Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 683, 2026
2025 2nd International Conference on Environment Engineering, Urban Planning and Design (EEUPD 2025)
Article Number 01019
Number of page(s) 13
Section Urban Planning and Spatial Governance
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202668301019
Published online 09 January 2026
  1. Shen, J., Li, Y., & Wang, Y. (2025). Nesting landscape character and personality assessment to intensify rural landscape regionality and uniqueness. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 110, 107705. [Google Scholar]
  2. Jiang, P., Li, M., & Sheng, Y. (2020). Spatial regulation design of farmland landscape around cities in China: A case study of Changzhou City. Cities, 97, 102504. [Google Scholar]
  3. Marshall, F., Dolley, J., Bisht, R., Priya, R., Waldman, L., Randhawa, P., Scharlemann, J., Amerasinghe, P., Saharia, R., Kapoor, A., Rizvi, B., Hamid, Y., Arora, M., Chopra, I., & Sawansi Teresa, K. (2024). Recognising peri-urban ecosystem services in urban development policy and planning: A framework for assessing agri-ecosystem services, poverty and livelihood dynamics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 247, 105042. [Google Scholar]
  4. Xu, M., Niu, L., Wang, X., & Zhang, Z. (2023). Evolution of farmland landscape fragmentation and its driving factors in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Journal of Cleaner Production, 418, 138031. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang, X., Cheng, J., Zhang, J., & Chen, F. (2024). Influences of crop diversification on yield, resource use efficiency, and environmental footprint in farmland landscapes in intensive farming. Science of The Total Environment, 945, 174009. [Google Scholar]
  6. Li, C., Fang, Y., Wang, Y., Xu, Y., Zong, Z., Yang, Y., Wang, C., Ou, Z., & Wang, M. (2024). How can tourism help to revitalize the countryside? Content analysis based on the case of tourism enabling rural revitalization. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(8), 20333–20354. [Google Scholar]
  7. Jiang, S., Li, X., Lin, J., Ji, X., & Ji, W. (2025). Research on restorative perception mechanisms in rural landscapes based on structural equation modelling. Ecological Indicators, 172, 113252. [Google Scholar]
  8. Tang, C., Liu, Y., Wan, Z., & Liang, W. (2023). Evaluation system and influencing paths for the integration of culture and tourism in traditional villages. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 33(12), 2489–2510. [Google Scholar]
  9. Li, Y., Mahamood, A., & Affandy, H. B. (2024). The Role of Government Assistance in Zhanjiang Holistic Tourism Branding. 20. [Google Scholar]
  10. Cui, S., Han, Z., Yan, X., Li, X., Zhao, W., Liu, C., Li, X., & Zhong, J. (2022). Link Ecological and Social Composite Systems to Construct Sustainable Landscape Patterns: A New Framework Based on Ecosystem Service Flows. Remote Sensing, 14(18), Article 18. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang, J., Wang, J., & Xu, J. (2023). Spatio-temporal variation and prediction of ecological quality based on remote sensing ecological index – a case study of Zhanjiang City, China. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 11. [Google Scholar]
  12. Huang, T. L., Chung, H. F., & Chen, X. (2023). Digital modality richness drives vivid memory experience. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 17(6), 921-939. [Google Scholar]
  13. Han, H., Zhang, Y., Jian, Y., & Chen, H. (2025). Study on landscape pattern changes and their correlation with ecosystem services in intensely human-disrupted basins: Evidence from China’s Maotiao River. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 197(5), 592. [Google Scholar]
  14. Han, L., & Zhou, Z. (2024). Identifying the Changes in Ecosystem Services and Human Well-Being under Agricultural Transformation Contexts in Peri-Urban Areas: A Case Study of the Xi’an Metropolitan Zone, China. Land, 13(2), 193., [Google Scholar]
  15. Deng, W., Zhang, Q., Zhang, Z., Li, Y., He, S., & Jiang, Y. (2020). Study on Rural Environment Construction Based on the Development of Traditional Industry——Taking Jiuxian Village of Zhanjiang as an Example. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 446(3), 032011. [Google Scholar]
  16. Liu, M., & Nijhuis, S. (2021). The application of advanced mapping methods and tools for spatial-visual analysis in landscape design practice. Sustainability, 13(14), 7952. [Google Scholar]
  17. Tongyun, W., Wei, Z., & Fei, X. (2024). The Role of Landscape Design in Enhancing Environmental Sustainability and Human Well-being. Adegbola, [Google Scholar]
  18. Plieninger et al., 2020)Plieninger, T., Muñoz-Rojas, J., Buck, L. E., & Scherr, S. J. (2020). Agroforestry for sustainable landscape management. Sustainability Science, 15(5), 1255–1266. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wesemeyer et al. (2023) adopted a multi-objective spatial optimization approach to balance agricultural profitability with avian biodiversity conservation [Google Scholar]
