EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 711 (2026) E3S Web Conf., 711 (2026) 01014 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 711, 2026
2026 2nd International Conference on Environmental Monitoring and Ecological Restoration (EMER 2026)
Article Number 01014
Number of page(s) 11
Section Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202671101014
Published online 19 May 2026
  1. Klink, Carlos Augusto C, and Ricardo B. R Machado. “Conservation of the Brazilian Cerrado.” Conservation Biology 19, no. 3 (2005): 707–713. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00702.x. [Google Scholar]
  2. Leung, Danny M. D, et al.. “A new process-based and scale-aware desert dust emission scheme for global climate models - Part II: Evaluation in the Community Earth System Model version 2 (CESM2).” Atmospheric chemistry and physics 24, no. 4 (2024): 2287–2318. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2287-2024. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ravi S, Breshears D D, Huxman T E, et al. Land degradation in drylands: Interactions among hydrologic-aeolian erosion and vegetation dynamics[J]. Geomorphology, 2010, 116(3-4): 236–245, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.11.023. [Google Scholar]
  4. Li L H, Zhang Y L, Wu J S, et al. Increasing sensitivity of alpine grasslands to climate variability along an elevational gradient on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 678: 21–29, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.399. [Google Scholar]
  5. Teng Y M, Zhan J Y, Liu W, et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics and drivers of wind erosion on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 123: 107340, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107340. [Google Scholar]
  6. Duniway M C, Pfennigwerth A A, Fick S E, et al. Wind erosion and dust from US drylands: a review of causes, consequences, and solutions in a changing world[J]. Ecosphere, 2019, 10(3): e02650, https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2650. [Google Scholar]
  7. Fan, Kaixuan K, et al.. “Assessing the relative contribution of climate change and human activity factors to spatiotemporal distributions of sand fixation service in the Loess Plateau.” GIScience & Remote Sensing 62, no. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2024.2444630. [Google Scholar]
  8. Alonso-González, Esteban E, et al.. “The snow cover is more important than other climatic variables on the prediction of vegetation dynamics in the Pyrenees (1981-2014).” Environmental Research Letters 19, no. 6 (2024): 064058–064058. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad4e4c. [Google Scholar]
  9. Li, Ziqi Z. “Extracting spatial effects from machine learning model using local interpretation method: An example of SHAP and XGBoost.” Computers Environment and Urban Systems 96 (2022): 101845–101845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101845. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhang, Junyi J, et al.. “Insights into geospatial heterogeneity of landslide susceptibility based on the SHAP-XGBoost model.” Journal of environmental management 332 (2023): 117357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117357. [Google Scholar]
  11. Beck, H., Zimmermann, N., McVicar, T. et al. Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution. Sci Data 5, 180214 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.214. [Google Scholar]
  12. Li, Huan H, et al.. “Environmental filtering increases with elevation for the assembly of gut microbiota in wild pikas.” Microbial biotechnology 12, no. 5 (2019): 976–992. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13450. [Google Scholar]
  13. Li, Yuefeng Y, et al.. “Control of local topography and surface patterning on the formation and stability of a slope permafrost peatland at 4800-m elevation on the central Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.” Ecological Indicators 158 (2023): 111475–111475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111475. [Google Scholar]
  14. Lin, Di-an D, et al.. “Variability of soil organic carbon with elevation gradient in the Yarlung Tsangpo River Basin on the southeastern Tibetan Plateau.” International Soil and Water Conservation Research 13, no. 4 (2025): 945–956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2025.06.005. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wu, Shaohong S, Yunhe Y Yin, Zheng Z Du, and Yang Y Qinye. “Climatic trends over the Tibetan Plateau during 1971-2000.” Journal of Geographical Sciences 17, no. 2 (2007): 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-007-0141-7. [Google Scholar]
  16. Liu, Xiaodong X, Aijuan A Bai, and Changhai C Liu. “Diurnal variations of summertime precipitation over the Tibetan Plateau in relation to orographically-induced regional circulations.” Environmental Research Letters 4, no. 4 (2009): 045203–045203. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/045203. [Google Scholar]
  17. Hall, Jaclyn M JM, et al.. “Scaling categorical spatial data for earth systems models.” Global change biology 21, no. 1 (2015): 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12708. [Google Scholar]
  18. Yang, Dazhi D, and Yaqun Y Liu. “Heterogeneous impacts of human activities and climate change on transformed vegetation dynamics on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.” Journal of environmental management 392 (2025): 126575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126575. [Google Scholar]
  19. Yuan, Hongyu H, Taoyong T Su, Guoqiang G Li, and Kewei K Li. “Numerical simulation investigation on aerodynamic characteristics of rotor in plateau environment.” Aerospace Science and Technology 155 (2024): 109628–109628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2024.109628. [Google Scholar]
  20. Yin, Ziyun Z, et al.. “A synthesis of Global Streamflow Characteristics, Hydrometeorology, and Catchment Attributes (GSHA) for large sample river-centric studies.” Earth system science data 16, no. 3 (2024): 1559–1587. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1559-2024. [Google Scholar]
  21. Jiapaer, Guli G, Xi X Chen, and Anming A Bao. “A comparison of methods for estimating fractional vegetation cover in arid regions.” Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 151, no. 12 (2011): 1698–1710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.07.004. [Google Scholar]
