Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 702, 2026
Second International Conference on Innovations in Sustainable and Digital Construction Practices (ISDCP 2026)
Article Number 07002
Number of page(s) 12
Section Transportation Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202670207002
Published online 01 April 2026
  1. W.G. Hansen, How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25 (2), 73–76 (1959). https://doi.org/10.1080/01944365908978307 [Google Scholar]
  2. K.T. Geurs, B. Van Wee, Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: Review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography, 12 (2), 127–140 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. R.W. Vickerman, Accessibility, attraction, and potential: A review of some concepts and their use in determining mobility. Environment and Planning A, 6 (6), 675–691 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1068/a060675 [Google Scholar]
  4. D.R. Ingram, The concept of accessibility: A search for an operational form. Regional Studies, 5 (2), 101–107 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1080/09595237100185131 [Google Scholar]
  5. P. Apparicio, M. Abdelmajid, M. Riva, R. Shearmur, Comparing alternative approaches to measuring the geographical accessibility of urban health services: Distance types and aggregation-error issues. International Journal of Health Geographics, 7 (1), 7 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-7-7 [Google Scholar]
  6. B. Jiang, C. Claramunt, Topological analysis of urban street networks. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31 (1), 151–162 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1068/b306 [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Mishra, T.F. Welch, M.K. Jha, Performance indicators for public transit connectivity in multimodal transportation networks. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46 (7), 1066–1085 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2012.04.006 [Google Scholar]
  8. A.T. Murray, X. Wu, Accessibility trade-offs in public transit planning. Journal of Geographical Systems, 5 (1), 93–107 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s101090300104 [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Sarkar, An index of accessibility for rural development. Social Indicators Research, 114 (3), 1113–1128 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0190-3 [Google Scholar]
  10. K.S. Sahitya, C.S.R.K. Prasad, GIS-based urban road network accessibility analysis using intelligent models. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 144 (4), 04018033 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000487 [Google Scholar]
  11. L. Breiman, Random forests. Machine Learning, 45 (1), 5–32 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Y. Wang, Z. Liu, F. Chen, A comparison of ensemble and kernel-based machine learning methods for traffic prediction. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 103, 1–17 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.03.002 [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Mishra, T.F. Welch, M.K. Jha, Public transit accessibility: A framework for evaluating connectivity performance. In Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting. Washington, DC, USA, (2011). [Google Scholar]
  14. B. Jiang, X. Liu, Street-based topological representations and analyses for predicting traffic flow. In Proceedings of the 12th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. IEEE (2009). [Google Scholar]
  15. J. Wang, X. Li, Y. Liu, Measuring urban accessibility using GIS and network analysis. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Transportation and Development. ASCE (2016). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.