Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 701, 2026
Conference in Advancements in Sustainable Engineering (CASE25)
Article Number 01009
Number of page(s) 14
Section Architecture, Built Environment and Energy
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202670101009
Published online 23 March 2026
  1. Architects’ Council of Europe. (2022). Towards a level playing field: Professional mobility and regulatory diversity in the EU construction sector. https://www.ace-cae.eu [Google Scholar]
  2. Baldwin, R. E., & Wyplosz, C. (2020). The economics of European integration (6th ed.). McGrawHill Education. [Google Scholar]
  3. Barnard, C. (2013). The substantive law of the EU: The four freedoms (4th ed.). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  4. European Commission. (2020). Study on the development of a common European building code. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2873/463943 [Google Scholar]
  5. European Commission. (2023). The EU construction ecosystem transition pathway. Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs. https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu [Google Scholar]
  6. European Construction Industry Federation. (2021). Position paper on regulatory barriers in the internal market for construction services. https://fiec.eu [Google Scholar]
  7. European Parliament. (2022). Harmonisation of building codes in the EU: Obstacles and opportunities. Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies. https://www.europarl.europa.eu [Google Scholar]
  8. Gornitzka, Å., & Sverdrup, U. (2011). Accessing and shaping decision-making in the European Union: The role of national regulatory agencies. West European Politics, 34(2), 308–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.546568 [Google Scholar]
  9. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2009). A post functionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000409 [Google Scholar]
  10. Pelkmans, J. (2007). Single market: Deepening and widening. In M. Cini (Ed.), European Union politics (pp. 287–304). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sabel, C. F., & Zeitlin, J. (2008). Learning from difference: The new architecture of experimentalist governance in the EU. European Law Journal, 14(3), 271–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2008.00415.x [Google Scholar]
  12. Sun, J.-M., & Pelkmans, J. (1995). Regulatory competition in the Single Market. Journal of Common Market Studies, 33(1), 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.1995.tb00491.x [Google Scholar]
  13. Trubek, D. M., & Trubek, L. G. (2005). Hard and soft law in the construction of social Europe: [Google Scholar]
  14. The role of the Open Method of Coordination. European Law Journal, 11(3), 343–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2005.00263.x [Google Scholar]
  15. Williamson, O. E. (2000). The new institutional economics: Taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), 595–613. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.38.3.595 [Google Scholar]
  16. World Bank. (2021). Doing business in the European Union 2021: Comparing regulation in 27 cities in Bulgaria, Hungary, and Romania. https://www.doingbusiness.org [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.