EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 679 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 679 (2025) 01002 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 679, 2025
The 6th Research, Invention, and Innovation Congress (RI2C 2025)
Article Number 01002
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202567901002
Published online 18 December 2025
  1. T. Skytt, S. N. Nielsen, B.-G. Jonsson, Global warming potential and absolute global temperature change potential from carbon dioxide and methane fluxes as indicators of regional sustainability – A case study of Jämtland, Sweden. Ecol. Indic. 110, 105831 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105831 [Google Scholar]
  2. Y. B. Zeldovich, ZELDOVICH 1959. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 36, 964 (1959) [Google Scholar]
  3. D. Erdemir, I. Dincer, A perspective on the use of ammonia as a clean fuel: Challenges and solutions., John Wiley & Sons. Inc. Chichester, UK., 2021 [Google Scholar]
  4. H. Xiao, A. Valera-Medina, P. J. Bowen, Study on premixed combustion characteristics of co-firing ammonia/methane fuels. Energy. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.08.077 [Google Scholar]
  5. I. Nova, E. Tronconi, Urea-SCR Technology for deNOx After Treatment of Diesel Exhausts. Johnson Matthey Technol. Rev. 59, 221–232 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-8071-7 [Google Scholar]
  6. R. Villamaina, I. Nova, E. Tronconi, T. Maunula, M. Keenan, Effect of the NH4NO3 Addition on the Low-T NH3-SCR Performances of Individual and Combined Feand Cu-Zeolite Catalysts. Emiss. Control Sci. Technol.. 5, 290–296 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40825-019-00140-3 [Google Scholar]
  7. C.-N. Kuo, C.-S. Li, Y.-L. Lai, S.-I. Yen, Metal-Doped Mesoporous MnO2-CeO2 Catalysts for Low-Temperature Pre-Oxidation of NO to NO2 in Fast SCR Process. (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13040694 [Google Scholar]
  8. W.-J. Li, T.-Y. Li, M.-Y. Wey, Preferred enhancement of fast-SCR by Mn/CeSiOx catalyst: Study on Ce/Si promotion and shape dependence. Chem. Eng. J. 403, 126317 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.126317 [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Okubo, T. Kuwahara, Chapter 3 - Principle and design of emission control systems. M. Okubo and T. B. T.-N. T. for E. C. in M. D. E. Kuwahara, Eds. Butterworth-Heinemann. 53–143. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812307-2.00003-1 [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Okubo, T. Kuwahara, Chapter 4 - Operation examples of emission control systems. M. Okubo and T. B. T.-N. T. for E. C. in M. D. E. Kuwahara. Eds. Butterworth-Heinemann. 145–210. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812307-2.00004-3 [Google Scholar]
  11. N. Osawa, T. Tsuji, R. Ogiso, Y. Yoshioka, Effect of nitrogen addition to ozone generation characteristics by diffuse and filamentary dielectric barrier discharges at atmospheric pressure*. Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 78, (2017). [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1051/epjap/2017160471 [Google Scholar]
  12. K.-M. Lin, T.-Y. Liao, J.-Y. Lin, M. Abrar, Y.-X. Chen, Analysis of ozone generation in a planar atmospheric pressure air dielectric barrier discharge reactor. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 32, 25007 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6595/acb812 [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Tański, A. Reza, D. Przytuła, K. Garasz, Ozone Generation by Surface Dielectric Barrier Discharge. Appl. Sci. 13, (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/app13127001 [Google Scholar]
  14. L. Wei, H. Deng, G. Neretti, Y. Zhang, Ozone yield limit in low temperature plasmas based on thermodynamics. Eur. Phys. J. D. 73, 136 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2019-90560-y [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Zhang et al., Intensification of NOx Conversion over Activated Coke by Ozone Oxidation for Sintering Flue Gas at Low Temperatures. ACS Omega. 6, 13484–13495 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c01722 [Google Scholar]
  16. Y. Nie, L. Xu, Y. Yang, D. He, Y. Mei, Mechanism investigation on yellow phosphorus inducing O, O3 and OH• radicals in phosphate rock slurry for high-efficiency NO oxidation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 312, 123435 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2023.123435 [Google Scholar]
  17. L. Liu, B. Shen, M. Si, F. Lu, Performance and mechanism of MnOx/γ-Al2O3 for low-temperature NO catalytic oxidation with O3/NO ratio of 0.5. Fuel Process. Technol. 222, 106979 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2021.106979 [Google Scholar]
  18. Z. Zhang, H. Xi, S. Zhou, W. Zhou, M. Shreka, Efficient removal of NOx from simulated marine exhaust by using O3-Na2SO3: Experimental factors and optimization analysis. Fuel. 313, 122659 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122659 [Google Scholar]
  19. F. Meng et al., Promotional effect of surface fluorine on TiO2: Catalytic conversion of O3 and H2O2 into ·OH and ·O2− radicals for high-efficiency NO oxidation. Chem. Eng. J. 424, 130358 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.130358 [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Bhowmick, A. Badiwal, K. T. Shenoy, Removal of NOx using ozone injection and subsequent absorption in water. Chem. Eng. J. Adv. 15, 100511 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceja.2023.100511 [Google Scholar]
  21. M. Holub, S. Kalisiak, T. Borkowski, J. Myskow, R. Brandenburg, The Influence of Direct Non-Thermal Plasma Treatment on Particulate Matter (PM) and NOx in the Exhaust of Marine Diesel Engines. Polish J. Environ. Stud. 19, 1199–1211 (2010). [Online]. Available: http://apps.webofknowledge.com/full_record.do?product=UA&search_mode=GeneralSearch&qid=1&SID=R2NLPhmYMEEtpS9Gxa8&page=1&doc=9 [Google Scholar]
  22. H. Yamasaki et al., Pilot-Scale NOx and SOx Aftertreatment by Semi-Dry Plasma-Chemical Hybrid Process in Glass-Melting-Furnace Exhaust Gas. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 42, 51–71 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-021-10193-4 [Google Scholar]
  23. S. Jodzis, M. Zięba, Energy efficiency of an ozone generation process in oxygen. Analysis of a pulsed DBD system. Vacuum. 155, 29–37 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2018.05.035 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. R. A. Bryant, Uncertainty estimates of tracer gas dilution flow measurements in large-scale exhaust ducts. Flow Meas. Instrum. 61, 1–8 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2018.03.004 [Google Scholar]
  25. M. Si et al., Review on the NO removal from flue gas by oxidation methods. J. Environ. Sci., 101, 49–71 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2020.08.004 [Google Scholar]
  26. K.-M. Lin, K.-C. Wang, Y.-S. Chang, S.-Y. Chuang, Gas Heating Mechanisms in Atmospheric Pressure Helium Dielectric-Barrier Discharges Driven by a kHz Power Source. (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/app10217583 [Google Scholar]
  27. Z. Zhu, B. Xu, Purification Technologies for NOx Removal from Flue Gas: A Review. (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/separations9100307 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.