EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 730 (2026) E3S Web Conf., 730 (2026) 01006 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 730, 2026
International Conference on Advances and Innovations in Soft Soil Engineering (Soft Soils 2026)
Article Number 01006
Number of page(s) 6
Section Field and Laboratory Testing
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202673001006
Published online 03 August 2026
  1. M.C. Ervin, N.D. Benson, J.R. Morgan, N. Pavlovic, Melbourne’s Southbank Interchange: a permanent excavation in compressible clay, Can. Geotech. J. 41(5), 861–876, (2004). https://doi.org/10.1139/t04-043. [Google Scholar]
  2. M.C. Ervin, Engineering properties of Quaternary age sediments of the Yarra Delta, in: Eng. Geol. Melb., Routledge, pp. 245–259, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  3. M.C. Ervin, J.R. Morgan, Groundwater control around a large basement, Can. Geotech. J. 38(4), 732–740, (2001). https://doi.org/10.1139/t01-011. [Google Scholar]
  4. M.C. Ervin, Engineering Properties of Coode Island Silt, 1996. Golder Associates Pty. Ltd. MCE/dl/96036. [Google Scholar]
  5. D. King, A. Bouazza, J. Gniel, H. Bui, New insight into the compressibility and structured nature of coode island silt, Aust. Geomech. 51(2), 45–62, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  6. T. Lunne, T. Berre, S. Strandvik, Sample disturbance effects in soft low plastic Norwegian clay, in: Symp. Recent Dev. Soil Pavement Mech. Coord. Do Aperf. Pessoal Niv. Super. CNPq-Conselho Nac. Desenvolv. Cient. a Tecnol. FAPERJ-Fundacao Ampora a Pesqui. Do Estado D, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  7. H. Tanaka, P. Sharma, T. Tsuchida, M. Tanaka, Comparative study on sample quality using several types of samplers, Soils Found. 36(2), 57–68, (1996). https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.36.2_57. [Google Scholar]
  8. B. Di Buò, J. Selänpää, T.T. Länsivaara, M. D’Ignazio, Evaluation of sample quality from different sampling methods in Finnish soft sensitive clays, Can. Geotech. J. 56(8), 1154–1168, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2018-0066. [Google Scholar]
  9. J.T. DeJong, C.P. Krage, B.M. Albin, D.J. DeGroot, Work-based framework for sample quality evaluation of low plasticity soils, J. Geotech. Geoenvironmental Eng. 144(10), 4018074, (2018). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001941. [Google Scholar]
  10. M.N. Nawaz, S.H. Chow, M. Miri Disfani, Sampling Disturbance Effects on Deformation and Strength Properties of Coode Island Silt, Can. Geotech. J. 00, 1–20, (2026). https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2025-0787. [Google Scholar]
  11. T. Shogaki, M. Kaneko, Effects of sample disturbance on strength and consolidation parameters of soft clay, Soils Found. 34(3), 1–10 (1994). https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.34.3_1. [Google Scholar]
  12. H.A. Amundsen, V. Thakur, Storage duration effects on soft clay samples, Geotech. Test. J. 42(4), 1031–1054, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20170426. [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Bozozuk, Effect of sampling, size, and storage on test results for marine clay, in: Sampl. Soil Rock, ASTM International, 1971. [Google Scholar]
  14. K. Ouyang, J. Pineda, Storage effects on tube specimens of a highly plastic marine clay, Can. Geotech. J. 63, 1–16, (2026). https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2024-0706. [Google Scholar]
  15. Humza Tariq and Mihiri Priyanwada Ratnaweera, Sample disturbance effects on the deformation properties of Coode Island Silt, 2022. EMI Capstone Final Report (ENGR90038). [Google Scholar]
  16. D.E. Becker, J.H.A. Crooks, K. Been, M.G. Jefferies, Work as a criterion for determining in situ and yield stresses in clays, Can. Geotech. J. 24(4), 549–564, (1987). https://doi.org/10.1139/t87-070. [Google Scholar]
  17. G. Rocchi, G. Vaciago, M. Fontana, M. Da Prat, Understanding sampling disturbance and behaviour of structured clays through constitutive modelling, Soils Found. 53(2), 315–334, (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2013.02.011. [Google Scholar]
  18. M.J. Hvorslev, Subsurface exploration and sampling of soils for civil engineering purposes, (1949). [Google Scholar]
  19. I. Mataic, D. Wang, L. Korkiala-Tanttu, Effect of destructuration on the compressibility of Perniö clay in incremental loading oedometer tests, Int. J. Geomech. 16(1), 4015016, (2016). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000486. [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Long, The 2nd Hanrahan Lecture: Geotechnical properties of Irish compressible soils, Q. J. Eng. Geol. Hydrogeol. 53, 475–522, (2020). https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2018-144. D.J. DeGroot, C.C. Ladd, Site characterization for cohesive soil deposits using combined in situ and laboratory testing, in: Geotech. Eng. State Art Pract. Keynote Lect. from GeoCongress, pp. 565–607, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  21. T. Lunne, J.J.M. Powell, P.K. Robertson, Cone penetration testing in geotechnical practice, CRC press, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781482295047. [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Long, G. Gudjonsson, S. Donohue, K. Hagberg, Engineering characterisation of Norwegian glaciomarine silt, Eng. Geol. 110(3-4), 51–65, (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.11.002. [Google Scholar]
  23. G.T. Lim, J. Pineda, N. Boukpeti, J.A.H. Carraro, A. Fourie, Effects of sampling disturbance in geotechnical design, Can. Geotech. J. 56(2), 275–289, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2018-0016. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.