EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 730 (2026) E3S Web Conf., 730 (2026) 01011 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 730, 2026
International Conference on Advances and Innovations in Soft Soil Engineering (Soft Soils 2026)
Article Number 01011
Number of page(s) 7
Section Field and Laboratory Testing
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202673001011
Published online 03 August 2026
  1. P. V. Lade, J. A. Yamamuro, Effects of nonplastic fines on static liquefaction of sands. Can. Geotech. J. 34, 918–928 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1139/t97-052 [Google Scholar]
  2. S. M. Olson, T. D. Stark, Yield strength ratio and liquefaction analysis of slopes and embankments. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 129(8), 727–737 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:8(727) [Google Scholar]
  3. M. G. Jefferies, K. Been, Soil Liquefaction: A Critical State Approach, 2nd ed. CRC Press, London (2016). [Google Scholar]
  4. K. Been, M. G. Jefferies, A state parameter for sands. Géotechnique 35, 99–112 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1985.35.2.99 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. R. W. Boulanger, I. M. Idriss, CPT-based liquefaction triggering procedure, J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142(2) (2016) 04015065. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001388 [Google Scholar]
  6. L. Monforte, M. Arroyo, A. Gens, A relation between undrained CPTu results and the state parameter for liquefiable soils. Can. Geotech. J. 60.11 (2023): 1756–1774. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2022-0377 [Google Scholar]
  7. D. Reid, A. Fourie, J. L. Ayala, S. Dickinson, F. Ochoa-Cornejo, R. Fanni, G. Suazo, Results of a critical state line testing round robin programme. Géotechnique 71, 616–630 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.19.P.373 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. R. Carroll, M. Long, Sample disturbance effects in silt, J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143(9) (2017) 0401706. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001749 [Google Scholar]
  9. J. A. Sladen, R. D’Hollander, E. L. Krahn, The liquefaction of sands: a collapse surface approach. Can. Geotech. J. 22, 564–578 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1139/t85-076 [Google Scholar]
  10. K. Been, M. G. Jefferies, J. Hachey, The critical state of sands. Géotechnique 41, 365–381 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1991.41.3.365 [Google Scholar]
  11. K. Been Characterizing mine tailings for geotechnical design. Austr. Geomech. 51(4), 59–78 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  12. Ø. Blaker, D. J. DeGroot, Intact, disturbed, and reconstituted undrained shear behavior of low-plasticity natural silt, J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 146(8) (2020) 04020062. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002299 [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Fourie, R. Verdugo, A. Bjelkevik, L. A. Torres-Cruz, D. Znidarcic, Geotechnics of mine tailings: a 2022 State of the art. Proc. 20th ICSMGE 20, 121–183 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  14. J. S. L’Heureux, T. Lunne, Characterization and engineering properties of natural soils used for geotesting. AIMS Geosci. 6, 35–53 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2020004 [Google Scholar]
  15. R. Carroll, P. Paniagua, Variable rate of penetration and dissipation test results in a natural silty soil, in: Cone Penetration Testing 2018, CRC Press, London (2018) 205–212. [Google Scholar]
  16. P. Carotenuto, C. Bilici, T. Lunne, A. H. Augustesen, L. Krogh, H. Dias, N. Adams, Study of partial drainage effects in a natural silty deposit using variable rate CPTu testing. Offshore Site Investig. Geotech. – Proc. 9th Int. Conf., Soc. Underw. Technol., London 2023 (2023), 305–312. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ø. Blaker, R. Carroll, A. P. Paniagua Lopez, D. J. DeGroot, J. S. L’Heureux, Halden research site: geotechnical characterization of a post glacial silt, AIMS Geosci. 5(2) (2019) 184–201. https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2019.2.184 [Google Scholar]
  18. J. Desrues, R. Chambon, M. Mokni, F. Mazerolle, Void ratio evolution inside shear bands in triaxial sand specimens studied by computed tomography. Géotechnique 46 (3), 529–546 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1996.46.3.529 [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Viana Da Fonseca, D. Cordeiro, and F. Molina-Gómez, Recommended Procedures to Assess Critical State Locus from Triaxial Tests in Cohesionless Remoulded Samples, Geotechnics 1, 95–127 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/geotechnics1010006 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. K. Boschi, E. Parra, L. Monforte, P. Paniagua, E.A. Oguz, M. Arroyo, GEOLAB – G-SCAN – Geotechnical Soil Characterization to Alleviate Natural Disasters. Zenodo (2025). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15024434 [Google Scholar]
  21. E. Parra. MSc thesis: Determination of the Critical State Line for a Silty Soil from Halden, Norway. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (2025) [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Arroyo, L. Monforte, S. Collico, How many triaxial tests do you actually need to get a critical state line? Proc. Tailings Mine Waste 2024, 2191–2202 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  23. L. Monforte, S. Collico, M. Arroyo, Bayesian identification of the critical state line of a liquefiable silt. Manuscript submitted for publication (2026). [Google Scholar]
  24. X.S. Li, Y. Wang. Linear Representation of Steady-State Line for Sand. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 124, 1215–1217 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  25. D. D. Porcino, V. Diano, T. Triantafyllidis, & T. Wichtmann. Predicting undrained static response of sand with non-plastic fines in terms of equivalent granular state parameter. Acta Geotech. 15(4), 867–882, (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. J. Ayala, A. Fourie, & D. Reid. Improved cone penetration test predictions of the state parameter of loose mine tailings. Can. Geotech. J. 59(11), 1969–1980, (2022). https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2021-0460 [Google Scholar]
  27. H.D. Plewes, M.P. Davies, & M. Jefferies, CPT based screening procedure for evaluating liquefaction susceptibility. Proc. 45th Can. Geotech. Conf., Toronto, Canada 45 (1992). [Google Scholar]
  28. Boulanger, R.W. DeJong, J.T. Inverse filtering procedure to correct cone penetration data for thin-layer and transition effects. Cone Penetration Testing 2018 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  29. Monforte, L., Collico, S. Inherent and CPTu-measured scale of fluctuation of undrained geomaterials: a numerical perspective. Proc. 7th Int. Conf. Geotech. Geophys. Site Charact. 2024 (2024). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.