EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 715 (2026) E3S Web Conf., 715 (2026) 01014 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 715, 2026
2026 2nd International Conference on Eco-environmental Protection, Environmental Monitoring and Remediation (EPEMR 2026)
Article Number 01014
Number of page(s) 4
Section Environmental Monitoring, Assessment and Remediation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202671501014
Published online 03 June 2026
  1. Cai, Y., et al. (2023). Arsenic speciation and transformation in aquatic environments: A critical review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 53(12), 1089–1132. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ali, W., et al. (2018). A comprehensive review on current status, mechanism, and possible sources of arsenic contamination in groundwater: a global perspective with prominence of Pakistan scenario. Environ. Geochem. Health, 41, 737–760. [Google Scholar]
  3. Shakoor, M.B., et al. (2017). Human health implications, risk assessment and remediation of As-contaminated water: A critical review. Sci. Total Environ., 601–602, 756–769. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bundschuh, J., et al. (2012). One century of arsenic exposure in Latin America: A review of history and occurrence from 14 countries. Sci. Total Environ., 429, 2–35. [Google Scholar]
  5. Smedley, P.L. (2008). Sources and Distribution of Arsenic in Groundwater and Aquifers. In: Appelo, T. (Ed.), Arsenic in Groundwater: A World Problem. International Association of Hydrogeologists, Utrecht, pp.4–32. [Google Scholar]
  6. Nicolli, H.B., et al. (2012). Arsenic and associated trace-elements in groundwater from the Chaco-Pampean plain, Argentina: results from 100 years of research. Sci. Total Environ., 429, 36–56. [Google Scholar]
  7. Frommer, J., et al. (2011). Biogeochemical processes and arsenic enrichment around rice roots in paddy soil: results from micro-focused X-ray spectroscopy. Eur. J. Soil Sci., 62, 305–317. [Google Scholar]
  8. Li, J., et al. (2024). Engineering electron transfer in Fe-MOF derivatives for peroxymonosulfate activation toward simultaneous oxidation and adsorption of arsenic. Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 351, 123089. [Google Scholar]
  9. Wu, P.C., et al. (2023). Electrochemically-assisted intensification of As(III) removal through integrated alkalization and oxidation process. J. Hazard. Mater., 476(5), 135025. [Google Scholar]
  10. Preeyanghaa, M., et al. (2021). Complete arsenite removal from groundwater by UV activated potassium persulfate and iron oxide impregnated granular activated carbon. Chemosphere, 277, 130225. [Google Scholar]
  11. Katsoyiannis, I.A., et al. (2008). pH dependence of Fenton reagent generation and As(III) oxidation and removal by corrosion of zero valent iron in aerated water. Environ. Sci. Technol., 42(19), 7424–7430. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang, H., et al. (2023). Enhanced As(III) removal by zero-valent iron coupled with carbon-based conductor: The critical role of direct electron transfer. Environ. Sci. Technol., 57(18), 7245–7254. [Google Scholar]
  13. Mu, Y., et al. (2017). Iron oxide shell mediated environmental remediation properties of nano zero-valent iron. Environ. Sci.: Nano, 4(1), 27–45. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ainiwaer, M., et al. (2022). Synergistic removal of As(III) and Cd(II) by sepiolite-modified nanoscale zero-valent iron and a related mechanistic study. J. Environ. Manage., 319, 115658. [Google Scholar]
  15. Liu, K., et al. (2020). Simultaneous removal of Cd(II) and As(III) by graphene-like biochar-supported zero-valent iron from irrigation waters under aerobic conditions: Synergistic effects and mechanisms. J. Hazard. Mater., 395, 122623. [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen, W., et al. (2024). Zr-doped γ-Fe2O3 with tailored Lewis acidity for selective arsenic capture in the presence of competing phosphate. Chem. Eng. J., 476, 145432. [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhao, Y., et al. (2023). Size-selective and reversible arsenate adsorption in a layered iron hydroxide via interlayer gallery control. ACS ES&T Eng., 3(11), 1384–1393. [Google Scholar]
  18. Liu, S., et al. (2024). Carbon-encapsulated magnetic iron nanoparticles: Long-term stability and arsenic immobilization performance in simulated groundwater. Water Res., 256, 120287. [Google Scholar]
  19. Jia, X., et al. (2023). Formation and stability of arsenic-bearing ferric oxyhydroxides in hydrated ferric oxide systems: Implications for arsenic fixation. Environ. Sci. Technol., 57(22), 8765–8774. [Google Scholar]
  20. Calderon, B., et al. (2011). Heavy metal release due to aging effect during zero valent iron nanoparticles remediation. Water Res., 83, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhang, L., et al. (2024). Machine learning-guided design of iron-based materials for selective arsenic adsorption. Chem. Mater., 36(4), 1289–1298. [Google Scholar]
  22. Vega-Hernandez, S., et al. (2021). An integrated green methodology for the continuous biological removal and fixation of arsenic from acid wastewater through the GAC-catalyzed As(III) oxidation. Chem. Eng. J., 421, 127758. [Google Scholar]
  23. Takeuchi, H., et al. (2007). Arsenic resistance and removal by marine and non-marine bacteria. J. Biotechnol., 127(3), 434–442. [Google Scholar]
  24. Lièvremont, D., et al. (2009). Arsenic in contaminated waters: biogeochemical cycle, microbial metabolism and biotreatment processes. Biochimie, 91, 1229–1237. [Google Scholar]
  25. Wang, H., et al. (2021). Adsorption of antibiotics from water by using Chinese herbal medicine residues derived biochar: Preparation and properties studies. J. Mol. Liq., 325, 114967. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.