EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 730 (2026) E3S Web Conf., 730 (2026) 02008 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 730, 2026
International Conference on Advances and Innovations in Soft Soil Engineering (Soft Soils 2026)
Article Number 02008
Number of page(s) 8
Section Multiphysics Behaviour
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202673002008
Published online 03 August 2026
  1. Ouvrard A-E, Bourillet C (2026) Arrêté du 9 janvier 2026 modifiant l’arrêté du 22 juillet 2020 définissant les zones exposées au phénomène de mouvement de terrain différentiel consécutif à la sécheresse et à la réhydratation des sols argileux - Légifrance. [Google Scholar]
  2. Moncoulon D, Desarthe J, Naulin JP, et al (2023) Conséquences du changement climatique sur le coût des catastrophes naturelles en France à l’horizon 2050. Caisse Centrale de Réassurance & Météo France, Paris https://www.ccr.fr/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Etude-Climatique-2018-version-complete.pdf [Google Scholar]
  3. France Assureurs (2021) Impact du changement climatique sur l’assurance à l’horizon 2050. https://www.franceassureurs.fr/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/vf_france-assureurs_impact-du-changement-climatique-2050.pdf [Google Scholar]
  4. Fredlund DG (2012) Unsaturated Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2006)132:3(286) [Google Scholar]
  5. Fredlund DG, Rahardjo H (1993) An overview of unsaturated soil behaviour. Geot. special pub. 1–1 [Google Scholar]
  6. Zapata CE (1999) Uncertainty in soil-water-characteristic curve and impacts on unsaturated shear strength predictions. Arizona State University [Google Scholar]
  7. Bulut R, Javid AH (2019) Developing Implementable Climatic Input Data and Moisture Boundary Conditions for Pavement Analysis and Design [Google Scholar]
  8. Javid AH, Bulut R (2022) A Mechanistic-Empirical Model to Predict Suction Profile in Subgrade Soil. Tran-SET 2020,87–99 https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784483305.009 [Google Scholar]
  9. Briaud J-L, Zhang X, Moon S (2003) Shrink Test-Water Content Method for Shrink and Swell Predictions. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 129, 590–600. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:7(590) [Google Scholar]
  10. Overton DD, Chao K-C, Nelson JD (2006) Time rate of heave prediction for expansive soils. In: GeoCongress 2006, 1–6 https://doi.org/10.1061/40803(187)162 [Google Scholar]
  11. Richards LA (1931) Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums. Physics 1,318–333 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1745010 [Google Scholar]
  12. Mitchell PW (1980) The structural analysis of footings on expansive soil. In: Expansive soils. ASCE, p. 438 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cai S, Saha S, Birgisson B, Lytton R (2025) Development of a mechanistic-empirical framework to predict moisture variation for clayey subgrade soil. Int. J. Pavement Eng. 26 https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2025.2485309 [Google Scholar]
  14. Javid AH, Bulut R (2023) Equilibrium Suction Prediction Model for Subgrade Soils in Oklahoma. Int. J. Geomech. 23. https://doi.org/10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-7076 [Google Scholar]
  15. Saha S, Hariharan N, Gu F, et al (2019) Development of a mechanistic-empirical model to predict equilibrium suction for subgrade soil. J. Hydrol. 575, 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.035 [Google Scholar]
  16. Yue Chen, Yue Chen, Yue Chen, et al (2022) Analysis of the Depth of the Active Zone via Coupled Hydro-Mechanical Analysis. Geo-Congress 2022. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784484050.035 [Google Scholar]
  17. Adem HH, Vanapalli SK (2014) Elasticity moduli of expansive soils from dimensional analysis. Geotech. Res. 1:60–72. https://doi.org/10.1680/gr.14.00006 [Google Scholar]
  18. Cherry JA, Freeze RA (1979) Groundwater. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall [Google Scholar]
  19. Gitirana G, Fredlund M (2005) Infiltration-runoff boundary conditions in seepage analysis. Prof the 58th Can. Geotech. Conf., Saskatoon, Canada, 18-21 September [Google Scholar]
