Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 685, 2026
International Seminar on Livable Space (IS-LiVaS 2025)
Article Number 03007
Number of page(s) 8
Section Various Dimensions of Livable-Space
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202668503007
Published online 14 January 2026
  1. H. S. Hasibuan et al., The progression of transport infrastructures and transit-oriented development (TOD) areas in Jakarta and Kuala Lumpur suburban: Lessons from policy approach, Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(9), 6025 (2024). doi: 10.24294/jipd.v8i9.6025. [Google Scholar]
  2. R. Cervero and G. Arrington, Vehicle trip reduction impacts of transit-oriented housing, Journal of Public Transportation, 11(3), 1–17 (2008). doi: 10.5038/2375-0901.11.3.1. [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Iamtrakul and S. Chayphong, Challenges of sustainable mobility: Context of car dependency in suburban areas in Thailand, Geographica Pannonica, 27(2), 145–158 (2023). doi: 10.5937/gp27-42183. [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Â. Garcia-Löpez, A. Holl, and E. Viladecans-Marsal, Suburbanization and highways in Spain when the Romans and the Bourbons still shape its cities, Journal of Urban Economics, 85, 52–67 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2014.11.002. [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Moyano et al., Typologies of stations' catchment areas in metropolitan urban peripheries: From car-oriented to sustainable urban strategies, Land Use Policy, 134, 106903 (2023). doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106903. [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Moyano, J. M. Coronado, R. Ruiz, and V. Romero, Station avenue: High-speed rail's missing link. Assessing pedestrian city-station routes for edge stations in Spanish small cities, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 34(1), 175–193 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  7. R. Cervero and J. Murakami, Rail and property development in Hong Kong: Experiences and extensions, Urban Studies, 46(10), 2019–2043 (2009). doi: 10.1177/0042098009339431. [Google Scholar]
  8. D. W. Astuti, L. S. Barus, N. Achjar, and H. Martell-Flores, Travel behavior of commuter line passengers to station in Depok City, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 673(1) (2019). doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/673/1/012046. [Google Scholar]
  9. D. Lei et al., Inferring temporal motifs for travel pattern analysis using large-scale smart card data, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 120, 102810 (2020). doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2020.102810. [Google Scholar]
  10. X. Yang et al., Classifying and evaluating high-speed rail stations based on the node-place-connectivity model: A case study of the Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration in China, Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 151(1), 1–12 (2025). doi: 10.1061/JUPDDM.UPENG-5112. [Google Scholar]
  11. L. Yang and X. Song, TOD typology based on urban renewal: A classification of metro stations for Ningbo City, Urban Rail Transit, 7(3), 240–255 (2021). doi: 10.1007/s40864-021-00153-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Y. Yue et al., New classification scheme and evolution characteristics analysis of highspeed railway stations using large-scale mobile phone data: A case study in Jiangsu, China, Journal of Transportation Engineering Part A: Systems, 149(11), 1–12 (2023). doi: 10.1061/jtepbs.teeng-7855. [Google Scholar]
  13. L. Bertolini, Spatial development patterns and public transport: The application of an analytical model in the Netherlands, Planning Practice and Research, 14(2), 199–210 (1999). doi: 10.1080/02697459915724. [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Zhou et al., Introducing social contacts into the node-place model: A case study of Hong Kong, Journal of Transport Geography, 107, 103532 (2023). doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2023.103532. [Google Scholar]
  15. D. A. Rodriguez and C. D. Kang, A typology of the built environment around rail stops in the global transit-oriented city of Seoul, Korea, Cities, 100, 102663 (2020). doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102663. [Google Scholar]
  16. P. Calthorpe, The next American metropolis: Ecology, community, and the American dream, Princeton Architectural Press (1993). [Google Scholar]
  17. D. Pojani and D. Stead, Sustainable urban transport in the developing world: Beyond megacities, Sustainability, 7(6), 7784–7805 (2015). doi: 10.3390/su7067784. [Google Scholar]
  18. R. Cervero et al., Transit-oriented development in America: Experiences, challenges, and prospects, National Academy Press (2004). [Google Scholar]
  19. R. Thomas et al., Is transit-oriented development (TOD) an internationally transferable policy concept?, Regional Studies, 52, 1201–1213 (2018). doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1428740. [Google Scholar]
  20. R. Cervero, Built environments and mode choice: Toward a normative framework, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 7(4), 265–284 (2002). doi: 10.1016/S1361-9209(01)00024-4. [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Nasri and L. Zhang, Impact of metropolitan-level built environment on travel behavior, Transportation Research Record, 2323, 75–79 (2012). doi: 10.3141/2323-09. [Google Scholar]
  22. R. Ewing et al., Trip and parking generation at transit-oriented developments: Five US case studies, Landscape and Urban Planning, 160, 69–78 (2017). doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.12.002. [Google Scholar]
