EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 691 (2026) E3S Web Conf., 691 (2026) 02006 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 691, 2026
The 10th International Conference on Biomass and Bioenergy: Sustainable Solution for A Greener Future: Harnessing Biomass and Bioenergy (ICBB 2025)
Article Number 02006
Number of page(s) 9
Section Bio-chemicals and Bio-materials; Bio-energy; AI/IT Technologies in Biomass/Bioenergy/Agriculture
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202669102006
Published online 22 January 2026
  1. S. Ullah, Z. Akhter, A. Palevicius, and G. Janusas, “Review: Natural fiber-based biocomposites for potential advanced automotive applications,” J. Eng. Fibers Fabr., vol. 20, p. 15589250241311468, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.1177/15589250241311468. [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Nigrawal, A. Kumar Sharma, and F. Zia Haque, “Sisal Fibre Based Polymeric Composites,” in Fiber-Reinforced Plastics, M. Alberto Masuelli, Ed., IntechOpen, 2022. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.101107. [Google Scholar]
  3. L. Gardyński, J. Caban, and D. Barta, “Research Of Composite Materials Used In The Construction Of Vehicle Bodywork,” Adv. Sci. Technol. Res. J., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 181–187, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.12913/22998624/92096. [Google Scholar]
  4. B. F. Yousif, A. Shalwan, C. W. Chin, and K. C. Ming, “Flexural properties of treated and untreated kenaf/epoxy composites,” Mater. Des., vol. 40, pp. 378–385, Sep. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.04.017. [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Choudhary, M. Kumar Sain, V. Kumar, P. Saraswat, and M. Kumar Jindal, “Advantages and applications of sisal fiber reinforced hybrid polymer composites in automobiles: A literature review,” Mater. Today Proc., p. S2214785323005904, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.02.072. [Google Scholar]
  6. R. Widyorini, P. A. Nugraha, M. Z. A. Rahman, and T. A. Prayitno, “Bonding Ability of a New Adhesive Composed of Citric Acid-Sucrose for Particleboard,” BioResources, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 4526–4535, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.15376/biores.11.2.4526-4535. [Google Scholar]
  7. Z. Huaxu et al., “Physico-Mechanical and Biological Durability of Citric Acid-Bonded Rubberwood Particleboard,” Polymers, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 98, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.3390/polym13010098. [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Shan et al., “Citric acid/sucrose-modified pMDI for constructing high-performance straw particleboard based on multiple cross-linked networks,” Ind. Crops Prod., vol. 222, p. 119842, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.119842. [Google Scholar]
  9. K. W. Prasetiyo et al., “Hybrid Adhesive Made from Citric Acid and Sucrose for Particleboard Composed of Sengon (Paraserianthes falcataria (L.) Nielsen) Veener By-Products and Sorghum Stalk,” J. Bahan Alam Terbarukan, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 68–76, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.15294/jbat.v11i2.38471. [Google Scholar]
  10. K. Umemura, O. Sugihara, and S. Kawai, “Investigation of a new natural adhesive composed of citric acid and sucrose for particleboard,” J. Wood Sci., vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 203–208, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.1007/s10086-013-1326-6. [Google Scholar]
  11. L. Astari, Sudarmanto, and F. Akbar, “Characteristics of Particleboards Made from Agricultural Wastes,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 359, no. 1, p. 012014, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/359/1/012014. [Google Scholar]
  12. B. Istana, I. M. L. Batan, Sutikno, S. Khem, U. Ubaidillah, and I. Yahya, “Influence of Particle Size and Bulk Density on Sound Absorption Performance of Oil Palm Frond-Reinforced Composites Particleboard,” Polymers, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 510, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.3390/polym15030510. [Google Scholar]
  13. E. Septiani, Y. Indrayani, and D. Setyawati, “Sifat Fisik Dan Mekanik Papan Partikel Dari Campuran Serbuk Gergaji Dan Ampas Tebu (Baggase) Pada Berbagai Konsentrasi Perekat Urea Formaldehida,” J. Lingkung. Hutan Trop., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 1053–1063, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  14. N. Herlina Sari et al., “Exploring the impact of water soaking on the mechanical, thermal, and physical properties of Paederia foetida fiber stem biocomposites: A study in sustainable material innovation,” Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng., vol. 10, p. 100977, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.cscee.2024.100977. [Google Scholar]
  15. T. Setyayunita, H. Suryanto, A. Aminnudin, A. F. Osman, and U. Yanuhar, “Characteristics of sisal-epoxy composite boards with sodium chloride-treated fibers at different treatment temperatures,” Teknomekanik, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 38–51, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.24036/teknomekanik.v8i1.35572. [Google Scholar]
  16. Subyakto, Z. Zhao, K. Umemura, and S. Kawai, “Development of Particle Board from Oil Palm Frond Fibers Using Citric Acid and Sucrose as Adhesives,” in The International Conference on the Innovation in Polymer Science and Technology 2013 (IPST2013), Yogyakarta: Himpunan Polimer Indonesia, Oct. 2013. [Online]. Available: https://hpi-polimer.org/images/proceeding_IPST2013/pp.176-183_OS505.pdf [Google Scholar]
  17. H. Nurdin, W. Waskito, and B. M. Siregar, “Characteristics Particleboard Made From Areca Fiber With Tapioca and Gambier Adhesive,” Teknomekanik, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 22–29, May 2021, doi: 10.24036/teknomekanik.v4i1.9372. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.