EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 685 (2026) E3S Web Conf., 685 (2026) 03005 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 685, 2026
International Seminar on Livable Space (IS-LiVaS 2025)
Article Number 03005
Number of page(s) 12
Section Various Dimensions of Livable-Space
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202668503005
Published online 14 January 2026
  1. P. N. G. Akbar and J. Edelenbos, Social impacts of place-making in urban informal settlements: A case study of Indonesian kampungs, Social Sciences, 9(6), 104 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  2. M. M. Elgohary, A. R. Abdin, and H. A. E. Khalil, Upgrading informal areas through sustainable urban development principles, Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 71, 65 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  3. F. Baye, Exploring urban infrastructure challenges in informal peri-urban Owldia: barriers, implications, and informal strategies, Safe and Just Resource Management, 4 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  4. L. Ma, S. Lie, Y. Niu, and M. Chen, Village-scale livelihood change and the response of rural settlement land use: Sihe Village of Tongwei County in Mid-Gansu Loess Hilly Region as an example, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15, 18001 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  5. V. M. Netto, E. Brigati, and C. Chaholas, From form to information: Analysing built environments in different spatial cultures (preprint) (2020). [Google Scholar]
  6. C. Folke, Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses, Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 253–267 (2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. X. Tu and X. Zhang, Land use change, policy dynamics, and urban government: A case study of urban village redevelopment in Shenzhen, Urban Resilience and Sustainability, 1(3), 235–250 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Portelli, From the horizontal to the vertical, ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 19(2), 486–507 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Junker, The vertical versus horizontal city: Why vertical resettlement (mostly) does not work for the urban poor, 245–262 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Zieleniec, Lefebvre's politics of space: Planning the urban as oeuvre, Urban Planning, 3(3), 5–15 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  11. M. E. Leary-Owhin, Henri Lefebvre, planning's friend or implacable critic?, Urban Planning, 3(3), 1–4 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  12. A. A. Rocha, H. M. Araüjo, and A. E. Q. Ferraz, Production of space and sociospatial practices in urban spaces: Categories and concepts on the move, RGSA: Revista de Gestào Social e Ambiental, 18(12), 213 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  13. P. Jones, Housing resilience and the informal city, Journal of Regional and City Planning, 28(2), 129–144 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Torres Méndez et al., Resiliencia comunitaria y sentido de comunidad durante la respuesta y recuperaciön al terremoto-tsunami del ano 2010, Talcahuano-Chile, REDER, 2(1), 5–19 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  15. H. Hikichi et al., Residential relocation and change in social capital: A natural experiment from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami, Science Advances, 3(7) (2017). [Google Scholar]
  16. S. F. Chao, Social support, coping strategies, and their correlations with older adults' relocation adjustments after a natural disaster, Geriatrics & Gerontology International, 17(6), 1006–1014 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Seebauer and C. Winkler, Coping strategies and trajectories of life satisfaction among households in a voluntary planned program of relocation from a flood-risk area, Climatic Change, 162(4), 2229–2248 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  18. S. Runtunuwu, A. Sudikno, S. Surjono, and I. R. D. Ari, The conceptual framework of community resilience of the flat residents, International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.40), 427–432 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  19. W. N. Adger, Social and ecological resilience: Are they related?, Progress in Human Geography, 24(3), 347–364 (2000). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. C. S. Holling, Resilience and stability of ecological systems, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1–23 (1973). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. D. Vardanov, M. E. Kosov, S. Shoar, and A. Banaitis, Modeling social impacts of high-rise residential buildings during the post-occupancy phase using DEMATEL method: A case study, Buildings, 11(11), 504 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  22. S. Muhuri and S. Basu, Interactional spaces of a high-rise group housing complex and social cohesion of its residents: Case study from Kolkata, India, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 36(4), 1477–1503 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  23. A. S. Bee and I. P. Lim, The provision of vertical social pockets for better social interaction in high-rise living, Planning Malaysia Journal, 14(4), 156 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  24. A. Leaman and B. Bordass, Assessing building performance in use 4: The PROBE occupant surveys and their implications, Building Research & Information, 29(2), 129–143 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  25. M. Way and B. Bordass, Making feedback and post-occupancy evaluation routine 2: Soft Landings—Involving design and building teams in improving performance, Building Research & Information, 33(4), 353–360 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  26. J. Zhao, Y. Pan, P. Xu, and Y. Zhang, Post-occupancy studies of an office environment and energy performance, Building and Environment, 69, 24–35 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  27. P. Li, T. M. Froese, and G. Brager, Post-occupancy evaluation: State-of-the-art analysis and state-of-the-practice review, Building and Environment, 133, 187–202 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  28. B. Bordass, R. Cohen, M. Standeven, and A. Leaman, Assessing building performance in use 3 : Energy performance of the PROBE buildings, Building Research & Information, 29(2), 114–128 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  29. H. Zuo and C. H. Hansen, Scoping review of post-occupancy evaluation of office buildings with emphasis on occupant satisfaction and productivity, Journal of Building Engineering, 88, 109–129 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  30. A. Ashadi, R. D. Nur'aini, F. Lissimia, A. Anisa, and S. N. A. Wahab, Perubahan tata ruang dan fungsi Kampung Akuarium, Jakarta, Arsitektura, 2(1), 51 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  31. P. Puspitasari, A. Djunaedi, and H. S. A. Putra, Morphological changes and cultural persistence in a religious-historic urban kampung: Luar Batang, Jakarta, Indonesia, ISVS e-Journal, 2(2) (2012). [Google Scholar]
  32. M. Iqbal, N. Vonika, P. Kesejahteraan, and S. Bandung, Dinamika proses relokasi di DKI Jakarta: Studi kasus Kampung Akuarium di Penjaringan, Jakarta Utara, LINDAYASOS: Jurnal Ilmiah Perlindungan dan Pemberdayaan Sosial, 1(1), 32–52 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  33. M. Afiat, Resettlement Kampung Akuarium Jakarta Utara dengan metode kampung berlapis dan innovative self-sustaining living, in Seminar Ilmiah Arsitektur 2020, 566–574 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  34. H. Lefebvre, Critique of everyday life, Vol. I, Verso (1991). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.