EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 726 (2026) E3S Web Conf., 726 (2026) 01050 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 726, 2026
The Second International Congress on Environment, Energy, and Materials for Sustainable Development Technology (IC2EM-SDT’26)
Article Number 01050
Number of page(s) 11
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202672601050
Published online 13 July 2026
  1. M. Jain, D. Kumar, J. Chaudhary, S. Kumar, S. Sharma, and A. S. Verma, “Review on E-waste management and its impact on the environment and society,” Waste Manag. Bull., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 34–44, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wmb.2023.06.004. [Google Scholar]
  2. M. S. Hossain, S. M. Al-Hamadani, and M. T. Rahman, “E-waste : A Challenge for Sustainable Development, " J. Heal. Pollut., vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 3–11, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.5696/2156-9614-5-93 [Google Scholar]
  3. C. P. Baldé et al., Global E-waste Monitor 2024. ITU and UNITAR, Geneva/Bonn, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ewastemonitor.info/J Accessed: 23 February 2026]. [Google Scholar]
  4. A. K. Awasthi et al., “Assessing Strategic Management of E-Waste in Developing Countries,” vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 1–11, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097263. [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Q. Mairizal, A. Y. Sembada, K. M. Tse, and M. A. Rhamdhani, “Electronic waste generation, economic values, distribution map, and possible recycling system in Indonesia,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 293, p. 126096, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/jjclepro.2021.126096. [Google Scholar]
  6. R. Siringo, H. Herdiansyah, and R. D. Kusumawati, “Underlying factors behind the low participation rate in electronic waste recycling,” Glob. J. Environ. Sci. Manag., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 203–214, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.22034/gjesm.2020.02.06. [Google Scholar]
  7. F. N. Soetrisno and J. M. Delgado-saborit, “Chronic exposure to heavy metals from informal e-waste recycling plants and children ’ s attention, executive function and academic performance,” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 717, p. 137099, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137099. [Google Scholar]
  8. F. Yun Arifatul, K. Govindan, N. A. Sasongko, and Z. A. Hasibuan, “The critical success factors for sustainable resource management in circular economy : Assessment of urban mining maturity level,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 469, no. July, p. 143084, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/jjclepro.2024.143084. [Google Scholar]
  9. X. Pan, C. W. Y. Wong, and C. Li, “Circular economy practices in the waste electrical and electronic equipment ( WEEE ) industry : A systematic review and future research agendas,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 365, no. November 2022, p. 132671, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.02.006. [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Yu, E. Williams, M. Ju, and C. Shao, “Managing e-waste in China : Policies, pilot projects and alternative approaches,” Resources, Conserv. Recycl., vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 991–999, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.02.006. [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Borthakur, “Design, adoption and implementation of electronic waste policies in India,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 30, pp. 8672–8681, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18836-5. [Google Scholar]
  12. O. Bwanga, “How to Conduct a Qualitative Systematic Review to Guide Evidence-Based Practice in Radiography,” Int. J. Sci. Basic Appl. Res., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 205–213, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://www.gssrr.org/JournalOfBasicAndApplied/article/view/11276. [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Paul and A. R. Criado, “The art of writing literature review : What do we know and what do we need to know ?” Int. Bus. Rev., vol. 29, no. 4, p. 101717, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101717. [Google Scholar]
  14. D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D. G. Altman, and T. P. Group, “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and MetaAnalyses :The PRISMA Statement,” PLoS Med., vol. 6, no. 7, 2009, doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. [Google Scholar]
  15. V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qual. Res. Psychol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, 2006, doi: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. L. Ambarwati, “Serious Simulation Game Preliminary Design as Education Tool for Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Management System in Indonesia,” pp. 3–8, 2019, doi: 10.1109/APCoRISE46197.2019.9318919. [Google Scholar]
  17. K. Kurniawan, M. Dzikri, A. Soefihara, D. Chandra, and S. Kim, “Current status of the recycling of e-waste in Indonesia,” Geosystem Eng., vol. 25, no. 3-4, pp. 83–94, 2022, doi: 10.1080/12269328.2022.2142856. [Google Scholar]
  18. A. K. Attazahri, “Designing Scenarios for Integrated and Sustainable E-Waste Management : Case of Indonesia,” doi: 10.28992/ijsam.v5i2.387. [Google Scholar]
  19. FH. Adzania, Z Zakianis, RA. Wulandari, R. Ambarsari, S. Fauzia, and GP. Aryati, “Association between Socioeconomic and Demographic Factors with Electronic Waste Generation in Jakarta,” Ann Ig. 2023 May-Jun;35(3):269–281. doi: 10.7416/ai.2022.2536. Epub 2022 Jun 29. PMID: 35762444. [Google Scholar]
  20. H. Soesanto, M. S. Maarif, and Y. Yurianto, “Current status of household e-waste management in Jakarta, Indonesia,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2022, p. 1109 012042, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1109/1/012042. [Google Scholar]
  21. R. Ardi and B. H. Purwojatmiko, “Producer Perspective on Extended Producer Responsibility Concept : An Indonesian Case Study,” in the 5th International Conference on Industrial and Business Engineering (ICIBE 19), 2019, pp. 91–95, doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3364335.3364341. [Google Scholar]
  22. H. Maheswari, G. Yudoko, and A. Adhiutama, “Government and Intermediary Business Engagement for Controlling Electronic Waste in Indonesia : A Sustainable Reverse Logistics Theory through Customer Value Chain Analysis,” pp. 1–20, 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11030732. [Google Scholar]
  23. I. Haryanto and M. A. R. R. Dhelika, “Mechanical disassembly of waste PCBs : review of methods for removing through-hole technology and surface-mount technology components,” Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 23, 12 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-025-06903-6 [Google Scholar]
  24. N. Wibowo, R. Nurcahyo, and D. S. Gabriel, “Environmental awareness factor of used cell phones,” Glob. J. Environ. Sci. Manag., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 87–100, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.22034/gjesm.2022.01.07. [Google Scholar]
  25. A. Yoshida et al., “E-waste recycling processes in Indonesia, the Philippines, and Vietnam : A case study of cathode ray tube TVs and monitors,” Resources, Conserv. Recycl., vol. 106, no. 2016, pp. 48–58, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.10.020. [Google Scholar]
  26. D. Rimantho, S. Syaiful Nurfaida, , and U. Sulandari, “Electronic waste bank model as a solution for implementing circular economy : Case study DKI Jakarta-Indonesia,” Front. Built Environ., vol. 8, pp. 1–13, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2022.1030196. [Google Scholar]
  27. M. L. Firmansyah, I. N. Rizki, and N. Ullah, “Recent advances in urban mining technology : A focus on electronic waste recycling potential in Indonesia,” Clean. Waste Syst., vol. 10, no. 100239, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clwas.2025.100239. [Google Scholar]
  28. D. P. Sari, N. A. Masruroh, and A. M. Sri Asih, “Economic and Environmental Benefits of EWaste Management Networks Design in Yogyakarta Province, Indonesia,” J. Ind. Eng. Manag., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 292–320, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.6651. [Google Scholar]
  29. H. Maheswari, G. Yudoko and A. Adhiutama, "Quattro Helix Model To Build Stakeholders Engagement In Sustainable Reverse Logistics: A Conceptual Framework For Developing Countries, " 2019 IEEE 6th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications (ICIEA), Tokyo, Japan, 2019, pp. 541–545, doi: 10.1109/IEA.2019.8714864. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.