EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 679 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 679 (2025) 01019 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 679, 2025
The 6th Research, Invention, and Innovation Congress (RI2C 2025)
Article Number 01019
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202567901019
Published online 18 December 2025
  1. K. O. Yoro, M. O. Daramola, CO2 emission sources, greenhouse gases, and the global warming effect. Adv. Carbon Capture. 3–28 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819657-1.00001-3 [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Audi, A. Ali, M. Kassem, Greenhouse gases: A review of losses and benefits. Int. J. Energy Econ. Policy. 10, 403–418 (2019). https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.8416 [Google Scholar]
  3. Center for Sustainable Systems, Carbon footprint factsheet. University of Michigan (2018) [Google Scholar]
  4. N. E. Selin, Carbon footprint. Encyclopedia Britannica (2024) [Google Scholar]
  5. T. Bennich, N. Weitz, H. Carlsen, Deciphering the scientific literature on SDG interactions: A review and reading guide. Sci. Total Environ. 728, 138405 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138405 [Google Scholar]
  6. P. Pradhan, L. Costa, D. Rybski, W. Lucht, J. P. Kropp, A systematic study of sustainable development goal (SDG) interactions. Earth’s Future. 5, 1169–1179 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000632 [Google Scholar]
  7. F. Rosati, L. Faria, Addressing the SDGs in sustainability reports: The relationship with institutional factors. J. Cleaner Prod. 215, 1312–1326 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.107 [Google Scholar]
  8. W. Zhao, Y. Zou, Green university initiatives in China: A case of Tsinghua University. Int. J. Sustain. Higher Educ. 16, 491–506 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-02-2014-0021 [Google Scholar]
  9. M. M. Ulkhaq, P. Prayogo, M. Firmansyah, D. Agustina, Assessing campus sustainability: A report from Diponegoro University, Indonesia. Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol. 6, 616–621 (2016) https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2016.V6.761 [Google Scholar]
  10. R. Castro, C. Jabbour, Evaluating sustainability of an Indian university. J. Cleaner Prod. 61, 54–58 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.033 [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Syafrudin, B. Zaman, M.A. Budihardjo, S. Yumaroh, D.I. Gita, D.S. Lantip, Carbon footprint of academic activities: A case study in Diponegoro University. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 448, 012008 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/448/1/012008 [Google Scholar]
  12. D. Larson, V. Chang, A review and future direction of agile, business intelligence, analytics and data science. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 36, 700–710 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.04.013 [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Adamala, L. Cidrin, Key success factors in business intelligence (2011) [Google Scholar]
  14. Y. Niu, L. Ying, J. Yang, M. Bao, C. B. Sivaparthipan, Organizational business intelligence and decision making using big data analytics. Inf. Process. Manage. 58, 102725 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102725 [Google Scholar]
  15. Ö. Işık, M.C. Jones, A. Sidorova, Business intelligence success: The roles of BI capabilities and decision environments. Inf. Manage. 50, 13–23 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2012.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  16. K. M. Bartol, D. C. Martin, Management (Irwin/McGraw-Hill, New York, 1999) [Google Scholar]
  17. G. R. Gangadharan, S. N. Swami, Business intelligence systems: design and implementation strategies, in Proceedings of the 26th Int. Conf. Inf. Technol. Interfaces. June 7-10 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  18. R. Sherman, Business intelligence guidebook (Morgan Kaufmann, Amsterdam, 2015) [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Damert, J. Morris, E. Guenther, Carbon footprints of organizations and products. Responsible Consumption and Production, 59–72 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Erhart, K. Erhart, Environmental ranking of European industrial facilities by toxicity and global warming potentials. Sci. Rep. 13, 1772 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  21. P. J. Koiesar, What Deming told the Japanese in 1950. Qual. Manage. J. 2, 9–24 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.1994.11918672 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.