Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 702, 2026
Second International Conference on Innovations in Sustainable and Digital Construction Practices (ISDCP 2026)
Article Number 02007
Number of page(s) 13
Section Environmental Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202670202007
Published online 01 April 2026
  1. M. Velis, K.I. Conti, and F. Biermann. Groundwater and human development: synergies and trade-offs within the context of the sustainable development goals. Sustain. Sci. 12, 1007 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/S11625-017-0490-9 [Google Scholar]
  2. J.O. Alao, A. Bello, H. Lawal, and D. Abdullahi. Assessment of groundwater challenge and the sustainable management strategies. Results in Earth Sciences. 2, 100049 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RINES.2024.100049 [Google Scholar]
  3. R. Mostafazadeh, M. Malaekah, M. Hussain, and P. Hama Karim. Quantitative assessment of groundwater resources depletion in Herat area, Afghanistan. Advances in Civil Engineering and Environmental Science. 1(1), 38–47 (2024). https://doi.org/10.22034/acees.2024.457658.1003 [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Shuaibu, R.M. Kalin, V. Phoenix, and I.M. Lawal. Geochemical evolution and mechanisms controlling groundwater chemistry in the transboundary Komadugu-Yobe Basin, Lake Chad region: An integrated approach of chemometric analysis and geochemical modeling. J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud. 57, 102098 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJRH.2024.102098 [Google Scholar]
  5. S.K. Abanyie, O.B. Apea, S.A. Abagale, E.E.Y. Amuah, and E.D. Sunkari. Sources and factors influencing groundwater quality and associated health implications: A review. Emerg. Contam. 9, 100207 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EMCON.2023.100207 [Google Scholar]
  6. M.G. Uddin, S. Nash, and A.I. Olbert. A review of water quality index models and their use for assessing surface water quality. Ecol. Indic. 122, 107218 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2020.107218 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. F.A. Ababakr, K.O. Ahmed, A. Amini, et al. Spatio-temporal variations of groundwater quality index using geostatistical methods and GIS. Appl. Water Sci. 13, 206 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-023-02010-4 [Google Scholar]
  8. V. Anand, B. Oinam, and S. Wieprecht. Machine learning approach for water quality predictions based on multispectral satellite imageries. Ecol. Inform. 84, 102868 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOINF.2024.102868 [Google Scholar]
  9. M.A.A.M. Hridoy, A.I. Shawkat, C. Bordin, M.R. Acharjee, A. Masood, A.O. Baki, and M.A. Al Mamun. Advanced machine learning models for accurate water quality classification and WQI prediction: Implications for aquatic disease risk management. Sci. Total Environ. 1008, 180965 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2025.180965 [Google Scholar]
  10. M.S. Hossain, N. Nahar, M.R. Shaibur, M.T. Bhuiyan, A.B. Siddique, A. Al Maruf, and A.S. Khan. Hydro-chemical characteristics and groundwater quality evaluation in southwestern region of Bangladesh: A GIS-based approach and multivariate analyses. Heliyon. 10, e24011 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2024.E24011 [Google Scholar]
  11. N.L. Kushwaha, N. Biwalkar, K. Sur, and J. Rajput. Integrating water quality indices with machine learning algorithms for groundwater suitability in Punjab: Implications for drinking and sustainable irrigation. J. Water Process Eng. 76, 108253 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JWPE.2025.108253 [Google Scholar]
  12. K.O. Ahmed, M.H. Malaekah, J. Bahrami, and R. Mostafazadeh. Assessment of groundwater quality for drinking purposes in Herat Province, Afghanistan: A water quality index approach. Journal of Studies in Civil Engineering. 3(1), 1 (2026). https://doi.org/10.53898/jsce202631112 [Google Scholar]
  13. V. Svetnik, A. Liaw, C. Tong, J. Christopher Culberson, R.P. Sheridan, and B.P. Feuston. Random Forest: A classification and regression tool for compound classification and QSAR modeling. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 43, 1947–1958 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1021/CI034160G15 [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Seyedrahimi-Niaraq, H. Mahdiyanfar, and M.H. Olyaee. Comparison of the performance of gradient boost, linear regression, decision tree, and voting algorithms to separate geochemical anomalies areas in the fractal environment. Artificial Intelligence in Geosciences. 6, 100156 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AnG.2025.10015616 [Google Scholar]
  15. N.B. Shaik, K. Jongkittinarukorn, and K. Bingi. XGBoost based enhanced predictive model for handling missing input parameters: A case study on gas turbine. Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng. 10, 100775 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CSCEE.2024.10077517 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.