EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 687 (2026) E3S Web Conf., 687 (2026) 01006 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 687, 2026
The 2nd International Conference on Applied Sciences and Smart Technologies (InCASST 2025)
Article Number 01006
Number of page(s) 12
Section Environmental Developments & Sustainable Systems
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202668701006
Published online 15 January 2026
  1. Singha C, Rana VK, Pham QB, Nguyen DC, Łupikasza E. Integrating machine learning and geospatial data analysis for comprehensive flood hazard assessment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2024;31:48497–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-34286-7. [Google Scholar]
  2. Oluwadare TS, Ribeiro MP, Chen D, Babadi Ataabadi M, Tabesh SH, Daomi AE. Applying Machine Learning Algorithms for Spatial Modeling of Flood Susceptibility Prediction over São Paulo Sub-Region. Land (Basel) 2025;14:985. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14050985. [Google Scholar]
  3. Dey H, Haque MM, Shao W, VanDyke M, Hao F. Simulating flood risk in Tampa Bay using a machine learning driven approach. Npj Natural Hazards 2024;1:40. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44304-024-00045-4. [Google Scholar]
  4. Seleem O, Ayzel G, de Souza ACT, Bronstert A, Heistermann M. Towards urban flood susceptibility mapping using data-driven models in Berlin, Germany. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk 2022;13:1640–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2022.2097131. [Google Scholar]
  5. Meng C, Jin H. A Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Predicting Flood Susceptibility Based on the Enhanced NHAND Method. Sustainability 2023;15:14928. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014928. [Google Scholar]
  6. Yuwono BD, Abidin HZ, Poerbandono, Andreas H, Pratama ASP, Gradiyanto F. Mapping of flood hazard induced by land subsidence in Semarang City, Indonesia, using hydraulic and spatial models. Natural Hazards 2024;120:5333–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06398-9. [Google Scholar]
  7. Cahyono C, Rusli L. Flood Mapping Potential Areas Using HEC-RAS Software (Case Study: Kota Lama of Semarang). IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 2024;1324:012100. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1324/1/012100. [Google Scholar]
  8. Setyani RE, Saputra R. Flood-prone Areas Mapping at Semarang City by Using Simple Additive Weighting Method. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2016;227:378–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.089. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lahsaini M, Albano F, Albano R, Mazzariello A, Lacava T. A Synthetic Aperture Radar-Based Robust Satellite Technique (RST) for Timely Mapping of Floods. Remote Sens (Basel) 2024;16:2193. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16122193. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hirt C, Filmer MS, Featherstone WE. Comparison and validation of the recent freely available ASTER-GDEM ver1, SRTM ver4.1 and GEODATA DEM-9S ver3 digital elevation models over Australia. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences 2010;57:337–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/08120091003677553. [Google Scholar]
  11. Mehran A, AghaKouchak A. Capabilities of satellite precipitation datasets to estimate heavy precipitation rates at different temporal accumulations. Hydrol Process 2014;28:2262–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9779. [Google Scholar]
  12. Tamiru Haile A, Worku Bekele T, Rientjes T. Interannual comparison of historical floods through flood detection using multi-temporal Sentinel-1 SAR images, Awash River Basin, Ethiopia. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 2023;124:103505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2023.103505. [Google Scholar]
  13. Wang B, Chen T. Gaussian process regression with multiple response variables. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2015;142:159–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2015.01.016. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kanagawa M, Hennig P, Sejdinovic D, Sriperumbudur BK. Gaussian Processes and Kernel Methods: A Review on Connections and Equivalences 2018. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gulian M, Frankel A, Swiler L. Gaussian process regression constrained by boundary value problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2022;388:114117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2021.114117. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.