EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 680 (2025) E3S Web Conf., 680 (2025) 00123 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 680, 2025
The 4th International Conference on Energy and Green Computing (ICEGC’2025)
Article Number 00123
Number of page(s) 12
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202568000123
Published online 19 December 2025
  1. Hosseini, S.E.; Jafaripanah, S.; Saboohi, Z. Numerical Simulation and Aerodynamic Optimization of Two-Stage Axial High-Pressure Turbine Blades. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2401.02102. [Google Scholar]
  2. Geneid, A.A.; Atia, M.R.A.; Badawy, A. Multi-objective optimization of vertical-axis wind turbine’s blade structure using genetic algorithm. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2022, 69, 137–149. [Google Scholar]
  3. A. El-Nemr, E.A. Ahmed, C. Barris, B. Benmokrane, “Bond-dependent coefficient of glass- and carbon-FRP bars in normal- and high-strength concretes,” Constr. Build. Mater., 113, 77–89 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  4. Ahmadi, P.; Rashidi, M.M.; Nazari, M.A. Aerodynamic Optimal Design of Wind Turbine Blades using Genetic Algorithm. Int. J. Energy Environ. Eng. 2014, 5, 373–380. [Google Scholar]
  5. O. Gouda, A. Hassanein, K. Galal, “Experimental and numerical study on the crack width and deflection performance of GFRP reinforced concrete beams,” Eng. Struct., 283, 115721 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  6. Rashidi, M.M.; Ahmadi, P.; Nazari, M.A. Optimization of blade profile for a horizontal axis wind turbine using genetic algorithm. Energy Convers. Manag. 2013, 70, 147–155. [Google Scholar]
  7. Jafaripanah, S.; Hosseini, S.E.; Saboohi, Z. Aerodynamic optimization of a two-stage axial high-pressure turbine using genetic algorithm. Energy 2022, 238, 46–57. [Google Scholar]
  8. E. B. Moreira, J. de J. A. Baldovino, and R. L. dos S. Izzo, “Transforming Construction and Demolition Waste into Soft-Soil Treatment for Paving Design,” Jun. 18, 2023, Springer Science+Business Media. doi: 10.1007/s10706-023-02503-8 [Google Scholar]
  9. Pholdee, N.; Bureerat, S. Hybrid evolutionary algorithms for structural optimization: A review. Comput. Struct. 2014, 139, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  10. G. Dana Boca and S. Saraçlı, “Environmental Education and Student’s Perception, for Sustainability,” Mar. 14, 2019, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. doi: 10.3390/su11061553. [Google Scholar]
  11. B. McCallum, “Experimental evaluation of the bond dependent coefficient and parameters which influence crack width in GFRP reinforced concrete,” M.A.Sc. thesis, Dalhousie University, Canada (2013) [Google Scholar]
  12. Verstraete, T.; Muller, L.; Mueller, J.D. CAD-Based Adjoint Optimization of the Stresses in a Radial Turbine. In Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2017, Charlotte, NC, USA, 26–30 June 2017. [Google Scholar]
  13. Zielinski, M.; Ziller, G. Noncontact vibration measurements on compressor rotor blades. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2000, 11, 847–856. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Brandstetter, C.; Schneider, A.P.; Fiquet, A.-L.; Paoletti, B.; Billon, K.; Ottavy, X. ECL5/CATANA: ECL5/CATANA: Comparative Analysis of Advanced Blade Vibration Measurement Techniques. In 16th European Turbomachinery Conference, paper n◦ ETC2025-176, Hannover, Germany, 24–28 March 2025. Avaliable online: https://www.euroturbo.eu/publications/conferenceproceedings-repository/ (accessed on 20 June 2025) [Google Scholar]
  15. Franke, D.; Jüngst, M.; Möller, D.; Schiffer, H.-P.; Giersch, T. Influence of pre-swirl, rotor speed and blade count on aeroelastic coupling mechanisms during stall inception of a transonic compressor. In Proceedings of the Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, Online, 21–25 Septembre 2020; GT2020-14105 9p. [Google Scholar]
  16. Bartolo, P. Stereolithographic Processes. In Stereolitography: Materials, Processes and Applications; Bartolo, P., Ed.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2011; pp. 1–36. [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Mehany, H.M. Mohamed, A. El-Safty, B. Benmokrane, “Bond-dependent coefficient and cracking behavior of lightweight self-consolidating concrete (LWSCC) beams reinforced with glass- and basalt-FRP bars,” Constr. Build. Mater., 329, 127130 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  18. Lawson, C.; Ivey P. Turbomachinery blade vibration amplitude measurement through tip timing with capacitance tip clearance probes. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2005, 118, 14–24. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. I. N. Permadi and D. B. Nisa, “A Model Experiment Design Using the Taguchi Method: A Case Study Of Making Concrete Roof,” May 31, 2023. doi: 10.59976/jurit.v1i1.2. [Google Scholar]
  20. Pietropaoli, M.; Ahlfeld, R.; Montomoli, F.; Ciani, A.; d’Ercole, M. Design for Additive Manufacturing: Internal Channel Optimization. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 2017, 139, 102101. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Stapelfeldt, S.; Brandstetter, C. Suppression of Nonsynchronous Vibration Through Intentional Aerodynamic and Structural Mistuning. J. Turbomach. 2022, 144, 021008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kielb, R.; Barter, J.; Thomas, J.; Hall, K. Blade excitation by aerodynamic instabilities: A compressor blade study. In Proceedings of the Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, Atlanta, GA, USA, 16–19 June 2003; GT2003-38634, pp. 399–406. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lee, J.; Francis, J.M.; Wang, L.M. How tonality and loudness of noise relate to annoyance and task performance. Noise Control. Eng. J. 2017, 65, 71–82. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Haddi, Y.; Moumen, A.; Kharchaf, A. Study of A Mobile Robot’s Obstacle Avoidance Behavior in A Radioactive Environment with A High Level of Autonomy. Int. J. Tech. Phys. Probl. Eng. (IJTPE) 2022, 14, 34–41. [Google Scholar]
  25. Moumen, A.; Lakhdar, A.; Mansouri, K. Elastoplastic Behavior of Polybutylene Terephthalate Polyester Bio loaded by Two Sustainable and Ecological Fibers of Animal Origin with Two Numerical Methods. Int. J. Tech. Phys. Probl. Eng. (IJTPE) 2021, 13, 29–37. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.