EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 693 (2026) E3S Web Conf., 693 (2026) 02001 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 693, 2026
International Process Metallurgy Conference (IPMC 2025)
Article Number 02001
Number of page(s) 8
Section Hydrometallurgy and Biohydrometallurgy
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202669302001
Published online 09 February 2026
  1. Vera, M., Schippers, A., Hedrich, S., & Sand, W. (2022). Progress in bioleaching: fundamentals and mechanisms of microbial metal sulfide oxidation-part A. Applied microbiology and biotechnology. 106(21), 6933–6952. [Google Scholar]
  2. Mohan, C., Robinson, J., Vodwal, L., & Kumari, N. (2024). Sustainable Development Goals for addressing environmental challenges. In Green chemistry approaches to environmental sustainability (pp. 357–374). Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
  3. Phogat, P., Kumar, V., & Singh, R. (2025). A scientometrics study of advancing sustainable metal recovery from e-waste: Trends, technologies, and sustainability assessment. Sustainable Energy & Fuels. 9(6), 1412–1431. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5SU00049A [Google Scholar]
  4. Smerigan, A., & Shi, R. (2025). Toward Sustainable Rare Earth Element Production: Key Challenges in Techno-Economic, Life Cycle, and Social Impact Assessment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.22569. [Google Scholar]
  5. Sajjad, W., Zheng, G., Din, G., Ma, X., Rafiq, M., & Xu, W. (2019). Metals extraction from sulfide ores with microorganisms: the bioleaching technology and recent developments. Transactions of the Indian institute of metals. 72(3), 559–579. [Google Scholar]
  6. Malik, L., & Hedrich, S. (2022). Ferric iron reduction in extreme acidophiles. Frontiers in microbiology. 12, 818414. [Google Scholar]
  7. Becci, A., Amato, A., Fonti, V., Karaj, D., & Beolchini, F. (2020). An innovative biotechnology for metal recovery from printed circuit boards. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 153, 104549. [Google Scholar]
  8. Mostafavi, M., Mirazimi, S.M.J., Rashchi, F., Faraji, F., & Mostoufi, N. (2018). Bioleaching and kinetic investigation of WPCBs by A. ferrooxidans, A. thiooxidans and their mixtures. Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering. 52(1), 81–91. [Google Scholar]
  9. Keshavarz, S., Faraji, F., Rashchi, F., & Mokmeli, M. (2021). Bioleaching of manganese from a low-grade pyrolusite ore using Aspergillus niger: Process optimization and kinetic studies. Journal of Environmental Management. 285, 112153. [Google Scholar]
  10. Pal, A., Bhattacharjee, S., Saha, J., Sarkar, M., & Mandal, P. (2022). Bacterial survival strategies and responses under heavy metal stress: a comprehensive overview. Critical reviews in microbiology. 48(3), 327–355. [Google Scholar]
  11. Watling, H.R. (2006). The bioleaching of sulphide minerals with emphasis on copper sulphides—a review. Hydrometallurgy. 84(1-2), 81–108. [Google Scholar]
  12. Sarkodie, E.K., Jiang, L., Li, K., Yang, J., Guo, Z., Shi, J., & Liu, X. (2022). A review on the bioleaching of toxic metal (loid) s from contaminated soil: Insight into the mechanism of action and the role of influencing factors. Frontiers in microbiology. 13, 1049277. [Google Scholar]
  13. Pourhossein, F., Rezaei, O., Mousavi, S.M., & Beolchini, F. (2021). Bioleaching of critical metals from waste OLED touch screens using adapted acidophilic bacteria. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering. 19(1), 893–906. [Google Scholar]
  14. Garcia-Ochoa, F., & Gomez, E. (2009). Bioreactor scale-up and oxygen transfer rate in microbial processes: an overview. Biotechnology advances. 27(2), 153–176. [Google Scholar]
  15. Adetunji, A.I., Oberholster, P.J., & Erasmus, M. (2023). Bioleaching of metals from e-waste using microorganisms: a review. Minerals. 13(6), 828. [Google Scholar]
  16. Tembhare, S.P., Bhanvase, B.A., Barai, D.P., & Dhoble, S.J. (2022). E-waste recycling practices: a review on environmental concerns, remediation and technological developments with a focus on printed circuit boards. Environment, development and sustainability. 24(7), 8965–9047. [Google Scholar]
