Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 708, 2026
7th International Conference on Smart Applications and Water Information Systems: “Intelligent Systems, Geospatial Technologies and Modeling for the Sustainable Management of Water Resources” (SAWIS 2025)
Article Number 02001
Number of page(s) 6
Section Water Quality, Treatment, and Environmental Processes
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202670802001
Published online 30 April 2026
  1. A.H. Haghiabi, A.H. Nasrolahi, and A. Parsaie, . Water quality prediction using machine learning methods. Water Quality Research Journal, 53(1), pp.3-13, (2018). https://doi.org/10.2166/wqrj.2018.025 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. X. Yan, ; T. Zhang, ; W. Du, ; Q. Meng, ; X. Xu, ; X. Zhao. A Comprehensive Review of Machine Learning for Water Quality Prediction over the Past Five Years. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 12, 159, (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12010159 [Google Scholar]
  3. M.Y. Shams, A.M. Elshewey, ES.M. El-kenawy, et al. Water quality prediction using machine learning models based on grid search method. Multimed Tools Appl 83, 35307-35334 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-16737-4 [Google Scholar]
  4. U. Ahmed, , R. Mumtaz, H. Anwar, A.A. Shah, R. Irfan, and J. Garcia-Nieto, . Efficient water quality prediction using supervised machine learning. Water, 11(11), p.2210, (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/w11112210 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. F. Rustam, A. Ishaq, , S.T. Kokab, et al. An artificial neural network model for water quality and water consumption prediction. Water, 14 (21), p.3359, (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/w14213359 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Y. Bouchlaghem, Y. Akhiat, K. Touchanti, ; S Amjad, A novel feature selection method with transition similarity measure using reinforcement learning, Decision Analytics Journal, 11, 100477 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dqiour.2024.100477 [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Bahri et al., "AutoML: state of the art with a focus on anomaly detection, challenges, and research directions, " Int. J. Data Sci. Anal., vol. 14, pp. 113-126, (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41060-022-00309-0 [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Alsharef, , K. Kumar and C. Iwendi, . Time series data modeling using advanced machine learning and AutoML. Sustainability, 14(22), p.15292, (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215292 [Google Scholar]
  9. R. Avila, B. Horn, E. Moriarty, , R. Hodson and E. Moltchanova, . Evaluating statistical model performance in water quality prediction. Journal of environmental management, 206, pp.910-919, (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.049 [Google Scholar]
  10. S. K. Karmaker et al., "Automi to date and beyond: Challenges and opportunities, "ACMComput. Surv., vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 1-36, (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3470918 [Google Scholar]
  11. A. K. Shakya, G. Pillaiet, S. Chakrabarty, "Reinforcement learning algorithms: A brief survey, "Expert Syst. Appl.vol. 231, p. 120495, (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120495 [Google Scholar]
  12. B. Lundet J. Ma, "A review of cluster analysis techniques and their uses in library and information science research: k-means and k-medoids clustering, "Perform. Meas. Metrics, vol. 22, no.3, pp.161-173, (2021). https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-05-2021-0026 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.