Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 687, 2026
The 2nd International Conference on Applied Sciences and Smart Technologies (InCASST 2025)
Article Number 02010
Number of page(s) 11
Section Green Technologies & Digital Society
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202668702010
Published online 15 January 2026
  1. F. McKenna, AI Deepfakes Merged Scammers Faces On Stolen Identities. Available at: https://frankonfraud.com/ai-deepfakes-merged-scammers-faces-on-stolen-identities/ (2025). [Google Scholar]
  2. K. Azmi, S. Defit, S. Sumijan, Implementasi convolutional neural network (CNN) untuk klasifikasi batik tanah liat sumatera barat. J. Unitek. 16, 28–40 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  3. E. J. A. Sinaga, G. Oktavia, H. Syahputra, F. Ramadhani, Identifikasi Tanda Tangan Dengan Menggunakan Metode Convolution Neural Network (CNN). J-INTECH. 12, 138–147 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  4. I. N. G. A. Astawa, M. L. Radhitya, I. W. R. Ardana, F. A. Dwiyanto, Face Images Classification using VGG-CNN. Knowl. Eng. Data Sci. 4, 49–54 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Zamir, N. Ali, A. Naseem, A. Ahmed Frasteen, B. Zafar, M. Assam, E. A. Attia, Face detection & recognition from images & videos based on CNN & Raspberry Pi. Computation. 10, 148 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  6. R. Wang, et al., FakeSpotter: A Simple yet Robust Baseline for Spotting AI-Synthesized Fake Faces. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1909.06122 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  7. Y. Li, S. Lyu, Exposing DeepFake Videos By Detecting Face Warping Artifacts. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1811.00656 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  8. X. Zhang, S. Karaman, S.-F. Chang, Detecting and Simulating Artifacts in GAN Fake Images. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.06515 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  9. Y. Hamid, S. Elyassami, Y. Gulzar, V. R. Balasaraswathi, T. Habuza, S. Wani, An improvised CNN model for fake image detection. Int. J. Inf. Technol. 15, 5–15 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  10. M. S. M. Altaei, A detection of deep fake in face images using deep learning. Wasit J. Comput. Math. Sci. 1, 60–71 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  11. T. Karras, S. Laine, T. Aila, A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networks. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 43, 4217–4228 (2021). doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2020.2970919. [Google Scholar]
  12. H. Kaur, N. K. Sandhu, Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Proposed System Using F1 Score, Recall, Accuracy, Precision and Loss Metrics Compared to Prior Techniques. Int. J. Commun. Netw. Inf. Secur. 15, 368–383 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  13. M. M. Ahsan, M. R. Uddin, M. Farjana, A. N. Sakib, K. A. Momin, S. A. Luna, Image Data collection and implementation of deep learning-based model in detecting Monkeypox disease using modified VGG16. arXiv:2206.01862 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  14. C. Shorten, T. M. Khoshgoftaar, A survey on Image Data Augmentation for Deep Learning. J. Big Data. 6, 60 (2019). doi:10.1186/s40537-019-0197-0. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.