  17. Biswal, B.K., Zhang, B., Tran, P.T.M., Zhang, J., & Balasubramanian, R. (2024). Recycling of spent lithium-ion batteries for a sustainable future: recent advancements. Chemical Society Reviews. 53(11), 5552–5592. [Google Scholar]
  18. Ngoma, E.I. (2025). Optimization of pilot bioleaching for enhanced metal recovery: scale-up bioreactor, comparative bio-oxidation analysis, and advancing the continuous pyrrhotite bioleaching process (Doctoral dissertation, Laurentian University Library & Archives). [Google Scholar]
  19. Binnemans, K., & Jones, P.T. (2023). The twelve principles of circular hydrometallurgy. Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy. 9(1), 1–25. [Google Scholar]
  20. Fan, K., Wang, W., Xu, X., Yuan, Y., Ren, N., Lee, D.J., & Chen, C. (2023). Recent advances in biotechnologies for the treatment of environmental pollutants based on reactive Sulfur species. Antioxidants. 12(3), 767. [Google Scholar]
  21. Sahoo, P.C., Pant, D., Kumar, M., Gupta, R.P., & Srivastava, U. (2024). Unraveling the potential of solar-bioelectrochemical CO2 conversion for third generation biorefineries. Current Opinion in Electrochemistry. 45, 101513. [Google Scholar]
  22. Masaki, Y., Hirajima, T., Sasaki, K., Miki, H., & Okibe, N. (2018). Microbiological redox potential control to improve the efficiency of chalcopyrite bioleaching. Geomicrobiology Journal. 35(8), 648–656. [Google Scholar]
  23. Wu, B., Wen, J.K., Chen, B.W., Yao, G.C., & Wang, D.Z. (2014). Control of redox potential by oxygen limitation in selective bioleaching of chalcocite and pyrite. Rare Metals. 33(5), 622–627. [Google Scholar]
  24. Hong, M., Huang, X., Gan, X., Qiu, G., & Wang, J. (2021). The use of pyrite to control redox potential to enhance chalcopyrite bioleaching in the presence of Leptospirillum ferriphilum. Minerals Engineering, 172, 107145. [Google Scholar]
  25. Third, K.A., Cord‐Ruwisch, R., & Watling, H.R. (2002). Control of the redox potential by oxygen limitation improves bacterial leaching of chalcopyrite. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 78(4), 433–441. [Google Scholar]
  26. Christel, S., Herold, M., Bellenberg, S., Buetti-Dinh, A., El Hajjami, M., Pivkin, I.V., & Dopson, M. (2018). Weak iron oxidation by Sulfobacillus thermosulfidooxidans maintains a favorable redox potential for chalcopyrite bioleaching. Frontiers in microbiology. 9, 3059. [Google Scholar]
  27. Garg, H., Nagar, N., Ansari, M.N., Ellamparuthy, G., Angadi, S.I., Akcil, A., & Gahan, C.S. (2020). Bioleaching of waste mobile phone printed circuit board in controlled redox potential compared to non-controlled redox potential. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 17(6), 3165–3176. [Google Scholar]
  28. Li, Y., Tian, Z., Wang, X., Wen, J., Mao, Q., & Yang, C. (2025). Enhanced chalcopyrite bioleaching with mechanical activation and redox potential regulation. Minerals Engineering. 227, 109292. [Google Scholar]
  29. Yahya, A., & Johnson, D.B. (2002). Bioleaching of pyrite at low pH and low redox potentials by novel mesophilic Gram-positive bacteria. Hydrometallurgy. 63(2), 181–188. [Google Scholar]
  30. Lotfalian, M., Ranjbar, M., Fazaelipoor, M.H., Schaffie, M., & Manafi, Z. (2015). The effect of redox control on the continuous bioleaching of chalcopyrite concentrate. Minerals Engineering. 81, 52–57. [Google Scholar]
  31. Gericke, M., Govender, Y., & Pinches, A. (2010). Tank bioleaching of low-grade chalcopyrite concentrates using redox control. Hydrometallurgy. 104(3-4), 414–419. [Google Scholar]
  32. Baez, A.G., Moradkhani, H., & Wen, Z. (2024). Molding the future: Optimization of bioleaching of rare earth elements from electronic waste by Penicillium expansum and insights into its mechanism. Bioresource Technology. 402. [Google Scholar]
  33. Ferreira, A.D., Zem, T.M.S., Barcellos, D., Nóbrega, G.N., Queiroz, H.M., Otero, X.L., … & Ferreira, T.O. (2024). Assessment of the potential of microbial consortium for the reclamation of mine tailings containing potentially toxic elements. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 12(2), 112399. [Google Scholar]
