Inoue, How can we mitigate power imbalances in collaborative environmental governance? Examining the role of the village facilitation team approach observed in west Kalimantan, Indonesia. Sustain. 13, (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073972 [Google Scholar]
  25. N.K.M. Khair, K.E. Lee, M. Mokhtar, Community-based monitoring for environmental sustainability: A review of characteristics and the synthesis of criteria. J. Environ. Manage. 289, 112491 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/jjenvman.2021.112491 [Google Scholar]
  26. S. Zuhdi, B. Rusli, R. A. Buchari, Y.S. Sugandi, D. Suryana, Policy Network in the Kota Tanpa Kumuh (Kotaku) Program in Pekan Baru City, Riau Province, Indonesia. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Plan. 19, 8 (2024). https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.190830 [Google Scholar]
  27. M.T. Imperial, S. Ospina, E. Johnston, R. O'Leary, J. Thomsen, P. Williams, S. Johnson, Understanding leadership in a world of shared problems: Advancing network governance in large landscape conservation. Front. Ecol. Environ. 14, 3 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1248. [Google Scholar]
  28. W. Zhang, Y. Wang, E. Li, C. Zhang, H. Li, S. Hada, Evolutionary mechanism of trust for public-private partnership projects with public participation. Buildings. 15, 3 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15030391 [Google Scholar]
  29. M. de Koning, J. W. K. Parr, S. Sengchanthavong, S. Phommasane, Collaborative governance improves management effectiveness of hin nam no national protected area in central lAO PDR. Parks. 22, 2 (2016). https://doi.org.10.2305/iucn.ch.2016.parks-22-2mdk.en [Google Scholar]
  30. M.A. Cebriân-Piqueras, I. Palomo, V.B. Lo, M.D. Löpez-Rodriguez, A. Filyushkina, M. Fischborn, C.M. Raymond, T. Plieninger, Leverage points and levers of inclusive conservation in protected areas. Ecol. Soc. 28, (2023). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-14366-280407 [Google Scholar]
  31. E. Sorensen, J. Torfing, Radical and disruptive answers to downstream problems in collaborative governance? Public Manag. Rev. 23, 11 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1879914 [Google Scholar]
  32. C.A. Ionescu, L. Paschia, N.L.G. Nicolau, S.G. Stanescu, V.M.N. Stancescu, M.D. Coman, M.C. Uzlau, Sustainability analysis of the e-learning education system during pandemic period—covid-19 in Romania. Sustain. 12, 21 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219030 [Google Scholar]
  33. K. Shafique, S. Shams, T. Sarker, A Framework to assess possible sources of stakeholder exploitation: a developing country case. Int. J. Disaster Risk Sci. 15, 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-024-00538-w [Google Scholar]
  34. J. Hillo, I. Vento, S. Sjöblom, Collaboration or hierarchy: experimental evidence on governance modes and legitimacy perceptions. J. Public Aff. 24, 4 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2952 [Google Scholar]
  35. M.T. Ziegler, Critical intuitions in stakeholder theory and political csr: the effect of identity constituting values on the dynamics of business ethical debates. Humanist. Manag. J. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41463-024-00204-9 [Google Scholar]
  36. Li, Y., Zhu, P., Mlecnik, E., Qian, Q. K., & Visscher, H. J. Dissemination, manipulation or monopolization? Understanding the influence of stakeholder information sharing on resident participation in neighborhood rehabilitation of urban China. Land Use Policy, 147, 107359, (2024) [Google Scholar]
  37. A. Chernyi, J. Uotila, Prioritization of organizational stakeholders: a managerial decision-making perspective. J. Bus. Res. 185, 114882 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/i.ibusres.2024.114882 [Google Scholar]
  38. Wang, J., Nie, Y., Guo, M., & Liu, H. Digital Orientation and Innovation Outputs in Collaboration Networks: Inside the Black Box. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15, (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01104-3 [Google Scholar]
  39. R. Basyar, A. Puspaningtyas, Collaborative governance in CSR management program for slum area rehabilitation. Publisia J. Ilmu Adm. Publik. 7, 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.26905/pjiap.v7i1.7480 [Google Scholar]
  40. I Purnama, A Mutamima, K Sari, W Masrul, Community-Based Landscape Intervention for Informal Waste Site Restoration Using Telajakan-Inspired Ecological Design in Urban Indonesia. Environ. Manag. 75, 3234–3247, (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-025-02219-w [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.