Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 694, 2026
Third International Conference on Green Energy, Environmental Engineering and Sustainable Technologies 2025 (ICGEST 2025)
Article Number 01003
Number of page(s) 9
Section Application of Sustainable Technology in Construction Industry
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202669401003
Published online 16 February 2026
  1. Van Chanh, N., Trung, B.D., & Van Tuan, D. (2008). Recent research geopolymer concrete. In The 3rd ACF international conference-ACF/VCA, Vietnam (Vol. 18, pp. 235–241). [Google Scholar]
  2. Geweda, A.E., Zayed, M.E., Khan, M.Y., & Alquaity, A.B. (2025). Mitigating CO2 emissions: A review on emerging technologies/strategies for CO2 capture. Journal of the Energy Institute, 118, 101911. [Google Scholar]
  3. Veranita, V., Zulyaden, Z., Supardi, J., & Balqis, M. (2025). Study of the Compressive Strength of Geopolymer Concrete Using Rice Husk Ash and Seashells in Rigid Pavements. Construction Technologies and Architecture, 18, 33–40. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hamada, H.M., Al-Attar, A., Beddu, S., Askar, M.K., Yousif, S.T., & Majdi, A. (2025). Impact of rice husk ash on geopolymer concrete: A literature review and future directions. Case Studies in Construction Materials, e04476. [Google Scholar]
  5. Sujitha, V.S., Raja, S., Rusho, M.A., & Yishak, S. (2025). Advances and Developments in High Strength Geopolymer Concrete for Sustainable Construction-A Review. Case Studies in Construction Materials, e04669. [Google Scholar]
  6. Mahdi, S.N., Ohno, M., Thomas, B.S., Nagaratnam, B., & Nawaukkaratharnant, N. (2025). Investigating the Durability Characteristics of Brick Fired Rice Husk Ash as Sustainable Material for Fly Ash based Geopolymer Concrete. Engineered Science. [Google Scholar]
  7. Arivalagan, S. (2014). Sustainable studies on concrete with GGBS as a replacement material in cement. Jordan journal of civil Engineering, 8(3), 263–270. [Google Scholar]
  8. Saranya, P., Nagarajan, P., & Shashikala, A.P. (2018, March). Eco-friendly GGBS concrete: a state-of-the-art review. In IOP conference series: materials science and engineering (Vol. 330, No. 1, p. 012057). IOP Publishing. DOI 10.1088/1757-899X/330/1/012057 [Google Scholar]
  9. Ahmad, J., Kontoleon, K.J., Majdi, A., Naqash, M.T., Deifalla, A.F., Ben Kahla, N., … & Qaidi, S.M. (2022). A comprehensive review on the ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) in concrete production. Sustainability, 14(14), 8783. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148783 [Google Scholar]
  10. Paruthi, S., Rahman, I., Khan, A.H., Sharma, N., & Alyaseen, A. (2024). Strength, durability, and economic analysis of GGBS-based geopolymer concrete with silica fume under harsh conditions. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 31572. [Google Scholar]
  11. Nakum, Abhay, V., and N.K. Arora. “The impact of alkaline solution to fly ash ratio with different molarities of sodium hydroxide on self-compacted geopolymer concrete.” Materials Today: Proceedings 62 (2022): 4168–4176. [Google Scholar]
  12. Fareed Ahmed Memon, Muhd Fadhil Nuruddin, Samuel Demie and Nasir Shafiq, “Effect of Curing Conditions on Strength of Fly ash-based Self-Compacting Geopolymer Concrete”, International Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Vol:5, No:8,(2011) [Google Scholar]
  13. IS15658:2021, Precast Concrete blocks for paving, Specifications - BIS2021 [Google Scholar]
  14. Yilmazoglu, A., Yildirim, S.T., Yıldız, S., & Behçet, Ö.F. (2024). Effect of GGBS content and water/geopolymer solid ratio on the mechanical, elevated temperature resistance, and sorptivity properties of FA/GGBS-based geopolymer concrete. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 36(4), 04024032. [Google Scholar]
  15. Oner, A.D.N.A.N., & Akyuz, S. (2007). An experimental study on optimum usage of GGBS for the compressive strength of concrete. Cement and concrete composites, 29(6), 505–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2007.01.001 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.