EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 685 (2026) E3S Web Conf., 685 (2026) 02007 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 685, 2026
International Seminar on Livable Space (IS-LiVaS 2025)
Article Number 02007
Number of page(s) 13
Section Appearance/Shape of Livable Space
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202668502007
Published online 14 January 2026
  1. N. Lachwani, T. Sudha Devi, Auditorium acoustics and architectural design. IJMR 5(3) (2023). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i03.3891 [Google Scholar]
  2. R. Fabbri, L. Shtrepi, S. Pone, E. Badino, X. Tellier, A. Ziegler, G. Nocerino, D. Lancia, M. Leone, Exploring acoustic performance integration at early stage of architectural design. In Proc. 10th Convention of the European Acoustics Association, Forum Acusticum, Torino, Italy, September 11-15 (2023). https://doi.org/10.61782/fa.2023.0307 [Google Scholar]
  3. N.R. Haddaway, M.J. Page, C.C. Pritchard, L.A. McGuinness, PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis. Campbell Syst. Rev. 18, e1230 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1230 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Kuusinen, T. Lokki, Wheel of concert hall acoustics. Acta Acust. United Acust. 103(2), 185–188 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3813/AAA.919046 [Google Scholar]
  5. T. Hidaka, L.L. Beranek, Objective and subjective evaluations of twenty-three opera houses in Europe, Japan, and the Americas. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107(1), 368–383 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1121/L428309 [Google Scholar]
  6. W. Zhao, J. Kang, H. Jin, Effects of geometry on the sound field in atria. Build. Simul. 10(1), 25–39 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-016-0317-0 [Google Scholar]
  7. E.M. Johnston-Iafelice, Impact of curved surfaces in performance spaces (2014) [Google Scholar]
  8. Y. Jurkiewicz, T. Wulfrank, E. Kahle, Architectural shape and early acoustic efficiency in concert halls (L). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 132(3), 1253–1256 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1121/L4740493 [Google Scholar]
  9. J.E. Summers, Auralization: Fundamentals of acoustics, modelling, simulation, algorithms, and acoustic virtual reality. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 123(6), 4028–4029 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1121/L2908264 [Google Scholar]
  10. H. Min, K. Xu, Coherent image source modeling of sound fields in long spaces with a sound-absorbing ceiling. Appl. Sci. (Switz.) 11(15) (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/app11156743 [Google Scholar]
  11. Z. Belanger, E. Teret, FDTD simulation study of acoustic enclosure shape (2021) [Google Scholar]
  12. L. Linsong, The influence of concert hall architecture on acoustics (the effect of musical performance). E3S Web Conf. 389, 06016 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202338906016 [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Galiana, C. Llinares, Â. Page, Analysis of the impact of architectural variables on acoustic perception in concert halls (2016). [Google Scholar]
  14. K.A. Hochgraf, The art of concert hall acoustics: Current trends and questions in research and design. Acoustics Today (2019). [Google Scholar]
  15. S.A. Ajiboye, Harmonizing spaces: Investigating the intersection of sound and architectural design. Stud. Art Archit. 3(3), 46–56 (2024). https://doi.org/10.56397/saa.2024.09.09 [Google Scholar]
  16. L.L. Beranek, The acoustical design of concert halls. Acoust. Soc. Am. (1994) [Google Scholar]
  17. W. Woszczyk, Active acoustics in concert halls - A new approach. Arch. Acoust. 36(2), 379–393 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2478/v10168-011-0028-6 [Google Scholar]
  18. A. Haapaniemi, Perceptual studies in concert hall acoustics. Aalto University (2018) [Google Scholar]
  19. Y.W. Lam, A comparison of three diffuse reflection modeling methods used in room acoustics computer models (1996). [Google Scholar]
  20. T. van Waterschoot, Deep, data-driven modeling of room acoustics: Literature review and research perspectives. arXiv:2504.16289 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Kumar, Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms on prediction of the sound absorption coefficient for reconfigurable acoustic meta-absorbers. Elsevier (2023). [Google Scholar]
  22. G. Goetz, Data-driven room acoustics modelling. Aalto University (2024) [Google Scholar]
  23. C.Y. Yeh, Y.S. Tsay, Using machine learning to predict indoor acoustic indicators of multi-functional activity centers. Appl. Sci. (Switz.) 11(12) (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125641 [Google Scholar]
  24. R. McCarthy, D. Cabrera, J. Bassett, Acoustics and sustainability: How should acoustics adapt to meet future demands? Directional assessment of acoustic stage support in a drama theatre (2008) [Google Scholar]
  25. S.S. Soha, E.G.M. Ebtehal, Improving the acoustic performance using sustainable materials: Case study lecture rooms (n.d.) [Google Scholar]
  26. J. Kang, Acoustics and sustainability: A built environment perspective. Int. J. Acoust. Vib. 25(3), 292 (2020). https://doi.org/10.20855/ijav.2020.25.3e97 [Google Scholar]
  27. A. Starowicz, M. Zielihski, Sustainable acoustics: The impact of AI on acoustics design and noise management. Tech. Sci. (2024). https://doi.org/10.31648/ts.10297 [Google Scholar]
  28. A.J. Aguilar Aguilara, BIM-based framework for indoor acoustic conditioning in early stages of design (2019) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.