Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 680, 2025
The 4th International Conference on Energy and Green Computing (ICEGC’2025)
Article Number 00079
Number of page(s) 12
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202568000079
Published online 19 December 2025
  1. R. Martínez-Peláez et al., “Role of Digital Transformation for Achieving Sustainability: Mediated Role of Stakeholders, Key Capabilities, and Technology,” Sustain., vol. 15, no. 14, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su151411221. [Google Scholar]
  2. F. Olan, E. Ogiemwonyi Arakpogun, J. Suklan, F. Nakpodia, N. Damij, and U. Jayawickrama, “Artificial intelligence and knowledge sharing: Contributing factors to organizational performance,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 145, no. March 2020, pp. 605–615, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.008. [Google Scholar]
  3. R. C. Climent, D. M. Haftor, and M. W. Staniewski, “AI-enabled business models for competitive advantage,” J. Innov. Knowl., vol. 9, no. 3, p. 100532, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2024.100532. [Google Scholar]
  4. T. K. Gandhi et al., “How can artificial intelligence decrease cognitive and work burden for front line practitioners?,” JAMIA Open, vol. 6, no. 3, 2023, doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad079. [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Rožman, P. Tominc, and B. Milfelner, “Maximizing employee engagement through artificial intelligent organizational culture in the context of leadership and training of employees: Testing linear and non-linear relationships,” Cogent Bus. Manag., vol. 10, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2023.2248732. [Google Scholar]
  6. M.-Á. García-Madurga, A.-I. Gil-Lacruz, I. Saz-Gil, and M. Gil-Lacruz, “The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Improving Workplace Well-Being: A Systematic Review Miguel-Ángel,” Businesses, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 415–423, 2024, doi: 10.1177/15533506241248239. [Google Scholar]
  7. X. Yu, S. Xu, and M. Ashton, “Antecedents and outcomes of artificial intelligence adoption and application in the workplace: the socio-technical system theory perspective,” Inf. Technol. People, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 454–474, 2023, doi: 10.1108/ITP-04-2021-0254. [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Mariappanadar, “Improving Quality of Work for Positive Health: Interaction of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 8 and SDG 3 from the Sustainable HRM Perspective,” Sustain., vol. 16, no. 13, 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16135356. [Google Scholar]
  9. K. Jayalakshmi and N. Jayanthi, “AI-Powered HR: Enhancing Employee Experience and Engagement,” Proc. Int. Conf. Digit. Transform. Bus. Navig. New Front. Beyond Boundaries 2024, no. Dtbnnf, pp. 281–294, 2024, doi: 10.2991/978-94-6463-433-4_20. [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Fiegler-Rudol, K. Lau, A. Mroczek, and J. Kasperczyk, “Exploring Human–AI Dynamics in Enhancing Workplace Health and Safety: A Narrative Review,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 22, no. 2, 2025, doi: 10.3390/ijerph22020199. [Google Scholar]
  11. E. Parry and V. Battista, “The impact of emerging technologies on work: a review of the evidence and implications for the human resource function,” Emerald Open Res., vol. 1, no. September, p. 5, 2019, doi: 10.12688/emeraldopenres.12907.1. [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Khan and Sreevinasan, “Impact of AI on Work Life Balance of Working Women in Hotel Industry,” Int. J. Sci. Res. Eng. Manag., vol. 08, no. 10, pp. 1–23, 2024, doi: 10.55041/IJSREM38120. [Google Scholar]
  13. I. M. Enholm, E. Papagiannidis, P. Mikalef, and J. Krogstie, “Artificial Intelligence and Business Value: a Literature Review,” Inf. Syst. Front., vol. 24, pp. 1709–1734, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2021.11.002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. O. Okuyelu and O. Adaji, “AI-Driven Real-time Quality Monitoring and Process Optimization for Enhanced Manufacturing Performance,” J. Adv. Math. Comput. Sci., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 81–89, 2024, doi: 10.9734/jamcs/2024/v39i41883. [Google Scholar]
