EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 730 (2026) E3S Web Conf., 730 (2026) 02011 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 730, 2026
International Conference on Advances and Innovations in Soft Soil Engineering (Soft Soils 2026)
Article Number 02011
Number of page(s) 6
Section Multiphysics Behaviour
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202673002011
Published online 03 August 2026
  1. P. K. Robertson & K. L Cabal, Guide to Cone Penetration Testing for Geotechnical Engineering. (Gregg Drilling & Testing, Signal Hill, CA, 2015). [Google Scholar]
  2. C. I. Teh, G. T. Houlsby, An analytical study of the cone penetration test in clay. Géotechnique 41, 17–34 (1991). [Google Scholar]
  3. T. Lunne, P. K. Robertson, J. M. Powell, Cone Penetration Testing in Geotechnical Practice. (Blackie Academic & Professional, London, UK, 1997). [Google Scholar]
  4. P. W. Mayne, J. Peuchen, Evaluation of CPTU Nkt cone factor for undrained strength of clays. in Cone Penetration Testing 423–429 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  5. H.E. Low, T. Lunne, K.H. Andersen, M.A. Sjursen, X. Li, M.F. Randolph, Estimation of intact and remoulded undrained shear strengths from penetration tests in soft clays. Géotechnique 60, 843–859 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  6. S. J. Wheeler, The undrained shear strength of soils containing large gas bubbles. Géotechnique 38, 399–413 (1988). [Google Scholar]
  7. Y. Hong., L. Wang, C. Ng, B. Yang, Effect of initial pore pressure on undrained shear behaviour of fine-grained gassy soil. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 54, 1592–1600 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  8. C. Jommi, S. Muraro, E. Trivellato, C. Zwanenburg, Experimental results on the influence of gas on the mechanical response of peats. Géotechnique 69, 753–766 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  9. H. F. Zhao, S. Muraro, C. Jommi, Gas exsolution and gas invasion in peat: towards a comprehensive modelling framework. Géotechnique Letters 10, 461–467 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  10. D. Tarragó, A. Gens, Gas Effect On CPTu and Dissipation Test Carried Out On Natural Soft Soil of Barcelona Port. in Cone Penetration Testing 2018 605– 609 (CRC Press, 2018). [Google Scholar]
  11. L. Mele, P. Bonassisa, S. Lirer, A. Flora Induced Partial Saturation as mitigation technique against liquefaction: an energetic approach for design tools. Japanese Geotechnical Society Special Publication 10, 1677–1683 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  12. H. Wang et al. Study on the CPTu inversion methods for strength and consolidation parameters of gassy soil with different gas contents. Applied Ocean Research 146, 103960 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Halleux, K. Boschi, L. Flessati, C. Jommi, G-PFEM-aided derivation of undrained shear strength of organic clays from CPT data. in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization 1896–1902 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  14. C. Jommi, S. Muraro, C. Chao, Interpreting repeated CPT in unsaturated soils. in 7th International Conference on Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization (CIMNE, 2024). [Google Scholar]
  15. M. A. Mánica, M. Arroyo, A. Gens, L. Monforte, Application of a critical state model to the Merriespruit tailings dam failure. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Geotechnical Engineering (2022). [Google Scholar]
  16. K. Boschi, M. Arroyo, L. Monforte, J. M. Carbonell, A. Gens, Coupled hydromechanical modelling of cone penetration in layered liquefiable soils. Geotechnique 75, 308–322 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  17. H. S. Yu, CASM: A unified state parameter model for clay and sand. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 22, 621–653 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  18. E. Ponzoni, Historical constructions on natural silty soils accounting for the interaction with the atmosphere. (Università degli Studi di Brescia, 2017). [Google Scholar]
  19. S. Muraro, The deviatoric behaviour of peat: a route between past empiricism and future perspectives. (Delft University of Technology, 2019). [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Pietruszczak, G. N. Pande, On the mechanics of partially saturated soils. Comput. Geotech. 12, 55–71 (1991). [Google Scholar]
  21. K. A. Schmidt, G. K. Folas, B. Kvamme, Calculation of the interfacial tension of the methane–water system with the linear gradient theory. Fluid Phase Equilibria 261, 230–237 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  22. L. Monforte, M. Arroyo, J. M. Carbonell, A. Gens, Numerical simulation of undrained insertion problems in geotechnical engineering with the particle finite element method (PFEM). Comput. Geotech. 82, 44–156 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  23. L. Monforte, M. Arroyo, J. M. Carbonell, A. Gens, Coupled effective stress analysis of insertion problems in geotechnics with the particle finite element method. Comput. Geotech. 101, 114–129 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  24. P. Dadvand, R. Rossi, E. Oñate, An object-oriented environment for developing finite element codes for multidisciplinary applications. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 17, 253–297 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  25. L. Monforte, M.O. Ciantia, J. M. Carbonell, M. Arroyo, A. Gens, A stable mesh-independent approach for numerical modelling of structured soils at large strains. Comput. Geotech. 116, 103215 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.