Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 692, 2026
3rd International Conference on Intelligent and Sustainable Power and Energy Systems (ISPES 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 03002 | |
| Number of page(s) | 15 | |
| Section | Artificial Intelligence and Human-Computer Interaction | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202669203002 | |
| Published online | 04 February 2026 | |
- Upreti, R., & Sondhiya, S., Smart Solutions for Sustainable Agriculture: Design and Development of IoT-Powered Soil Health Identification Systems. Communications on Applied Linear Analysis , 31, pp. 510–519, (2024). [Google Scholar]
- Kumar, S. R., Wahler, D., Leon-Salas, D., Bredneisen, J., Foster, E., Johnston, T., Schultze, R., Filley, M., Rahim, V., Martin, J., Villalta, L. A., Bolivar, P., Mauricio, A., & Gallagher, A., Self-powered, real-time LoRaWAN IoT-Based Soil Health Monitoring System. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8, pp. 9278–9293, (2021). [Google Scholar]
- G. Mohyuddin, M. A. Khan, A. Haseeb, S. Mahpara, M. Waseem and A. M. Saleh, “Evaluation of Machine Learning Approaches for Precision Farming in Smart Agriculture System: A Comprehensive Review,” in IEEE Access, 12, pp. 60155-60184, (2024). doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3390581 [Google Scholar]
- Tiyasa Mishra, Kenneth Chilton, Artificial Intelligence and Economic Sectors in Recent Times: Benefits and Limitations, Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture and Environmental Sustainability, (2025). DOI: Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83662-570-420251006. [Google Scholar]
- Aydin, Z., Turin, D., Iskeda, J., Gebrail, S., Sinan, N., Nigdeli, G., & Song, G., Use of Machine Learning Techniques in Soil Classification. Sustainability, 15, 2345, (2023). [Google Scholar]
- Ghorbani, M. A., Shamshirband, S., Haghi, D. Z., Azani, A., Bonakdari, H., & Ebtehaj, I., Hybrid MLP-FFA Model for Spatial Modeling of Soil Electrical Conductivity. Geoderma, 337, pp. 1079–1091 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- Patrizi, N., Ciani, L., & Castellini, P., Deep Learning (LSTM) Based Virtual Soil Moisture Sensor. Sensors, 22, 3789, (2022). [Google Scholar]
- Bwambale, E., Abagale, K., & Geophys, A., Data-Driven Model Predictive Control for Precision Irrigation Management. Smart Agricultural Technology, 3, 100123, (2022). [Google Scholar]
- Selvanarayanan, S., Rajendran, S., & Algburi, S., Empowering Coffee Farming Using Counterfactual Recommendation-Based RNN-Driven IoT Integrated Soil Quality Command System. Scientific Reports, 14, 1234–1245, (2024). [Google Scholar]
- Hugo Storm, Kathy Baylis, Thomas Heckelei, Machine learning in agricultural and applied economics, European Review of Agricultural Economics, 47, 3, pp. 849–892, July (2020). https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbz033 [Google Scholar]
- Tiwari, P., Tiwari, H., Ambareesh, S., & Sharma, A. (2025). Prediction of Traveling Ka Band Wave Tube Amplifier Characteristics Using FNN. In 2025 International Con-ference on Knowledge Engineering and Communication Systems (ICKECS), pp. 1–6, (2025). IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ICKECS65700.2025.1103. [Google Scholar]
- R. Priya and D. Ramesh, ML based sustainable precision agriculture: A future generation perspective, Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems, 28, p. 100439,(2020). doi: 10.1016/j.suscom.2020.100439. [Google Scholar]
- Hossam S. El-Beltagi, Mohamed Gad, Nagwa Khedr, Mohamed Abdel-Haleem, Mohamed S. Al Saikhan, Tarek A. Shalaby, Mohamed M. El-Mogy, Emad H. Khedr, Harnessing artificial intelligence and machine learning for fruit quality management: A comprehensive review, Journal of Stored Products Research, 116, 102920, (2026). 10.1016/j.jspr.2025.102920 [Google Scholar]
- Wongchai, A., Jeno, J. G., & Raizada, M. N., Ensemble Deep Learning Architecture for Sustainable Agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 193, 10669, (2022). [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.