  34. Akoijam, N., & Joshi, S.R. (2024). Genome Editing and Genetically Engineered Bacteria for Bioremediation of Heavy Metals. In Genome Editing in Bacteria (Part 2) (pp. 184–221). Bentham Science Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  35. Brenner, K., You, L., and Arnold, F.H. (2008). Engineering microbial consortia: a new frontier in synthetic biology. Trends Biotechnol. 26, 483–489. [Google Scholar]
  36. Momeni, B., Chen, C.-C., Hillesland, K.L., Waite, A., and Shou, W. (2011). Using artificial systems to explore the ecology and evolution of symbioses. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 68, 1353–1368. [Google Scholar]
  37. Olson, G.J., Brierley, J.A., and Brierley, C.L. (2003). Bioleaching review part B: progress in bioleaching: applications of microbial processes by the minerals industries. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 63, 249–257. [Google Scholar]
  38. Haferburg, G., and Kothe, E. (2010). Metallomics: lessons for metalliferous soil remediation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 87, 1271–1280. [Google Scholar]
  39. Kusano, T., Sugawara, K., Inoue, C., Takeshima, T., Numata, M., and Shiratori, T. (1992). Electrotransformation of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans with plasmids containing a mer determinant. J. Bacteriol. 174, 6617–6623. [Google Scholar]
  40. Chen, D., Lin, J., Che, Y., Liu, X., and Lin, J. (2011). Construction of recombinant mercury resistant Acidithiobacillus caldus. Microbiol. Res. 166, 515–520. [Google Scholar]
  41. Rawlings, D.E., and Johnson, D.B. (2007). The microbiology of biomining: development and optimization of mineral-oxidizing microbial consortia. Microbiology. 153, 315–324. [Google Scholar]
  42. Moyo, T., Chirume, B.H., & Petersen, J. (2020). Assessing alternative pre-treatment methods to promote metal recovery in the leaching of printed circuit boards. Resources, conservation and recycling. 152, 104545. [Google Scholar]
  43. Pourhossein, F., Mousavi, S.M., Beolchini, F., & Martire, M.L. (2021). Novel green hybrid acidic-cyanide bioleaching applied for high recovery of precious and critical metals from spent light emitting diode lamps. Journal of Cleaner Production. 298, 126714. [Google Scholar]
  44. Brar, K.K., Magdouli, S., Perreault, N.N., Tanabene, R., & Brar, S.K. (2024). Reviving Riches: Unleashing Critical Minerals from Copper Smelter Slag Through Hybrid Bioleaching Approach. Minerals, 14(11), 1094. [Google Scholar]
  45. Trivedi, A., & Hait, S. (2025). Semi-scale stirred tank enzymatic bioleaching system for metal recovery from PCBs of end-of-life mobile phones: Process parameter optimization, predictive modelling, and economic assessment. Waste Management. 204, 114916. [Google Scholar]
  46. Priya, A., & Hait, S. (2018). Extraction of metals from high grade waste printed circuit board by conventional and hybrid bioleaching using Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Hydrometallurgy. 177, 132–139. [Google Scholar]
  47. Liu, R., Mao, Z., Liu, W., Wang, Y., Cheng, H., Zhou, H., & Zhao, K. (2020). Selective removal of cobalt and copper from Fe (III)-enriched high-pressure acid leach residue using the hybrid bioleaching technique. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 384, 121462. [Google Scholar]
  48. Chandane, P., Jori, C., Chaudhari, H., Bhapkar, S., Deshmukh, S., & Jadhav, U. (2020). Bioleaching of copper from large printed circuit boards for synthesis of organic-inorganic hybrid. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 27(6), 5797–5808. [Google Scholar]
  49. Levenspiel, O. (1998). Chemical reaction engineering. John wiley & sons. [Google Scholar]
  50. Chen, S., Yang, Y., Liu, C., Dong, F., & Liu, B. (2015). Column bioleaching copper and its kinetics of waste printed circuit boards (WPCBs) by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Chemosphere. 141, 162–168. [Google Scholar]
  51. Nagar, N., Garg, H., & Gahan, C.S. (2019). Integrated bio-pyro-hydro-metallurgical approach to recover metal values from petroleum refinery spent catalyst. Biocatalysis and agricultural biotechnology. 20, 101252. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.