Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 692, 2026
3rd International Conference on Intelligent and Sustainable Power and Energy Systems (ISPES 2025)
Article Number 06002
Number of page(s) 7
Section Sustainable Development
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202669206002
Published online 04 February 2026
  1. Global Energy Review 2025. [Online]. Available: www.iea.org [Google Scholar]
  2. W. Cao, X. Xuan, Y. Wang, Q. Wu, W. Cui, and W. Wu, A dynamic method for determining the optimal insulation thickness of external walls based on building operation schedules, Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 75, pp. 107049, Nov. (2025). doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2025.107049. [Google Scholar]
  3. E. Cuce, P. M. Cuce, C. J. Wood, and S. B. Riffat, Optimizing insulation thickness and analysing environmental impacts of aerogel-based thermal superinsulation in buildings, Energy Build, 77, pp. 28–39, (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.03.034. [Google Scholar]
  4. F. Ye, H. Wei, Y. Xiao, U. Berardi, G. Quaranta, and C. Demartino, Bio-based insulation materials in sustainable constructions: A review of environmental, thermal and acoustic insulation, durability, and mechanical performances, Elsevier Ltd, Nov. 01, (2025). doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2025.115872. [Google Scholar]
  5. A. F. Al-Shawabkeh, I. I. Ikhries, and N. A. Al-Najdawi, Assessing thermal insulation performance of recycled thermoplastic composites in sustainable buildings, Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, 62, Jun. (2025). doi: 10.1016/j.tsep.2025.10360 [Google Scholar]
  6. E. Açıkkalp and S. Y. Kandemir, A method for determining optimum insulation thickness: Combined economic and environmental method,” Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, 11, pp. 249–253, (2019). doi: 10.1016/j.tsep.2019.04.004. [Google Scholar]
  7. C. A. Balaras, A. G. Gaglia, E. Georgopoulou, S. Mirasgedis, Y. Sarafidis, and D. P. Lalas, European residential buildings and empirical assessment of the Hellenic building stock, energy consumption, emissions and potential energy savings, Build Environ, 42, no. 3, pp. 1298–1314, Mar. (2007). doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.11.001. [Google Scholar]
  8. K. Çomakli and B. Yüksel, Optimum insulation thickness of external walls for energy saving, Appl Therm Eng, 23, no. 4, pp. 473–479, Mar. (2003). doi: 10.1016/S1359-4311(02)00209-0. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ö. A. Dombayci, M. Gölcü, and Y. Pancar, Optimization of insulation thickness for external walls using different energy-sources, Appl Energy, 83, no. 9, pp. 921–928, (2006). doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2005.10.006. [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Kenisarin and K. Kenisarina, Energy saving potential in the residential sector of Uzbekistan, Energy, 32, no. 8, pp. 1319–1325, (2007). doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2006.09.014. [Google Scholar]
  11. K. Çomakli and B. Yüksel, Environmental impact of thermal insulation thickness in buildings, Appl Therm Eng, 24, no. 5–6, pp. 933–940, (2004). doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2003.10.020. [Google Scholar]
  12. The Central Bank’s key rate was left unchanged at 14 percent per annum. Press conference September 11, (2025). [Google Scholar]
  13. V. Kumar, M. Lo Ricco, R. D. Bergman, P. Nepal, and N. C. Poudyal, “Environmental impact assessment of mass timber, structural steel, and reinforced concrete buildings based on the 2021 international building code provisions,” Build Environ, 251, Mar. (2024). doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111195. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.