EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 723 (2026) E3S Web Conf., 723 (2026) 02008 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 723, 2026
2026 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Energy and Infrastructure (AIEI 2026)
Article Number 02008
Number of page(s) 6
Section Renewable Energy, Power Electronics & Energy Conversion
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202672302008
Published online 08 July 2026
  1. M. N. Amin, H. M. Hasanien, and A. Y. Abdelaziz, “A review of different control topologies of PMSG-based wind energy conversion systems,” in Proc. 23rd Int. Middle East Power Syst. Conf. (MEPCON), Cairo, Egypt, 2022, pp. 1–7, doi: 10.1109/MEPCON55441.2022.10021755. [Google Scholar]
  2. C. Kim and W. Kim, “Low-voltage ride-through coordinated control for PMSG wind turbines using de-loaded operation,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 66599–66606, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3076787. [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Novak, T. Ekelund, I. Jovik, and B. Schmidtbauer, “Modeling and control of variable-speed wind-turbine drive-system dynamics,” IEEE Control Syst. Mag., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 28–38, Aug. 1995, doi: 10.1109/37.408463.3 [Google Scholar]
  4. A. K. Singh, R. Krisham, and Y. Sood, “Modeling and Control of Grid Connected Variable Speed PMSG Based Wind Energy System,” in Proc. Conf. on Advances in Communication and Control Systems 2013 (CAC2S 2013), Hamirpur, India, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  5. H. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhu, and X. Wang, “Robust deadbeat predictive current control of induction motor drives with improved steady state performance,” IET Power Electron., vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 1823–1835, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1049/pel2.12469. [Google Scholar]
  6. Y. Zhang, W. Shen, and H. Yang, “An improved deadbeat predictive current control of PMSM drives based on the ultra-local model,” Chinese J. Electr. Eng., vol. 9, no. 2, Jun. 2023. [Google Scholar]
  7. K. Li, H. Shi, J. Zhang, C. Zhang, H. Wang, and Y. Sun, “Parameter robustness enhanced deadbeat control for DFIG with ESO-based disturbance estimation,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 15, Art. no. 12020, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.3390/su151512020. [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Kermadi et al., “Model-free deadbeat predictive current control for grid-connected inverters using autoregressive model and recursive least squares,” IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Topics Power Electron., vol. 13, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.1109/JESTPE.2025.3572359. [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Moos, “Predictive deadbeat control for PMSM drive,” M.S. thesis, Dept. Energy Technol., Aalborg Univ., Aalborg, Denmark, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  10. Y. El Mourabit, A. Derouich, A. Allouhi, A. El Ghzizal, N. El Ouanjli, and O. Zamzoum, “Sustainable production of wind energy in the main Morocco's sites using permanent magnet synchronous generators,” Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst., vol. 30, no. 4, Art. no. e12390, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1002/2050-7038.12390. [Google Scholar]
  11. D. Liu, Y. Fan, J. Liu, G. Wang, and L. Sheng, “Robust deadbeat predictive current control for unipolar sinusoidal excited SRM with multi-parameter mismatch compensation,” Sci. Rep., vol. 14, no. 1, Art. no. 23, 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-00000-0. [Google Scholar]
  12. Y. Izgheche and T. Bahi, “Adaptive backstepping and PID control strategy with genetic algorithm for PMSG by a grid-connected wind turbine,” Algerian J. Renew. Energy Sustain. Dev., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 127–135, Dec. 2023. [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Buso, T. Caldognetto, and D. I. Brandao, “Dead-Beat Current Controller for Voltage-Source Converters With Improved Large-Signal Response,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 1588–1598, March/April 2016. [Google Scholar]
  14. O. Elbeji, M. B. Hamed, and L. Sbita, “PMSG Wind Energy Conversion System: Modeling and Control,” International Journal of Modern Nonlinear Theory and Application, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 88–97, July 2014. doi: 10.4236/ijmnta.2014.33011. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.