Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 688, 2026
The 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Environment, Development, and Energy (CONSER 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 07011 | |
| Number of page(s) | 8 | |
| Section | Sustainable Urban Development, Climate Adaptation, and Policy Integration | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202668807011 | |
| Published online | 20 January 2026 | |
- X. Wu, S. Wang, B. Fu, Y. Zhao, and Y. Wei, Pathways from payments for ecosystem services program to socioeconomic outcomes. Ecosyst. Serv. 39, 101005 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.101005 [Google Scholar]
- S. Luo, M. Naghibi, A. Patuano, and E. Van Leeuwen, Cultural ecosystem services of informal green spaces : usage , perception and preference of residents in deprived urban neighbourhoods. Local Environ. 1–21, (2025). 10.1080/13549839.2025.2533130. [Google Scholar]
- D. La Rosa, M. Spyra, and L. Inostroza, Indicators of Cultural Ecosystem Services for urban planning: A review. Ecol. Indic. 61, 74–89 (2016). 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.04.028. [Google Scholar]
- X. Cheng, S. Van Damme, L. Li, and P. Uyttenhove, "Evaluation of cultural ecosystem services: A review of methods. Ecosyst. Serv. 37, 100925 (2019). 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100925. [Google Scholar]
- C. Zhao, Q. Weng, and Z. He, Spatiotemporal analysis of underlying factors in urban transformations: Quantifying the importance of urban plan intentions in the Austin Metropolitan Area, Texas. Land use policy, 149, 107415 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.landusepol.2024.107415 [Google Scholar]
- J. B. Marre and R. Billé, A demand-driven approach to ecosystem services economic valuation: Lessons from Pacific island countries and territories, Ecosyst. Serv. 39, 100975 (2019). 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100975. [Google Scholar]
- T. Xia, S. Li, Y. Ma, and Y. Choi, Is China's Urban Development Planning Sustainable? Evidence from the Transportation Sector in Cities Along the Belt and Road Initiative Route. Land. 14(2) (2025). 10.3390/land14020363 [Google Scholar]
- I. Havinga, P. W. Bogaart, L. Hein, and D. Tuia, Defining and spatially modelling cultural ecosystem services using crowdsourced data. Ecosyst. Serv. 43, 101091 (2020). 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101091 [Google Scholar]
- R. Fish, A. Church, and M. Winter, Conceptualising cultural ecosystem services: A novel framework for research and critical engagement. Ecosyst. Serv. 21, 208–217 (2016). 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.002 [Google Scholar]
- J. Langemeyer, F. Calcagni, and F. Bare, Mapping the intangible: Using geolocated social media data to examine landscape aesthetics. Land use policy. 77(2017), 542–552 (2018). 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.049 [Google Scholar]
- S. K. Mallick, "Prediction-Adaptation-Resilience (PAR) approach- A new pathway towards future resilience and sustainable development of urban landscape. Geogr. Sustain. 2(2), 127–133 (2021). 10.1016/j.geosus.2021.06.002 [Google Scholar]
- D. Cabana, F. Ryfield, T. P. Crowe, and J. Brannigan, Evaluating and communicating cultural ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 42, (2020). 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101085 [Google Scholar]
- Z. Zhang et al., Spatially discontinuous relationships between salt marsh invasion and mangrove forest fragmentation. For. Ecol. Manage. 499, (2021). 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119611. [Google Scholar]
- N. Xu, Ecological Functional Zoning in Urban Fringe Areas Based on the Trade-Offs Between Ecological - Social Values in Ecosystem Services : A Case Study of Jiangning District, Nanjing. Land. 13(11), 1957 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/land13111957 [Google Scholar]
- A. Kosanic and J. Petzold, A systematic review of cultural ecosystem services and human wellbeing, Ecosyst. Serv. 45, 101168 (2020). 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101168 [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.