EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 708 (2026) E3S Web Conf., 708 (2026) 03004 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 708, 2026
7th International Conference on Smart Applications and Water Information Systems: “Intelligent Systems, Geospatial Technologies and Modeling for the Sustainable Management of Water Resources” (SAWIS 2025)
Article Number 03004
Number of page(s) 11
Section GIS, AI Applications, and Risk Assessment
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202670803004
Published online 30 April 2026
  1. Bharath, K.K. Kumar, R. Maddamsetty, M. Manjunatha, R.B. Tangadagi, S. Preethi, Drainage morphometry based sub-watershed prioritization of Kalinadi basin using geospatial technology. Environ. Chall. 5, 100277(2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2021.100277 [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Gómez-Villar, J. Alvarez-Martinez, J.M. Garcia-Ruiz, Factors influencing the presence or absence of tributary-junction fans in the Iberian Range, Spain. Geomorphology 81, 252-264 (2006). https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.04.011 [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Javed, M.Y. Khanday, R. Ahmed, Prioritization of sub-watersheds based on morphometric and land use analysis using remote sensing and GIS techniques. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 37, 261-274 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Motevalli, M. Vafakhah, Flood Hazard Mapping Using Synthesis Hydraulic and Geomorphic Properties at Watershed Scale. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 30, 18891900 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Piqué, A. Michard, Moroccan Hercynides: A synopsis. The Palaeozoic sedimentary and tectonic evolution at the northern margin of West Africa. Am. J. Sci. 289, 286-330 (1989). [Google Scholar]
  6. C.D. Mishra, R.K. Jaiswal, A.K. Nema, V.K. Chandola, A. Chouksey, Priority assessment of sub-watershed based on optimum number of parameters using fuzzyAHP decision support system in the environment of RS and GIS. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 47, 603-617 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-018-0904-x [Google Scholar]
  7. D. Gasquet, G. Levresse, A. Cheilletz, M. R. Azizi-Samir, A. Mouttaqi, Contribution to a geodynamic reconstruction of the Anti-Atlas (Morocco) during Pan-African times with the emphasis on inversion tectonics and metallogenic activity at the Precambrian-Cambrian transition. Precambrian Res. 140(3-4), 157-182 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  8. D.Y. Chang, Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 95, 649-655 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  9. E. Tazik, Z. Jahantab, M. Bakhtiari, A. Rezaei, S.K. Alavipanah, Landslide Susceptibility Mapping by Combining the Three Methods Fuzzy Logic, Frequency Ratio and Analytical Hierarchy Process in DozainBasin. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 40, 267-272 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  10. G. Papaioannou, L. Vasiliades, A. Loukas, Multi-Criteria Analysis Framework for Potential Flood Prone Areas Mapping. WaterResour. Manag. 29, 399-418 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  11. H. Bendjoudi, P. Hubert, The Gravelius compactness coefficient: critical analysis of a shape index for drainage basins. Hydrol. Sci. J 47, 921-930 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/02626660209493000 [Google Scholar]
  12. J. Mallick, V. Shivhare, C.K. Singh, M. Al Subih, Prioritizing Watershed Restoration, Management, and Development Based on Geo-Morphometric Analysis in Asir Region of Saudi Arabia Using Geospatial Technology. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 31(2022). https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/142158 [Google Scholar]
  13. J.J. Buckley, Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 17, 233-247 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9 [Google Scholar]
  14. K.B. Hamed, A. Bouanani, Caractérisation d’un bassin versant par l’analyse statistique des paramètres morphométriques : Cas du bassin versant de la Tafna. (Nord-ouest algérien).Geo-Eco-Trop 40, 277-286 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  15. L. Mikhailov, A fuzzy programming method for deriving priorities in the analytic hierarchy process. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 51, 341-349(2000). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600899 [Google Scholar]
  16. L.A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8, 338-353 (1965) .https://doi.org/10.1016/S00199958(65)90241-X [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Ghosh, D. Gope, Hydro-morphometric characterization and prioritization of subwatersheds for land and water resource management using fuzzy analytical hierarchical process (FAHP): a case study of upper Rihand watershed of Chhattisgarh State, India. Appl. Water Sci. 11, 17 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Giandotti, Previsione delle piene e delle magre dei corsid’acqua. Memorie E StudiIdrografici 8, 107-117 (1934). [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Kordi, Incorporating fuzzy logic into decision making and evaluation in GIS: Weighted linear combination and ordered weighted averaging, in University of Toronto Thesis (2008). [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Obeidat, M. Awawdeh, F. Al-Hantouli, Morphometric analysis and prioritisation of watersheds for flood risk management in Wadi Easal Basin (WEB), Jordan, using geospatial technologies. J. Flood Risk Manag. 14, e12711 2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12711 [Google Scholar]
