Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 680, 2025
The 4th International Conference on Energy and Green Computing (ICEGC’2025)
Article Number 00131
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202568000131
Published online 19 December 2025
  1. X. Wang, P. S. Dunston. Design, strategies, and issues towards an augmented reality-based construction training platform. J. Inf. Technol. Constr., 18, 363–379 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  2. Y. Lu, T. Ishida. Implementation and evaluation of a high-presence interior layout simulation system using mixed reality. J. Internet Serv. Inf. Secur., 10(1), 50–63 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  3. R. Volk, J. Stengel, F. Schultmann. Building information modeling (BIM) for existing buildings — Literature review and future needs. Autom. Constr., 38, 109–127 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  4. Y. W. Chow, W. Susilo, J. G. Phillips, J. Baek, E. Vlahu-Gjorgievska. Video games and virtual reality as persuasive technologies for health care: An overview. J. Wirel. Mob. Netw. Ubiquit. Comput. Dependable Appl., 8(3), 18–35 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  5. A. H. G. Abulrub, A. N. Attridge, M. A. Williams. Virtual reality in engineering education: The future of creative learning. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. (iJET), 6(S2), 4–11 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Sharipov, U. Jumanazarov, M. Nizomova. Digital tools for enhancing plant-based nutrition education integrating environmental sustainability. Nat. Eng. Sci., 9(3), 129–143 (2024). https://doi.org/10.28978/nesciences.1581572 [Google Scholar]
  7. C. Boje, A. Guerriero, S. Kubicki, Y. Rezgui. Towards a semantic construction digital twin: Directions for future research. Autom. Constr., 114, 103179 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Sathish Kumar, L. Santhi, A. Senthilkumar. Quantifying the impact of Indian virtual reality research: A scientometric study. Indian J. Inf. Sources Serv., 14(3), 1–5 (2024). https://doi.org/10.51983/ijiss-2024.14.3.01 [Google Scholar]
  9. G. D. Kuh. High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Assoc. Am. Coll. Univ. (2008). [Google Scholar]
  10. K. Saidova, Y. Muydinova, R. Turakulov, U. Jumanazarov, A. Khudoykulov, O. Kholmurodova, K. Zokirov, B. Odilov. Investigating the role of community-based conservation in promoting sustainable wildlife management. Int. J. Aquat. Res. Environ. Stud., 4(S1), 95–100 (2024). https://doi.org/10.70102/IJARES/V4S1/16 [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Zhang, H. Li. Digital twins-driven smart construction: Concepts, technologies, and applications. Autom. Constr., 114, 103132 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  12. P. O. Nwosu, F. C. Adeloye. Transformation leader strategies for successful digital adaptation. Glob. Perspect. Manag., 1(1), 1–16 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  13. R. Sacks, A. Perlman, R. Barak. Construction safety training using immersive virtual reality. Constr. Manag. Econ., 31(9), 1005–1017 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Rao, S. Chatterjee. Application of pressure-driven membrane systems in sustainable brewing practices. Eng. Perspect. Filtr. Sep., 2(2), 1–4 (2025). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.