  15. A. I. Hauptman, B. G. Schelble, W. Duan, C. Flathmann, and N. J. McNeese, “Understanding the influence of AI autonomy on AI explainability levels in human-AI teams using a mixed methods approach,” Cogn. Technol. Work, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 435–455, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10111-024-00765-7. [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Saleem, C. Chawla, and V. Saxena, “Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Education,” in Recent trends in Management and Commerce, 2024, pp. 92–94. doi: 10.46632/rmc/5/2/20. [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Jetha et al., “Artificial intelligence and the work–health interface: A research agenda for a technologically transforming world of work,” Am. J. Ind. Med., vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 815–830, 2023, doi: 10.1002/ajim.23517. [Google Scholar]
  18. M. M. Sandeep, V. Lavanya, and J. Balakrishnan, “Leveraging AI in recruitment: enhancing intellectual capital through resource-based view and dynamic capability framework,” J. Intellect. Cap., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 404–425, 2025, doi: 10.1108/JIC-05-2024-0155. [Google Scholar]
  19. N. Rulandari and A. D. K. Silalahi, “Human-AI collaboration for efficiency and employee job satisfaction in public administration: insights from a resource-based perspective,” Transform. Gov. People, Process Policy, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 264–287, 2025, doi: 10.1108/TG-01-2025-0011. [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Sonnentag, L. Tay, and H. Nesher Shoshan, “A review on health and well-being at work: More than stressors and strains,” Pers. Psychol., vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 473–510, 2023, doi: 10.1111/peps.12572. [Google Scholar]
  21. N. K. Rajagopal et al., “Future of Business Culture: An Artificial Intelligence-Driven Digital Framework for Organization Decision-Making Process,” Complexity, vol. 2022, 2022, doi: 10.1155/2022/7796507. [Google Scholar]
  22. L. Murphy, “The productivity dilemma: Examining the truth behind automation’s impact on employment, and the mediating role of augmentation,” J. Organ. Anal., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 622–644, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Soulami, S. Benchekroun, and A. Galiulina, “Exploring how AI adoption in the workplace affects employees: a bibliometric and systematic review,” Front. Artif. Intell., vol. 7, no. November, pp. 1–16, 2024, doi: 10.3389/frai.2024.1473872. [Google Scholar]
  24. R. C. Liona and M. S. Yurniardi, “The contribution of work engagement and job satisfaction to workers’ psychological well-being,” Humanit. Indones. Psychol. J., vol. 17, no. 2, p. 94, 2020, doi: 10.26555/humanitas.v0i0.16251. [Google Scholar]
  25. S. Mariappanadar, “Health harm of work from the sustainable HRM perspective: scale development and validation,” Int. J. Manpow., vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 924–944, 2016, doi: 10.1108/IJM-12-2015-0204. [Google Scholar]
  26. Zikmund, Babin Carr, and Griffin, Business Research Methods, 8th ed. South-Western Cengage Learning, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  27. R. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, & R. E., Tatham, “Multivariate data analysis.” Pearson Education Limited, Harlow, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  28. J. F. Hair Jr, G. T. M. Hult, C. M. Ringle, M. Sarstedt, N. P. Danks, and S. Ray, Review of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook. 2021. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2022.2108813. [Google Scholar]
  29. I. Ghozali, Partial Least Squares Menggunakan Program SmartPLS 3.2.9. Jakarta: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  30. PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) International, “Asia Pacific Workforce Hopes and Fears Survey 2023,” no. June. PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) International, pp. 1–25, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/asia-pacific/hope-and-fears/2023/asia-pacific-hopes-and-fears-survey-2023.pdf [Google Scholar]
  31. S. Mariappanadar, “The harm indicators of negative externality of efficiency focused organizational practices,” Int. J. Soc. Econ., vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 209–220, 2012, doi: 10.1108/03068291211199378. [Google Scholar]
  32. J. Wood, J. Oh, J. Park, and W. Kim, “The Relationship Between Work Engagement and Work–Life Balance in Organizations: A Review of the Empirical Research,” Hum. Resour. Dev. Rev., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 240–262, 2020, doi: 10.1177/1534484320917560. [Google Scholar]
  33. F. Y. Lai, H. C. Tang, S. C. Lu, Y. C. Lee, and C. C. Lin, “Transformational Leadership and Job Performance: The Mediating Role of Work Engagement,” SAGE Open, vol. 10, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1177/2158244019899085. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.