  20. Heiland, S., Günther, M., Holzhauer, B., Kern, F., & Wagner, J. (2025). Changes in Nature Conservation-Relevant Public Participation Processes Through Digitalization: The Case of Germany. Land, 14(2), 305 [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang, Y., Liao, J., Ye, Y., O’Byrne, D., & Scown, M. W. (2024). Implications of policy changes for coastal landscape patterns and sustainability in Eastern China. Landscape Ecology, 39(1), 4. [Google Scholar]
  22. Anwar, R. K., Hadian, M. S. D., & Khadijah, U. L. S. (2020). Building Tourism from the Optimization of the Landscape as a Creative Economic Activity of the Community. Journal of Environmental Management & Tourism, 11(4 (44)), 937-953. [Google Scholar]
  23. Yan, L., Winterbottom, D., & Liu, J. (2023). Towards a “positive landscape”: an integrated theoretical model of landscape preference based on cognitive neuroscience. Sustainability, 15(7), 6141. [Google Scholar]
  24. Fu, F., Deng, S., Wu, D., Liu, W., & Bai, Z. (2022). Research on the spatiotemporal evolution of land use landscape pattern in a county area based on CA-Markov model. Sustainable Cities and Society, 80, 103760. [Google Scholar]
  25. Peroff, D. M., Morais, D. B., Seekamp, E., Sills, E., & Wallace, T. (2020). Assessing residents’ place attachment to the Guatemalan Maya landscape through mixed methods photo elicitation. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(3), 379-402. [Google Scholar]
  26. K’oyoo, E. (2023). Use of photo-elicitation interviews to explore urban landscape identity in the context of urban renewal changes, a case of Kisumu City, Kenya. Acta Structilia, 30(2), 35-60. [Google Scholar]
  27. Dayter, D., Locher, M. A., & Messerli, T. C. (2023). Pragmatics in translation: Mediality, participation and relational work. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  28. Yan, L., Winterbottom, D., & Liu, J. (2023). Towards a “positive landscape”: an integrated theoretical model of landscape preference based on cognitive neuroscience. Sustainability, 15(7), 6141. [Google Scholar]
  29. Mizuuchi, Y., & Son, Y. (2024). What on-site landscape experiences attract potential visitors to a site? A Japan–Korea cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Forest Research, 29(2), 73-80. [Google Scholar]
  30. A. O., Ajenifujah-Abubakar, A. O., & Fadamiro, J. A. (2025). Systematic review on ethics of landscape design practice in the built environment.. [Google Scholar]
  31. Aggarwal, M., Hutchison, B., Wong, S. T., Katz, A., Slade, S., & Snelgrove, D. (2024). What factors are associated with the research productivity of primary care researchers in Canada? A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research, 24(1), 263. [Google Scholar]
  32. Hutchinson, D. A. (2019). Making meaning of meaning-making: Understanding experience through story. In Landscapes, edges, and identity-making (Vol. 33, pp. 79-95). Emerald Publishing Limited. [Google Scholar]
  33. Vissers, N., & Wagemans, J. (2024). Photographs that repulse or entice: Sense-making and emotional experiencing of artistic photographs. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. [Google Scholar]
  34. Conti, E., & Lexhagen, M. (2020). Instagramming nature-based tourism experiences: A netnographic study of online photography and value creation. Tourism Management Perspectives, 34, 100650. [Google Scholar]
  35. Guest, E., Roberts-Mills, W., Zarola, A., & Slater, A. (2025). “It’sa kind of double-edged sword”: exploring the social media-related experiences of adults with visible differences using photo-elicitation interviews. PLoS One, 20(5), e0324938. [Google Scholar]
  36. Clark, C., & Nyaupane, G. P. (2024). Cross-border tourism and community solidarity at a militarized border: A photo elicitation approach. Journal of Travel Research, 63(7), 1776-1796. [Google Scholar]
  37. Shin, H., & Kang, J. (2023). Bridging the gap of bibliometric analysis: The evolution, current state, and future directions of tourism research using ChatGPT. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 57, 40-47. [Google Scholar]
  38. Ekhart, C., Wiarda, S. H., van de Koppel, S., Skalli, S., Alghamdi, W., Menniti-Ippolito, F., ... & van Hunsel, F. (2025). Qualitative interviews with stakeholders in herbal pharmacovigilance and recommendations for best practices to be applied worldwide. Drug Safety, 48(1), 75-86. [Google Scholar]
  39. Ekhart, C., Wiarda, S. H., van de Koppel, S., Skalli, S., Alghamdi, W., Menniti-Ippolito, F., ... & van Hunsel, F. (2025). Qualitative interviews with stakeholders in herbal pharmacovigilance and recommendations for best practices to be applied worldwide. Drug Safety, 48(1), 75-86. [Google Scholar]
  40. Huang, R., Lin, H., Chen, C., Zhang, K., & Zeng, W. (2024, May). PlantoGraphy: Incorporating iterative design process into generative artificial intelligence for landscape rendering. In Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems .pp. 1-19 [Google Scholar]
  41. Krajewski, P., Furmankiewicz, M., Sylla, M., Kołodyńska, I., & Lebiedzińska, M. (2025). Landscape Services from the Perspective of Experts and Their Use by the Local Community: A Comparative Study of Selected Landscape Types in a Region in Central Europe. Sustainability, 17(15), 6998. [Google Scholar]
  42. Basile, G., & Cavallo, A. (2020). Rural identity, authenticity, and sustainability in Italian inner areas. Sustainability, 12(3), 1272.Zhang et al., 2022; Yin et al., 2024 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.