Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 728, 2026
2026 3rd International Conference on Environment Engineering, Urban Planning and Design (EEUPD 2026)
Article Number 01014
Number of page(s) 5
Section Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202672801014
Published online 27 July 2026
  1. SKB, SKB Tech. Rep. (2011). https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-concept-of-SKB-the-Swedish-Nuclear-Fuel-and-Waste-Management-Company-for-the_fig6_260633224. [Google Scholar]
  2. EBS report, EC Euroatom 7 (2012). https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/ref/2020/65/e3sconicegt2020_10006/e3sconLicegt2020_10006.html. [Google Scholar]
  3. R. Shaw, Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Pubi. 415, 1 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1144/SP415.17. [Google Scholar]
  4. R. Pusch and T. Forsberg, SKB Tech. Rep. 83–71 (1983). https://inis.iaea.org/records/xzwq2-7dz29. [Google Scholar]
  5. R. Pusch, L. Ranhagen and K. Nilsson, Nagra Tech. Rep. NTB 85–36 (1985). https://www.nagra.ch/en/reports/technical-report-ntb-85-36. [Google Scholar]
  6. R. Pusch, H. Hökmark, and L. Börgesson, SKB Tech. Rep. 87–10 (1987). https://skb.se/publikation/3253/TR87-10_OCR.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  7. T. Hokari, M. Okihara, T. Ishii and H. Ikuse, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 465, 1019 (1997). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-465-1019. [Google Scholar]
  8. K. Tanai, T. Kanno and C. Gallé, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 45, 1003 (1997). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-465-995. [Google Scholar]
  9. H.B. Hume, MSc thesis, University of Manitoba (1999). https://mspace.lib.umanitoba.ca/bitstream/1993/1674/1/MQ35063.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  10. J.F. Harrington and S.T. Horseman, Tech. Rep. TR-03-02 (2003). https://inis.iaea.org/records/v3b26-adf73. [Google Scholar]
  11. V. Gutiérrez-Rodrigo, M.V. Villar, P.L. Martin et al., in Unsaturated Soils: Research & Applications, CRC Press (2014). DOI:10.1201/b17034-253. [Google Scholar]
  12. M.V. Villar, CIEMAT Tech. Rep. CIEMT/DMA/2G207/07/12 (2012). https://documenta.ciemat.es/server/api/core/bitstreams/d3a6feaf-d8cd-4250-8f20-03276b2e51f0/content. [Google Scholar]
  13. J.F. Liu, Y. Wu, C.Z. Cai et al., Environ. Earth Sci. 77, 1 (2018). DOI:10.1007/s12665-018-7397-3. [Google Scholar]
  14. L.B. Liu, X.H. Wang, Z.L. Zhang et al., Hydrogeol. Eng. Geol. 29, 26 (2002). DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-3665.2002.06.007. [Google Scholar]
  15. L. Wang, X.W. Fang, C.N. Shen et al., Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng. 34, 3381 (2015). DOI: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2013.1500. [Google Scholar]
  16. J.F. Liu, H.Y. Ni, X.L. Cao, L.K. Ma, J.N. Guo and X. Chen, Eng. Geol. 276, 105761 (2020). DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105761. [Google Scholar]
  17. L. Xu, W. Ye, Y. Chen et al., J. Contam. Hydrol. 230, 103622 (2020). DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2020.103622. [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Âkesson, A. Jacinto, C. Gatabin, M. Sànchez and A. Ledesma, Géotechnique 59, 307 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2009.59.4.307. [Google Scholar]
  19. W.J. Cho, J.O. Lee and H.J. Choi, Ann. Nucl. Energy 50, 71 (2012). DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2012.07.010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. B. Zhou, A. Sahin and M. Sanchez, in GeoCongress 2022, Charlotte, NC, USA (2022). https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784484050.036. [Google Scholar]
  21. Y.M. Liu, J. Wang, S.F. Cao et al., Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng. 34, 8 (2013). DOI:CNKI:SUN:YTLX.0.2013-10-002. [Google Scholar]
  22. J. Smutek, L. Hausmannova and J. Svoboda, Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 443 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1144/SP443.5. [Google Scholar]
  23. Z. Liang, MSc thesis, Lanzhou University (2018). DOI: 10.7666/d.D01450472. [Google Scholar]
  24. B. Chen, J.Q. Chen and Y.C. Cao, Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng. 31, 618 (2012). DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6915.2012.03.021. [Google Scholar]
  25. H.Y. Zhang, Y. Wang, G.L. Ma et al., Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng. 37, 2200 (2018). DOI: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2018.0006. [Google Scholar]
  26. T. Xu, B. Bai and Y.M. Liu, Eng. Mech. 36, 123 (2019). DOI: CNKI:SUN:GCLX.0.2019-05-012. [Google Scholar]
  27. M.V. Villar, B. Carbonell, P.L. Martin and C. Gutierrez-Alvarez, Eng. Geol. 286, 106087 (2021). DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106087. [Google Scholar]
  28. T. Popp, C. Rolke and K. Salzer, Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 415, 19 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1144/SP415.1. [Google Scholar]
  29. R.J. Cuss, J.F. Harrington, D.J. Noy, C.C. Graham and P. Sellin, Appl. Clay Sci. 102, 81 (2014). DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.14334.28489. [Google Scholar]
  30. C. Graham, J. Harrington, R. Cuss and P. Sellin, Mineral. Mag. 76, 3279 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1180/minmag.2012.076.8.41. [Google Scholar]
  31. C.C. Graham, J.F. Harrington, R.J. Cuss and P. Sellin, Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 400, 303 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1144/SP400.32. [Google Scholar]
  32. C.C. Graham, J.F. Harrington and P. Sellin, Appl. Clay Sci. 132-133, 353 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.10.053. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.