Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 709, 2026
2026 12th International Conference on Environment and Renewable Energy (ICERE 2026)
Article Number 04003
Number of page(s) 11
Section Assessment, Performance, and Trends of Renewable Energy Systems
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202670904003
Published online 07 May 2026
  1. D. Gayen, R. Chatterjee, and S. Roy, “A review on environmental impacts of renewable energy for sustainable development,” Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 21, 5285 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  2. N. Prasad, M. K. Singhal, and A. Kumar, “Performance of axial flow hydrokinetic turbines: A comprehensive review,” Ocean Eng. 335, 121715 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  3. U. Bajpai and S. K. Singal, “Techno-economic analysis of In-stream technology: A review,” Int. J. Green Energy 21, 328 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  4. M. J. Khan, G. Bhuyan, M. T. Iqbal, and J. E. Quaicoe, “Hydrokinetic energy conversion systems and assessment of horizontal and vertical axis turbines for river and tidal applications: A technology status review,” Appl Energy. 86, 1823 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Yadav, A. Kumar and C. S. Pant, “Selection criteria for hydro kinetic turbines and implications,” Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 228, 116594 (2026) [Google Scholar]
  6. U. Bajpai, M. Sood, and S. K. Singal, “A Comprehensive Investigation of Wake Recovery Distance of Modified Savonius Turbine with Vertical and Horizontal Alignment,” in Lect. Notes Civ. Eng. (Springer, Singapore, 2025), pp. 65–82 [Google Scholar]
  7. V. S. Neary, B. Gunawan, C. Hill, and L. P. Chamorro, “Near and far field flow disturbances induced by model hydrokinetic turbine: ADV and ADP comparison,” Renew. Energy 60, 1 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Provan, A. Cornett, P. Knox, J. Cousineau, and S. Ferguson, “Experimental Study of the Wake Produced by Single And Multiple Cross-Flow Turbines,” J. Ocean Technol. 14, 1 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  9. A. K. Nag and S. Sarkar, “Techno-economic analysis of a micro-hydropower plant consists of hydrokinetic turbines arranged in different array formations for rural power supply,” Renew. Energy 179, 475 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Chalaca, L. Velásquez, A. Rubio-Clemente, and E. Chica, “Design and Optimization of a Gorlov-Type Hydrokinetic Turbine Array for Energy Generation Using Response Surface Methodology,” Energies 17, 4870 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  11. E. Fakhri, J. Thiebot, S. Bourguet, M. MacHmoum, and H. Gualous, “Optimization of Marine Current Turbines Arrangement Using a Genetic AlgorithmApplication to the Fromveur Strait (France),” IEEE Int. Symp. Ind. Electron., 1057 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  12. A. López, J. L. Morán, L. R. Núñez, and J. A. Somolinos, “Study of a cost model of tidal energy farms in early design phases with parametrization and numerical values. Application to a second-generation device,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 117, (2020) [Google Scholar]
  13. E. Segura, R. Morales, and J. A. Somolinos, “Cost assessment methodology and economic viability of tidal energy projects,” Energies 10, 1 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  14. P. Gogoi, P. K. Parida, A. Sinha, T. Tayung, V. R. Suresh, and B. K. Das, “Canals in Indian Sundarbans :Oppprtunities towards livelihood improvement through fisheries intervention,” Indian Farming 70, 10 (2020) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.