Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 730, 2026
International Conference on Advances and Innovations in Soft Soil Engineering (Soft Soils 2026)
Article Number 04004
Number of page(s) 6
Section Ground Improvement and Low-Carbon Solutions
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202673004004
Published online 03 August 2026
  1. A. Md Zahri, and A. Zainorabidin, An overview of traditional and non traditional stabilizer for soft soil. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 527, 012015 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  2. X. Wang, S. Kim, Y. Wu, Y. Liu, T. Liu, and Y. Wang, Study on the optimization and performance of GFC soil stabilizer based on response surface methodology in soft soil stabilization. Soil Found. 63, 101278 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  3. E. Oh, A. Balasubramaniam, M. Bolton, G. Chai, M. Braund, V. Wijeyakulasuriya, R. Nithiraj, and D. Bergado, Soft Clay Properties and Their Influence in Preloading with PVD and Sur-charge. 15SEAGC. In Proceedings of 15th Southeast Asian Geotechnical Engineering Conference, Bangkok, Thailand (2004) [Google Scholar]
  4. Y.-M. Chen, X.-W. Tang, and N. Jia, Consolidation of sensitive clay with vertical drain. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech. 31, 1695 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  5. B. Indraratna, A. S. Balasubramaniam, and P. Ratnayake, Performance of Embankment Stabilized with Vertical Drains on Soft Clay. J. Geotech. Engrg. 120, 257 (1994) [Google Scholar]
  6. P. M. Deshpande, Interactive Encased Stone-Column Foundation - Synopsis. DFI, 96, 1 (1996) [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Hov, P. Paniagua, C. Sætre, M. Long, G. Cornelissen, and S. Ritter, Stabilisation of Soft Clay, Quick Clay and Peat by Industrial By-Products and Biochars. Appl. Sci. 13, 9048 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Hov, P. Paniagua, C. Sætre, H. Rueslåtten, I. Størdal, M. Mengede, and C. Mevik, “Lime-cement stabilisation of Trondheim clays and its impact on carbon dioxide emissions. Soil Found. 62, 101162 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  9. P. Paniagua, B. K. Bache, K. Karlsrud, and A. K. Lund, Strength and stiffness of laboratory-mixed specimens of stabilised Norwegian clays. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng.- Ground Improv. 175, 150 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  10. P. Paniagua, S. Ritter, M. Moseid, and G. Okkenhaug, Bioashes and Steel Slag as Alternative Binders in Ground Improvement of Quick Clays. Geo-Congress 2023, Los Angeles, CA, USA, March 26–29 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  11. E. Ho Chu, H. Lim Ching, and G. Tan Chin, Jet Grouting Applications for Large-Scale Basement Construction in Soft Clay. Innovations in Grouting and Soil Improvement, Austin, TX, USA, January 24-26 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  12. T. Y. Poh, and I. H. Wong, A field trial of jet-grouting in marine clay. Can. Geotech. J. 38, 338 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  13. V. Q. Nguyen, T. N. Phan, and S. Likitlersuang, Influence of in-situ Soil Properties on the Mechanical Properties of Cement Treated Soft Clay: A Case Study in Vietnam. Transp. Infrastruct. Geotechnol. 13, 29 (2026) [Google Scholar]
  14. T. D. Nguyen, T. N. Phan, and S. Likitlersuang, Evaluating the Applicability of Large-Diameter Cement Deep Mixing Method for Soft Ground Improvement: A Landmark Case Study in Vietnam. Int. J. Geosy. Ground Eng. 11, 19 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  15. T. D. Nguyen, T. N. Phan, and S. Likitlersuang, Strength and Stiffness Characteristics of Clays Stabilised with Cement and Granulated Blast Furnace Slag in the Red River Delta, Vietnam. Int. J. Geosy. Ground Eng. 11, 58 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  16. G. Mertens, R. Snellings, K. Van Balen, B. Bicer-Simsir, P. Verlooy, and J. Elsen, Pozzolanic reactions of common natural zeolites with lime and parameters affecting their reactivity. Cem. Concr. Res. 39, 233 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  17. J.-S. L’Heureux, L. Anders, and E. Arnfinn, The Tiller-Flotten research site: Geotechnical characterization of a very sensitive clay deposit. AIMS Geosci. 5, 831 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  18. S. Ritter, P. Paniagua, and G. Cornelissen, Biochar in Quick Clay Stabilization: Reducing Carbon Footprint and Improving Shear Strength. Geo-Congress 2023, Los Angeles, CA, USA, March 26–29 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  19. T. Matschei, B. Lothenbach, and F. P. Glasser, The AFm phase in Portland cement. Cem. Concr. Res. 37, 118 (2007) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.