Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 702, 2026
Second International Conference on Innovations in Sustainable and Digital Construction Practices (ISDCP 2026)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01016 | |
| Number of page(s) | 16 | |
| Section | Construction Management & Materials | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202670201016 | |
| Published online | 01 April 2026 | |
- Al-Mutairi, N., & Terro, M. (2021). Utilization of medical waste ash in cement-based materials: Mechanical performance and environmental implications. Construction and Building Materials, 285, 122872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122872. [Google Scholar]
- Anwar, A., Umer, A., & Shah, A. (2023). Mechanical and durability characteristics of geopolymer concrete with blended calcium-rich binders. Journal of Cleaner Production, 421, 138457. https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138457. [Google Scholar]
- Bagheri, A., Hossain, K.M.A., & Maleki, M. (2020). Alkali-activated slag-fly ash binders: Fresh and hardened properties. Cement and Concrete Composites, 112, 103690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103690. [Google Scholar]
- Basu, S., & Chattopadhyay, A. (2019). Biomedical waste disposal and health risk assessment: A global review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(18), 18355–18370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05263-y. [Google Scholar]
- Browne, A., O’Reilly, M., & Li, K. (2018). Soil and groundwater contamination by landfilled medical residues: A toxicity-driven assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 225, 120–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.087. [Google Scholar]
- He, J., Zhang, W., & Wang, Y. (2022). Influence of alkali activator dosage and silicate modulus on strength development of slag-based geopolymer concrete. Materials Today Communications, 33, 104588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104588. [Google Scholar]
- Islam, M.M., & Patwary, A. (2023). Environmental sustainability performance of geopolymers in comparison with OPC: A review on lifecycle emissions and resource consumption. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 191, 106916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.106916. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, S., Sahu, R., & Das, A. (2022). Biomedical incineration ash as a secondary raw material: Composition, leaching behaviour, and valorisation potential. Waste Management, 143, 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2022.02.018. [Google Scholar]
- Koshy, A., & Mary, B. (2021). Quantifying the global escalation of healthcare waste generation during pandemics. Science of the Total Environment, 795, 148832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148832. [Google Scholar]
- Nath, P., & Sarker, P.K. (2022). High-calcium geopolymer binders incorporating slag for enhanced early-age strength. Cement and Concrete Research, 159, 106876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106876. [Google Scholar]
- Oyedun, A.O., Lam, K., & Hui, C. (2020). Sustainable disposal of biomedical waste during global crises: Challenges and innovations. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 132, 110043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110043. [Google Scholar]
- Rashidi, M., & Shah, K. (2023). Engineering behaviour and environmental safety of geopolymer concrete incorporating hazardous waste derivatives. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 456, 131710. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjhazmat.2023.131710. [Google Scholar]
- Singh, P., Mahajan, R., & Thakur, P. (2023). Trends in biomedical incineration and associated ash management: A global review. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 11(1), 109314. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjece.2022.109314. [Google Scholar]
- Srinivasan, R., & Sathiya, K. (2021). Performance assessment of GGBS-based geopolymer concrete: Workability, strength and durability considerations. Materials Today: Proceedings, 46, 9321–9327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.03.567. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Z., Provis, J.L., & Reid, A. (2022). Advances in geopolymer science: Reaction mechanism, activators, and performance optimization. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 105(8), 4712–4734. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.18350. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.