  23. R. D. Knowles, Transit-oriented development in Copenhagen, Denmark: From the Finger Plan to Orestad, Journal of Transport Geography, 22, 251–261 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.009. [Google Scholar]
  24. Y. J. Singh et al., Measuring TOD around transit nodes: Towards TOD policy, Transport Policy, 56, 96–111 (2017). doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.03.013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. C. T. Voulgaris et al., Synergistic neighborhood relationships with travel behavior: An analysis of travel in 30,000 US neighborhoods, Journal of Transport and Land Use, 10(1), 437–461 (2017). doi: 10.5198/jtlu.2016.840. [Google Scholar]
  26. W. Kong and D. Pojani, Transit-oriented street design in Beijing, Journal of Urban Design, 22(3), 388–410 (2017). doi: 10.1080/13574809.2016.1271700. [Google Scholar]
  27. P. K. Patnala, C. Ravi Sekhar, and M. Parida, Residential dissonance in TOD neighborhoods, Journal of Transport Geography, 72, 166–177 (2018). doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.09.005. [Google Scholar]
  28. S. Niu et al., Measuring the built environment of green transit-oriented development: A factor-cluster analysis of rail station areas in Singapore, Frontiers of Architectural Research, 10(3), 652–668 (2021). doi: 10.1016/jfoar.2021.03.005. [Google Scholar]
  29. M. Austin et al., Performance-based transit-oriented development typology guidebook, CTOD (2010). [Google Scholar]
  30. S. Zemp et al., Classifying railway stations for strategic transport and land use planning: Context matters, Journal of Transport Geography, 19(4), 670–679 (2011). doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.08.008. [Google Scholar]
  31. M. Kamruzzaman et al., Advance transit-oriented development typology: Case study in Brisbane, Australia, Journal of Transport Geography, 34, 54–70 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.11.002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. C. D. Higgins and P. S. Kanaroglou, A latent class method for classifying and evaluating the performance of station area transit-oriented development in the Toronto region, Journal of Transport Geography, 52, 61–72 (2016). doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.02.012. [Google Scholar]
  33. D. S. Vale, Transit-oriented development, integration of land use and transport, and pedestrian accessibility: Combining node-place model with pedestrian shed ratio to evaluate and classify station areas in Lisbon, Journal of Transport Geography, 45, 70–80 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.04.009. [Google Scholar]
  34. Y. Song and G. J. Knaap, Quantitative classification of neighbourhoods: The neighbourhoods of new single-family homes in the Portland metropolitan area, Journal of Urban Design, 12(1), 1–24 (2007). doi: 10.1080/13574800601072640. [Google Scholar]
  35. P. Kumar, C. Ravi Sekhar, and M. Parida, Identification of neighborhood typology for potential transit-oriented development, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 78, 102186 (2020). doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2019.11.015. [Google Scholar]
  36. R. Huang et al., Measuring transit-oriented development (TOD) network complementarity based on TOD node typology, Journal of Transport and Land Use, 11(1), 304–324 (2018). doi: 10.5198/jtlu.2018.1110. [Google Scholar]
  37. C. Atkinson-Palombo and M. J. Kuby, The geography of advance transit-oriented development in metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona, 2000-2007, Journal of Transport Geography, 19(2), 189–199 (2011). doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.03.014. [Google Scholar]
  38. G. Lyu, L. Bertolini, and K. Pfeffer, Developing a TOD typology for Beijing metro station areas, Journal of Transport Geography, 55, 40–50 (2016). doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.07.002. [Google Scholar]
  39. D. P. Yu et al., Transit-oriented development and floor area ratio regulation in a transportation corridor: Formulation and a case study, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 176, 103814 (2023). doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2023.103814. [Google Scholar]
  40. D. Jeffrey et al., Using walkability measures to identify train stations with the potential to become transit-oriented developments located in walkable neighbourhoods, Journal of Transport Geography, 76, 221–231 (2019). doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.03.009. [Google Scholar]
  41. T. Mitrovic, V. Stojakovic, and M. Vracaric, Simulation of pedestrian accessibility to assess the spatial distribution of urban amenities, Spatium, 47, 42–51 (2022). doi: 10.2298/SPAT210429002M. [Google Scholar]
  42. J. E. Honiball, E. A. Burger, and Y. Burger, Pedestrian connectivity: A focus on residential neighbourhood sidewalks to promote accessibility to public parks, Spatium, 51, 1–10 (2024). doi: 10.2298/SPAT240401007H. [Google Scholar]
  43. M. Kamruzzaman et al., Commuting mode choice in transit-oriented development: Disentangling the effects of competitive neighbourhoods, travel attitudes, and self-selection, Transport Policy, 42, 187–196 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.06.003. [Google Scholar]
  44. X. Li et al., Decision tree-based station-level rail transit ridership forecasting, Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 142(4), 1-9 (2016). doi: 10.1061/(asce)up.1943-5444.0000331. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.