Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 702, 2026
Second International Conference on Innovations in Sustainable and Digital Construction Practices (ISDCP 2026)
Article Number 01007
Number of page(s) 9
Section Construction Management & Materials
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202670201007
Published online 01 April 2026
  1. D. Lal, A. Chatterjee, A. Dwivedi, Investigation of properties of cement mortar incorporating pond ash-an environmental sustainable material. Constr. Build. Mater. 209, 20–31 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.049 [Google Scholar]
  2. J.S. Yadav, S.K. Tiwari, Behaviour of cement stabilized treated coir fibre- reinforced clay-pond ash mixtures. J. Build. Eng. 8, 131–140 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2016.10.006 [Google Scholar]
  3. A.Y. Pande, A.H. Padade, Engineering potential of pond ash geomaterial: a lightweight filling solution. Int. J. Geomech. 24, 04024175 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1061/ijgnai.gmeng-8388 [Google Scholar]
  4. Y. Kandasamy, B. Thangavel, K.K. Sukumar, B. Ravi, Strength properties of engineered cementitious composites containing pond ash and steel fiber. Materia 29, e20230277 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1590/1517-7076-RMAT-2023-0277 [Google Scholar]
  5. T. Xie, T. Ozbakkaloglu, Behavior of low-calcium fly and bottom ash-based geopolymer concrete cured at ambient temperature. Ceram. Int. 41, 5945–5958 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.01.031 [Google Scholar]
  6. N. Singh, M.M. Haque, A. Gupta, Reviewing mechanical performance of geopolymer concrete containing coal bottom ash. Mater. Today Proc. 65, 14491458 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.408 [Google Scholar]
  7. K. Yuvaraj, S. Ramesh, M. Velumani, Predicting the mechanical strength of coal pond ash based geopolymer concrete using linear regression method. Mater. Today Proc. (In press). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.514 [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Panigrahi, R.I. Ganguly, R.R. Dash, Pond ash (PA)-based geopolymer cementitious materials. Dev. Geopolymer Pond Ash Therm. Power Plant Waste, 91121 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394167975.ch3 [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Sharma, A.K. Vyas, Evaluation of mechanical properties of cement mortars containing pond ash as partial replacement of river sand and prediction of properties by regression models. Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng. 28, 2679–2710 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2024.2325034 [Google Scholar]
  10. A.L.I. Qelik, Y. Ozkilic, Geopolymer concrete with high strength, workability and setting time using recycled steel wires and basalt powder. Steel Compos. Struct. 46, 5 (2023). https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2023.465689 [Google Scholar]
  11. A.I. Qelik, Mechanical performance of geopolymer concrete based on basalt and marble powder. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Civ. Eng. 47, 2173–2187 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-023-01063-4 [Google Scholar]
  12. G.A. Metwally, W.E. Elemam, M. Mahdy, M. Ghannam, M. Metakaolin-based ultra-high-performance geopolymer concrete, role of basalt, glass, granite, and marble waste powders. Inno. Infra. Solu. 10, 527 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-025-02281-7 [Google Scholar]
  13. U. Yurt, S. Celikten, I.I. Atabey, Post-fire residual mechanical and microstructural properties of waste basalt and glass powder-based geopolymer mortars. J. Build. Eng. 94, 109941 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.109941 [Google Scholar]
  14. D. Mrozek, M. Mrozek, R. Krzywon, Mechanical properties of geopolymers synthesized using basalt powder as a partial substitute for metakaolin. Sci. Rep. 15, 13156 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-96447-z [Google Scholar]
  15. O. Chakkor, M.F. Altan, O. Canpolat, H. Dilbas, M. Uysal, Relative performance of limestone, marble, and basalt powders in replacement of a recycled fine aggregate from red mud and metakaolin-based geopolymer mortar. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Civ. Eng. 46, 2961–2974 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-021-00810-9 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.