Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 695, 2026
2nd International Conference on Sustainable Chemistry (ICSChem 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 05004 | |
| Number of page(s) | 7 | |
| Section | Education | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202669505004 | |
| Published online | 24 February 2026 | |
- P. A. Facione, Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts, Insight Assessment. https://www.law.uh.edu/blakely/advocacy-survey/Critical%20Thinking%20Skills.pdf [Google Scholar]
- I. Caleon and R. Subramaniam, “Development and Application of a Three-Tier Diagnostic Test to Assess Secondary Students’ Understanding of Waves,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., 32(7), 939–961 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902890130 [Google Scholar]
- Z. D. Kirbulut, “Using Three-Tier Diagnostic Test to Assess Students’ Misconceptions of States of Matter,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., 10(5), 509–521 (2014). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1128a [Google Scholar]
- S. Ainsworth, “DeFT: A Conceptual Framework for Learning with Multiple Representations,” Learn. Instr., 16, 183–198 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001 [Google Scholar]
- M. Popova and S. L. Bretz, “Organic Chemistry Students’ Challenges with Coherence Formation between Mechanisms and Reaction-Coordinate Diagrams,” Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 19, 732–740 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RP00064F [Google Scholar]
- S. L. Lohr, Sampling: Design and Analysis (2nd ed.), Chapman & Hall/CRC (2021). [Google Scholar]
- C. H. Lawshe, “A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity,” Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x [Google Scholar]
- C. Ayre and A. J. Scally, “Critical Values for Lawshe’s Content Validity Ratio: Revisiting the Original Methods of Calculation,” Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 47(1), 79–86 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175613513808 [Google Scholar]
- S. M. Downing and T. M. Haladyna (eds.), Handbook of Test Development, Lawrence Erlbaum (2006). [Google Scholar]
- N. I. Rashwan, S. R. Aref, O. A. Nayel, and M. H. Rizk, “Postexamination item analysis of undergraduate pediatric multiple-choice questions exam: implications for developing a validated question bank,” BMC Medical Education, 24, Article 168 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05153-3 [Google Scholar]
- J. P. Walker and V. Sampson, “Argument-Driven Inquiry as a Way to Help Students Write to Learn by Learning to Write in General Chemistry Laboratory,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., 50(5), 561–596 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21082 [Google Scholar]
- I. Caspari and N. Graulich, “Scaffolding the structure of organic chemistry students’ multivariate comparative mechanistic reasoning,” Int. J. Phys. Chem. Educ., 11(2), 29–42 (2019). https://doi.org/10.12973/ijpce/211359 [Google Scholar]
- I. Testa, A. Colantonio, S. Galano, I. Marzoli, F. Trani, & U.S. Uccio, “Effects of instruction on students’ overconfidence in introductory quantum mechanics,” Physical Review Physics Education Research (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.010143 [Google Scholar]
- B. Eilks and B. Byers (eds.), Innovative Methods of Teaching and Learning Chemistry in Higher, Royal Society of Chemistry, 2015. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.