EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 678 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 678 (2025) 07001 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 678, 2025
The 2nd International EcoHarmony Summit (IES 2025): Green Transitions and Innovations for a Sustainable Tomorrow
Article Number 07001
Number of page(s) 15
Section Community Empowerment and Inclusive Transitions
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202567807001
Published online 16 December 2025
  1. A. H. GhaffarianHoseini, U. Berardi, N. D. Dahlan, and A. GhaffarianHoseini, "What can we learn from Malay vernacular houses?," Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 13, pp. 157–170, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2014.04.008 [Google Scholar]
  2. N. Junara and Y. E. Putrie, Rumah Ramah Lingkungan: Interpretasi Arsitektural Konsep Islam dalam Hunian. Malang, Indonesia: UIN-Maliki Press, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  3. N. Huda, M. Razali, and A. Talib, "Aspects of privacy in Muslim Malay traditional dwelling interiors in Melaka," Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 105, pp. 644–654, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.067 [Google Scholar]
  4. Z. Othman, R. Aird, and L. Buys, "Privacy, modesty, hospitality, and the design of Muslim homes," Frontiers of Architectural Research, vol. 4, pp. 12–23, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2014.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Omer, "The concepts of God, man, and the environment in Islam: Implications for Islamic architecture," Journal of Islamic Architecture, vol. 2, pp. 1–12, 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.18860/jia.v2i1.1778 [Google Scholar]
  6. Y. Yulianto, Fikih Arsitektur Islam. Malang, Indonesia: UIN-Maliki Press, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  7. F. Zubaidi, "Arsitektur Kaili sebagai proses dan produk vernacular," Jurnal Ruang, vol. 1, pp. 27–37, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  8. H. Mortada, Traditional Islamic Principles of Built Environment. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Bokhari, M. T. M. Hammad, and D. Beggas, "Impact of Islamic values and concepts in architecture," WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, vol. 241, pp. 383–396, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP200311 [Google Scholar]
  10. N. Yassin and N. Utaberta, "Architecture in the Islamic civilization: Muslim building or Islamic architecture," Journal of Islamic Architecture, vol. 2, pp. 52–60, 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.18860/jia.v2i2.2202 [Google Scholar]
  11. W. Nurjayanti, Konsep Arsitektur Islam. Surakarta, Indonesia: Muhammadiyah University Press, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  12. L. Groat and D. Wang, Architectural Research Methods, 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  13. L. Belmessaoud-Boukhalfa, The ethical dimension of Islamic urban architectural heritage as sustainable design. WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ. 155, 917–928 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2495/SC120772 [Google Scholar]
  14. T. Said, The adaptation of Malay philosophy values through maritime education. BIO Web Conf. 79, 06001 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20237906001 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  15. E. Zuraidi, R. Zainol, Y. Ahmad, A. Achmad, Determinants of spatial planning for urban resilience in Islamic society. Plan. Malays. 21, 222–236 (2023). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i29.1367 [Google Scholar]
  16. Eltrapolsi, K. Mahmoud, H. Altan, A review of geometric proportions of courtyard shaping in traditional architecture. Heritage 5, 2282–2297 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage5030119 [Google Scholar]
  17. X. Zhang, J. Zhong, Thermal comfort evaluation of Huizhou folk dwelling houses," Int. J. Heat Technol. 40, 993–1000 (2022). https://doi.org/10.18280/ijht.400417 [Google Scholar]
  18. E. Zwain, A. Bahauddin, Architectural identity design of shophouses in George Town heritage city. Int. J. Des. 1, 7–16 (2021). https://doi.org/10.34010/injudes.v1i1.4825 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.