EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 730 (2026) E3S Web Conf., 730 (2026) 01013 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 730, 2026
International Conference on Advances and Innovations in Soft Soil Engineering (Soft Soils 2026)
Article Number 01013
Number of page(s) 6
Section Field and Laboratory Testing
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202673001013
Published online 03 August 2026
  1. G. Kruse, E. Den Haan, Characterisation and engineering properties of dutch peats, in Second International Workshop on Characterisation and Engineering Properties of Natural Soils (2006), 2101–2133. [Google Scholar]
  2. E. Den Haan, A. Feddema, Deformation and strength of embankments on soft dutch soil. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Geotech. Eng. 166, 239–252 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1680/geng.9.00086 [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Muraro, C. Jommi, Experimental determination of the shear strength of peat from standard undrained triaxial tests: correcting for the effects of end restraint. Géotechnique 71, 76–87 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.18.P.346 [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Lemnitzer, R. Cappa, S. Yniesta, S. Brandenberg, Centrifuge testing of model levees atop peat: experimental data. Earthquake Spectra 32, 1903–1924 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1193/032715EQS048 [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Long, Centrifuge modelling of sand and sawdust embankments on peat for sustainable infrastructure development, in Proceedings of the XVIII ECSMGE 2024 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  6. C. Zwanenburg, G. Erkens, Uitdam, the Netherlands: test site for soft fibrous peat. AIMS Geosci. 5, 804–830 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2019.4.804 [Google Scholar]
  7. C. Chen, Z. Zhou, X. Zhang, G. Xu, Behavior of amorphous peaty soil under long-term cyclic loading. Int. J. Geomech. 18, 04018115 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001254 [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Tong, T. Wu, L. Guo, Z. Yuan, H. Jin, Long-term cyclic behavior of soft clay under different variable confining pressures and partially drained conditions. Transp. Geotech. 33, 100723 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2022.100723 [Google Scholar]
  9. C. Chen, G. Xu, Z. Zhou, L. Kong, X. Zhang, S. Yin, Undrained dynamic behaviour of peaty organic soil under long-term cyclic loading, part II: constitutive model and simulation. Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 129, 105902 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.01.039 [Google Scholar]
  10. C. Zwanenburg, R. J. Jardine, Laboratory, in situ and full-scale load tests to assess flood embankment stability on peat. Géotechnique 65, 309–326 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.14.P.257 [Google Scholar]
  11. R. J. Jardine, Geotechnics, energy and climate change: the 56th rankine lecture. Géotechnique 70, 3–59 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.18.RL.001 [Google Scholar]
  12. H. T. L. Massop, Monitoring long-term peat subsidence with subsidence platens in zegveld, the Netherlands. Geoderma 450, 1–16 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.117039 [Google Scholar]
  13. C. Zwanenburg, M. Konstadinou, E. Grünewald, Geotechnical characterization and strain-rate dependent response of peat from the Netherlands. AIMS Geosci. 11, 923–945 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2025040 [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Zhang, T. De Gast, C. Zwanenburg, K. Gavin, Full-scale load tests to assess the bearing capacity of peat at zegveld. AIMS Geosci. 11, 828–845 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2025035 [Google Scholar]
  15. B. Z. Coelho, J. Priest, P. Hölscher, Dynamic behaviour of transition zones in soft soils during regular train traffic. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. F: J. Rail Rapid Transit 232, 645–662 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409716683078 [Google Scholar]
  16. J. Liu, J. Xiao, Experimental study on the stability of railroad silt subgrade with increasing train speed. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 136, 833–841 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000282 [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Singh, B. Indraratna, T. T. Nguyen, Experimental insights into the stiffness degradation of subgrade soils prone to mud pumping. Transp. Geotech. 27, 100490 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100490 [Google Scholar]
  18. Deltares, Analysis of actual axle loads, related to embankment stability, 11207168-010-GEO-0001 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  19. Deltares, Three-dimensional dynamic finite element analysis of embankments, 11207168-011-GEO-0001 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  20. Y. Cai, L. Xu, W. Liu, Y. Shang, N. Su, D. Feng, Field test study on the dynamic response of the cement-improved expansive soil subgrade of a heavy-haul railway. Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 128, 105878 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105878 [Google Scholar]
  21. B. Indraratna, T. Ngo, F. B. Ferreira, C. Rujikiatkamjorn, A. Tucho, Large-scale testing facility for heavy haul track. Transp. Geotech. 28, 100517 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100517 [Google Scholar]
  22. T. Lunne, P. K. Robertson, J. J. M. Powell, Cone penetration testing in geotechnical practice (CRC Press, London, 1997) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.