Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 713, 2026
8th International Symposium on Resource Exploration and Environmental Science (REES 2026)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01010 | |
| Number of page(s) | 7 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202671301010 | |
| Published online | 22 May 2026 | |
- Chen, Guoxiong, et al. “Identifying gravity anomalies caused by granitic intrusions in Nanling mineral district, China: a multifractal perspective.” Geophysical Prospecting 63.1 (2015): 256–270. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2478.12187 [Google Scholar]
- Essa, Khalid S., Eid R. Abo-Ezz, and Yves Géraud. “Utilizing the analytical signal method in prospecting gravity anomaly profiles.” Environmental Earth Sciences 80.17 (2021): 591. DOI: 10.1007/S12665-021-09811-3 [Google Scholar]
- Blakely, Richard J., and Robert W. Simpson. “Approximating edges of source bodies from magnetic or gravity anomalies.” Geophysics 51.7 (1986): 1494–1498. DOI:10.1190/1.1442197 [Google Scholar]
- Omosanya, K. O., et al. “Prediction of gravity anomaly from calculated densities of rocks.” Advances in Applied Science Research 3.4 (2012): 2059–2068. [Google Scholar]
- Weihaupt, John G., Alan Rice, and Frans G. Van der Hoeven. “Gravity anomalies of the Antarctic lithosphere.” Lithosphere 2.6 (2010): 454–461. DOI: 10.1130/L116.1 [Google Scholar]
- Hinze, William J., et al. “New standards for reducing gravity data: The North American gravity database.” Geophysics 70.4 (2005): J25–J32. [Google Scholar]
- Lo, Yu-Tsung, et al. “Bouguer gravity anomalies and the three-dimensional density structure of a thick mudstone area: A case study of southwestern Taiwan.” Tectonophysics 848 (2023): 229730. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, Wen-sheng, et al. “Gravity and magnetic anomalies and deep structure in the Sanjiang Basin.” Progress in Geophysics 29.6 (2014): 2620–2627. [Google Scholar]
- Zhanakulova, Katima, et al. “Application of Machine Learning Methods for Gravity Anomaly Prediction.” Geosciences 15.5 (2025): 175. DOI: 10.3390/GEOSCIENCES15050175 [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.