  22. He, J., Yang, K., Tang, W. Lu, H., Qin, J., Chen, Y.Y., & Li, X. (2020). The first high-resolution meteorological forcing dataset for land process studies over China. Scientific Data, 7, 25, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0369-y. [Google Scholar]
  23. FAO & IIASA. 2023. Harmonized World Soil Database version 2.0. Rome and Laxenburg. DOI: 10.4060/cc3823en. [Google Scholar]
  24. Fick, S.E. and R.J. Hijmans, 2017. WorldClim 2: new 1km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology 37 (12): 4302–4315. [Google Scholar]
  25. Che, T., Dai, L., Li, X. (2015). Long-term series of daily snow depth dataset in China (1979-2024). National Tibetan Plateau Third Pole Environment Data Center. https://doi.org/10.11888/Geogra.tpdc.270194. [Google Scholar]
  26. Li, M., Cao, S., Zhu, Z., Wang, Z., Myneni, R. B., and Piao, S.: Spatiotemporally consistent global dataset of the GIMMS Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (PKU GIMMS NDVI) from 1982 to 2022, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 4181–4203, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4181-2023, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhang, Gangfeng G, et al.. “An increase in wind erosion dominated by wind speed changes over the Tibetan Plateau from 1982 to 2020.” The Science of the total environment 998 (2025): 180278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.180278. [Google Scholar]
  28. Sun, Ranhao R, et al.. “Global Wind Erosion Reduction Driven by Changing Climate and Land Use.” Earth s Future 12, no. 10 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1029/2024ef004930. [Google Scholar]
  29. Li, Jiangyue J, Xiaofei X Ma, and Chi C Zhang. “Predicting the spatiotemporal variation in soil wind erosion across Central Asia in response to climate change in the 21st century.” The Science of the total environment 709 (2020): 136060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136060. [Google Scholar]
  30. Liao, Jie J, et al.. “No increase of soil wind erosion with the establishment of center pivot irrigation system in Mu-Us sandy land.” The Science of the total environment 939 (2024): 173558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173558. [Google Scholar]
  31. Xiao, Jianhua J, et al.. “Numerical simulation of the airflow at the world’s largest concentrated solar power plant in a desert region.” Solar Energy 232 (2022): 421–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2022.01.005. [Google Scholar]
  32. Osman, Ahmedbahaaaldin Ibrahem Ahmed A, et al. “Extreme gradient boosting (Xgboost) model to predict the groundwater levels in Selangor Malaysia.” Ain Shams Engineering Journal 12, no. 2 (2021): 1545–1556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.11.011. [Google Scholar]
  33. Yan, Hongyan H, et al.. “Investment estimation of prefabricated concrete buildings based on XGBoost machine learning algorithm.” Advanced Engineering Informatics 54 (2022): 101789–101789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2022.101789. [Google Scholar]
  34. Hamilton, R. I. R, and Panagiotis N. P Papadopoulos. “Using SHAP Values and Machine Learning to Understand Trends in the Transient Stability Limit.” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 39, no. 1 (2023): 1384–1397. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrs.2023.3248941. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kok, J. F., Parteli, E. J. R., Michaels, T. I., & Bou Karam, D. (2012). The physics of wind-blown sand and dust. Reports on Progress in Physics, 75(10), 106901. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/75/10/106901. [Google Scholar]
  36. Jiang, Y., Gao, Y., He, C., Liu, B., Pan, Y., & Li, X. (2021). Spatiotemporal distribution and variation of wind erosion over the Tibetan Plateau based on a coupled land-surface wind-erosion model. Aeolian Research, 50, 100699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2021.100699. [Google Scholar]
  37. Fan, Y., Du, H., Han, Z., Liu, X., Liu, X., & Li, Z. (2024). Assessment of dust emissions and their controlling factors on the Hoh Xil, north-central part of the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 24, 100487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2024.100487. [Google Scholar]
  38. Jinjiao, Hu., Qingping, Zhou., Quanheng, Cao., & Jian, Hu. (2022). Effects of ecological restoration measures on vegetation and soil properties in semi-humid sandy land on the southeast Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China. Global Ecology and Conservation, 33, e02000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e02000. [Google Scholar]
  39. Mayaud, J. R., & Webb, N. P. (2017). Vegetation in Drylands: Effects on Wind Flow and Aeolian Sediment Transport. Land, 6(3), https://doi.org/10.3390/land6030064 [Google Scholar]
  40. Gholami, H., Darvishi, E., Moradi, N., Mohammadifar, A., Song, Y., Li, Y., Niu, B., Kaskaoutis, D., & Pradhan, B. (2024). An interpretable (explainable) model based on machine learning and SHAP interpretation technique for mapping wind erosion hazard. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31(56), 64628–64643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-35521-x. [Google Scholar]
  41. Jarrah, M., Mayel, S., Tatarko, J., Funk, R., & Kuka, K. (2020). A review of wind erosion models: Data requirements, processes, and validity. Catena, 187, 104388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.104388. [Google Scholar]
  42. Liu, Xiufan, Du, Heqiang, Liu, Xinlei, Fan, Yawei, Li, Sen, Wang, Tao, & Guo, Zichen. (2024). An improvement of the Revised Wind Erosion Equation by considering the effect of non-photosynthetic vegetation. Geoderma, 445, 116880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.116880. [Google Scholar]
  43. Yan, Y., Wang, X., Guo, Z., Chen, J., Xin, X., Xu, D., Yan, R., Chen, B., & Xu, L. (2018). Influence of wind erosion on dry aggregate size distribution and nutrients in three steppe soils in northern China. Catena, 170, 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.06.013. [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhang, G.-F., Azorin-Molina, C., Chen, D., McVicar, T. R., Guijarro, J. A., Deng, K.-Q., Minola, L., Lee, J., Son, S.- W., Ma, H., & Shi, P.-J. (2024). Variability and trends of near-surface wind speed over the Tibetan Plateau: The role played by the westerly and Asian monsoon. Advances in Climate Change Research, 15(3), 525–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2024.04.007. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.