Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 730, 2026
International Conference on Advances and Innovations in Soft Soil Engineering (Soft Soils 2026)
Article Number 03008
Number of page(s) 6
Section Constitutive, Numerical, and Machine Learning Models
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202673003008
Published online 03 August 2026
  1. P.K. Sikdar, Geology of the Quaternary Aquifers of the twin city of Calcutta-Howrah. J. Geol. Soc. India 56 (Aug.), 169–181 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  2. S.K. Acharyya, B.A. Shah, 2007. Arsenic contaminated groundwater from parts of Damodar fan-delta and west of Bhagirathi River, West Bengal, India: influence of fluvial geomorphology and Quaternary morphostratigraphy. Environ. Geol. 52 (3), 489–501 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-006-0482-z. [Google Scholar]
  3. D.R. Nandy, Need for seismic microzonation of Kolkata megacity. In: Proceedings of workshop on microzonation, Indian Institute of science, Bangalore, India, June 26–27, pp. 140–142 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  4. S. Mandal, K. Das, D. Mistry, K. Bandyopadhyay, and G. R. Dodagoudar, Effective stress-based nonlinear ground response analysis of Holocene deposits of Kolkata, India. Eng. Geol. 354, 108197 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  5. K. Das, S. Bandyopadhyay, & K. Bandyopadhyay, Use of in-situ tests like flat plate dilatometer (DMT) and Seismic Dilatometer (SDMT) vis-à-vis finite element-based software to examine the efficacy of ground improvement work at a high rise residential project in Kolkata. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 18(1), 49–65. (2024) https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2024.2377457 [Google Scholar]
  6. K. Das, S. Nandi, S. Chattaraj, A. Halder, & W. Sadhukhan, Estimation of subsoil parameters and settlement of foundation for a project in Kolkata based on CPT, DMT. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2286(1), 012026. (2022) [Google Scholar]
  7. K. Bandyopadhyay, K. Das, S. Nandi, et al. Dilatometer—an in-Situ Soil Exploration Tool for Problematic Ground Conditions vis-à-vis for Economizing Construction Activities. Indian Geotech J 52, 1155–1170 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-022-00655-7 [Google Scholar]
  8. ASTM D6635-15.: Standard Test Method for Performing the Flat Plate Dilatometer. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA (2015). [Google Scholar]
  9. ISO 22476-11:2017(E).: Geotechnical Investigation and Testing – Field Testing – Part 11: Flat Dilatometer Test. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland (2017). [Google Scholar]
  10. Eurocode 7.: Geotechnical Design – Part 2: Ground Investigation and Testing. CEN European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium (2007). [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Marchetti, P. Monaco, G. Totani, M. Calabrese, The Flat Dilatometer Test (DMT) in Soil Investigations – A Report by the ISSMGE Committee TC16. Proceedings, Int. Conf. on Insitu Measurement of Soil Properties and Case Histories, 95–131. Parahyangan Catholic University, Bandung, Indonesia. Official version approved by TC16 reprinted in Proceedings, DMT’06 (Eds: Failmezger, R.A. & Anderson, J.B.), 7–48. In-Situ Soil Testing, Lancaster, VA, USA (2001). [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Marchetti, Some 2015 Updates to the TC16 DMT Report 2001. Proceedings DMT’15 (Eds: Marchetti, S., Monaco, P. & Viana da Fonseca, A.), 43–65, Rome, Italy (2005). [Google Scholar]
  13. D. Marchetti, P. Monaco, S. Amoroso, and L. Minarelli, In situ tests by Medusa DMT. In: Proc. 17th European Conf. on Soil Mech. and Geotech. Eng. ECSMGE-2019, Reykjavik, Iceland, 1-6 September. (2019) [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Di. Mariano, M. Arroyo, A. Gens, P. Monaco, & S. Amoroso, SDMT-Based Numerical Analyses of Deep Excavation in Soft Soil. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 145(11), 04019087. ASCE Library. (2019) [Google Scholar]
  15. P. Monaco, and S. Marchetti, “Evaluation of the coefficient of subgrade reaction for design of multipropped diaphragm walls from DMT moduli.” In Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Site Characterization, 993– 1002. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Millpress. (2004) [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Arroyo, A. Di Mariano, P. Monaco, M. Devincenzi, and N. Pérez., “SDMT-based deep excavation design.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Site Characterization, 967– 973. London: Taylor & Francis. (2008) [Google Scholar]
  17. Plaxis (2023). “Plaxis Material Models Manual”. Plaxis 2D/3D 2023.1, Published by Bentley Advancing Infrastructure [Google Scholar]
  18. N. Janbu, Soil compressibility as determined by oedometer and triaxial tests. Proc. ECSMFE Wiesbaden, 1, 19–25. (1963) [Google Scholar]
  19. P. von Soos, Properties of soil and rock (in german). In In: Grundbautaschenbuch Part 4. Ernst & Sohn, Berlin. (1990) [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Marchetti, & G. Totani, “Ch Evaluations from DMTA Dissipation Curves”. Proc. XII ICSMFE, Rio de Janeiro, Vol. 1, 281–286. (1989) [Google Scholar]
  21. J.P. Carter, M.F. Randolph, & C.P. Wroth, “Stress and pore pressure changes in clay during and after the expansion of a cylindrical cavity”. Int. Jnl Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech., 3, 305–322. (1979) [Google Scholar]
  22. Zhongkun Ouyang and Paul W. Mayne, Effective friction angle of clays and silts from piezocone penetration tests. Can. Geotech. J., 55(9): 1230–1247. (2018) https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2017-0451 [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Ltifi, T. Abichou, & J.P. Tisot, Effects of Soil Aging on Mechanical and Hydraulic Properties of a Silty Soil. Geotech Geol Eng 32, 1101–1108 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-014-9784-1 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.