Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 727, 2026
International Conference on Electronics, Engineering Physics and Earth Science (EEPES 2026)
Article Number 02013
Number of page(s) 9
Section Renewable Energy and Green Technologies
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202672702013
Published online 27 July 2026
  1. I. Stoyanov, T. Iliev, An integrated approach for improvement of the efficiency of the photovoltaic system by using cogeneration. Bulgarian Chemical Communications, 52 C, pp. 46–52, (2020). https://doi.org/10.34049/bcc.52.c.0102 [Google Scholar]
  2. T. Todorov, I. Stoyanov, Optimizing the area of the photovoltaic system taking into account shading and other operational conditions. In 2024 5th International Conference on Communications, Information, Electronic and Energy Systems, Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria, 20-22 November, (2024). doi: 10.1109/CIEES62939.2024.10811269. [Google Scholar]
  3. D. Kurz et al., An Analysis of the Increase in Energy Efficiency of Photovoltaic Installations by Using Bifacial Modules. Energies, 18, 5, 1296, (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/en18051296 [Google Scholar]
  4. G. Badran, M. Dhimish, A Comparative Study of Bifacial versus Monofacial PV Systems at the UK Largest Solar Plant. Clean Energy, (2024). https://doi.org/10.1093/ce/zkae043 [Google Scholar]
  5. M. A. Araimi, M. A. Mandhari, A. Ghosh, Comparative analysis of bifacial and monofacial FPV system in the UK. Solar Compass, 13, 100106, (2025). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solcom.2025.100106 [Google Scholar]
  6. C. Hsieh et al., Performance and economic evaluation of monofacial and bifacial floating photovoltaic systems in Taiwan’s coastal marine climate. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 75, 107130, (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2025.107130 [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Hasan et al., “Performance evaluation of bifacial and monofacial floating photovoltaic systems: A case study under tropical conditions,” Results in Engineering, 29, 108791, (2025), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.108791. [Google Scholar]
  8. S. El Hassani et al., Comparative Performance Analysis of Bifacial and Monofacial Photovoltaic Panels: A Computational Analyses. E3S Web of Conferences, 680, 00012, (2025). https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202568000012 [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Mathew, A. Thomas, J. Manoj, A. Raj, Comparative study of bifacial and monofacial solar PV modules across diverse albedo conditions in India’s warm-humid tropical climate. Sustainable Chemistry for Climate Action, 8, 100200, (2026). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scca.2026.100200. [Google Scholar]
  10. S. M. Kamble, Comparative Study of Bifacial vs. Monofacial Solar Cells: A Comprehensive Efficiency and Cost-Benefit Analysis for Temperate Climates. Zenodo, 1 (2025). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18276786. [Google Scholar]
  11. H. D. Milan. R. Perera, Comparison of Performance between Bi-facial and Mono-facial 10kW Photovoltaic Power Systems. International Journal of Advances in Scientific Research and Engineering, 6, 5, 1–23, (2020). doi: https://doi.org/10.31695/ijasre.2020.33799. [Google Scholar]
  12. K. S. Hayibo, A. Petsiuk, P. Mayville, L. Brown, J. M. Pearce, Monofacial vs bifacial solar photovoltaic systems in snowy environments. Renewable Energy, 193, 657–668, (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.05.050 [Google Scholar]
  13. A. González-Moreno, D. Mazzeo, A. Dolara, Emanuele Ogliari, S. Leva, Outdoor Performance Comparison of Bifacial and Monofacial Photovoltaic Modules in Temperate Climate and Industrial-like Rooftops. Applied Sciences, 14, 13, 5714–5714, (2024). doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/app14135714 [Google Scholar]
  14. D. L. Dias, G. A. Rampinelli, G. N. Garrido, J. A. Tejero, M. S. de Cardona Ortín, L. E. Bremermann, Performance assessment of bifacial and monofacial PV systems on different types of soils in a low-latitude site. Renewable Energy, 246, 122868, (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2025.122868 [Google Scholar]
  15. A. A. Abdallah, M. Kivambe, B. Aïssa, B. W. Figgis, Performance of Monofacial and Bifacial Silicon Heterojunction Modules under Desert Conditions and the Impact of PV Soiling. Sustainability, 15, 10, 8436–8436, (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108436 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.