  20. Horton (1933) The Rôle of infiltration in the hydrologic cycle. Eos Trans AGU 14:446–460. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR014i001p00446 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kostiakov AN (1932) On the dynamics of the coefficient of water percolation in soils and the necessity of studying it from the dynamic point of view for the purposes of amelioration, Transactions of 6th Com. Int. Soc.y of Soil Sci. [Google Scholar]
  22. Vu HQ, Fredlund DG (2004) The prediction of one-, two-, and three-dimensional heave in expansive soils, Can. Geotech. J 41,713–737. https://doi.org/10.1139/t04-023 [Google Scholar]
  23. Abed A (2008) Numerical Modeling of Expansive Soil Behavior [Google Scholar]
  24. Teodosio B, Baduge KSK, Mendis P (2020) Simulating reactive soil and substructure interaction using a simplified hydro-mechanical finite element model dependent on soil saturation, suction and moisture-swelling relationship. Comp. and Geotech. 119, 103359 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103359 [Google Scholar]
  25. Assadollahi H, Nowamooz H (2020) Long-term analysis of the shrinkage and swelling of clayey soils in a climate change context by numerical modelling and field monitoring. Comp. and Geotech. 127, 103763 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103763 [Google Scholar]
  26. Zhang J, Little DN, Hariharan N, Kim Y-R (2019) Prediction of climate specific vertical movement of pavements with expansive soils based on long-term 2D numerical simulation of rainwater infiltration. Comp. and Geotech. 115, 103172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103172 [Google Scholar]
  27. Habets F (1998) Modélisation du cycle continental de l’eaua l’échelle régionale: application aux bassins versants de l’Adour et du Rhône. PhD Thesis, PhD thesis, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France [Google Scholar]
  28. Le Moigne P, Besson F, Martin E, et al (2020) The latest improvements with SURFEX v8.0 of the Safran– Isba–Modcou hydrometeorological model for France. Geos. Mod. Dev. 13, 3925–3946. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3925-2020 [Google Scholar]
  29. Fredlund DG, Xing A (1994) Equations for the soil-water characteristic curve. Can Geotech J 31, 521–532. https://doi.org/10.1139/t94-061 [Google Scholar]
  30. Childs EC, Collis-George N (1950) The control of soil water. Adv. in agr. 2:233–272 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60766-X [Google Scholar]
  31. Ebrahimi-Birang N, Gitirana Jr GFN, Fredlund DG, et al (2004) A lower limit for the water permeability coefficient. In: Proc. of the 57th Can. Geotech.Conf., Quebec City, 24–27 [Google Scholar]
  32. Noilhan J, Planton S (1989) A simple parameterization of land surface processes for meteorological models. Monthly weather review 117, 536–549 https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117<0536:aspols>2.0.co;2 [Google Scholar]
  33. Noilhan J, Mahfouf J-F (1996) The ISBA land surface parameterisation scheme. Glob. and plan. Chang. 13, 145–159 https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8181(95)00043-7 [Google Scholar]
  34. Faroux S, Kaptué Tchuenté AT, Roujean J-L, et al (2013) ECOCLIMAP-II/Europe: A twofold database of ecosystems and surface parameters at 1 km resolution based on satellite information for use in land surface, meteorological and climate models. Geos. Mod. Dev. 6, 563–582 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-563-2013 [Google Scholar]
  35. Nachtergaele F, Van Velthuizen H, Verelst L, et al (2010) Harmonized world soil database. In: Proc.of the 19th w. cong. of soil sci., Brisbane, Australia. International Union of Soil Sciences, pp 34–37 [Google Scholar]
  36. Ledoux E, Girard G, Marsily G, et al (1989) Spatially Distributed Modeling: Conceptual Approach, Coupling Surface Water And Groundwater. Unsat. Flow in Hyd. Mod., 435–454 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2352-2_16 [Google Scholar]
  37. Gourdier S (2018) Suivi du site instrumenté « argiles » de Chaingy (Loiret) – Phase 4 : suivi annuel 2017. Programme de travail BRGM-DGPR 2017.Action C.8. BRGM / RP-67802-FR. 44 p. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.