  21. M. Tanguy, Cartographie du risque d’inondation en milieu urbain adaptée à la gestion de crise : Analyse préliminaire (INRS-Eau, Terre et Environnement, Quebec City, QC, Canada, 2012). [Google Scholar]
  22. M.A. Haddou, A. Wanaim, M. Ikirri, A. Aydda, Y. Bouchriti, M. Abioui, B. Kabbachi, Digital Elevation Model-Derived Morphometric Indices for Physical Characterization of the Issen Basin (Western High Atlas of Morocco). Ecol. Eng. Environ. Technol. 23, 285-298(2022). https://doi.org/10.12912/27197050/152161 [Google Scholar]
  23. P. Dubreuil, M. Morell, P. Séchet, Comportement et interactions des paramètres physiques des petits bassins versants semi-arides et intertropicaux. Cah. Orstom, Sér. Hydrol. 13, 13-36 (1975). [Google Scholar]
  24. P. Sridhar, S. Ganapuram, Morphometric analysis using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) and geographic information systems (GIS) for the prioritization of watersheds. Arab. J. Geosci. 14, 236 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  25. P.D. Sreedevi, K. Subrahmanyam, S. Ahmed, The significance of morphometric analysis for obtaining groundwater potential zones in a structurally controlled terrain. Environ. Geol. 47, 412-420 (2004) .https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-004-1166-1 [Google Scholar]
  26. P.J. Van Laarhoven, W. Pedrycz, A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 11, 229-241 (1983). [Google Scholar]
  27. R. Ahmed, H. Sajjad, I. Husain, Morphometric parameters-based prioritization of subwatersheds using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process: A case study of lower Barpani Watershed, India. Nat. Resour. Res. 27, 67-75 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  28. R.E. Horton, Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins; hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 56, 275-370 (1945). [Google Scholar]
  29. R.K. Jaiswal, T. Thomas, R.V. Galkate, N.C. Ghosh, S. Singh, Watershed prioritization using Saaty’s AHP based decision support for soil conservation measures.WaterResour. Manag. 28, 475-494 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  30. S.A. Genchi, A.J. Vitale, G.M.E. Perillo, M.C. Piccolo, Geomorphometric assessment of drainage systems in a semi-arid region of Argentina using geospatial tools and multivariate statistics. Earth Sci. Inform. 9, 309-324 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-016-0258-2 [Google Scholar]
  31. S.A. Rahaman, S.A. Ajeez, S. Aruchamy, R. Jegankumar, Prioritization of sub watershed based on morphometric characteristics using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process and geographical information system-A study of Kallar Watershed, Tamil Nadu//o£ Procedia 4, 1322-1330 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  32. S.G. Meshram, E. Alvandi, V.P. Singh, C. Meshram, Comparison of AHP and fuzzy AHP models for prioritization of watersheds. Soft Comput. 23, 13615-13625 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  33. S.K. Chandniha, M.L. Kansal, Prioritization of sub-watersheds based on morphometric analysis using geospatial technique in Piperiya watershed, India. /ppl. Water Sci. 7, 329-338 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-014-0248-9 [Google Scholar]
  34. S.K. Dhanush, M.M. Murthy, A. Sathish, Quantitative morphometric analysis and prioritization of sub-watersheds for soil erosion susceptibility: A comparison between fuzzy analytical hierarchy process and compound parameter analysis method. WaterResour. Manag. 38, 1587-1606 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  35. S.K. Dhanush, M.M. Murthy, A. Sathish, Quantitative morphometric analysis and prioritization of sub-watersheds for soil erosion susceptibility: A comparison between fuzzy analytical hierarchy process and compound parameter analysis method, ines. Sq. (2023). https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5532-9125 [Google Scholar]
  36. T. Jobin, J. Sabu, K.P. Thrivikramaji, Morphometric aspects of a small tropical mountain river system, the southern Western Ghats, India. Int. J. Digit. Earth 3, 135-156 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/17538940903464370 [Google Scholar]
  37. T.L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980). [Google Scholar]
  38. W.J. Han, W.D. Tsay, Formulation of quality strategy using analytic hierarchy process, in wenty seven annual meeting of the western decision science institute, University of Northern Colorado, USA (1998), pp. 580-583. [Google Scholar]
  39. X. Yang, J. Ding, H. Hou, Application of a Triangular Fuzzy AHP Approach for Flood Risk Evaluation and Response Measures Analysis. Nat. Hazards 68, 657-74 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  40. Y. Hategekimana, L. Yu, Y. Nie, J. Zhu, F. Liu, F. Guo, Integration of MultiParametric Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and GIS along the UNESCO World Heritage: A Flood Hazard Index, Mombasa County, Kenya. Nat. Hazards 92, 1137-1153 (2018). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.